Views of diagnosis distribution in primary care in 2.5 million encounters in Stockholm: a comparison between ICD-10 and SNOMED CT.
暂无分享,去创建一个
Mikael Nyström | Lars-Erik Strender | Anna Vikström | Hans Ahlfeldt | G. Nilsson | H. Åhlfeldt | L. Strender | A. Vikström | Gunnar H Nilsson | M. Nyström
[1] R. Gunnarsson,et al. Patients, general practitioners, diseases and health problems in urban general practice: a cross-sectional study on electronic patient records , 2008, Primary Health Care Research & Development.
[2] T. Hansen,et al. Reliability of clinical ICD-10 schizophrenia diagnoses , 2005, Nordic journal of psychiatry.
[3] A. Rossi Mori,et al. Standards to Support Development of Terminological Systems for Healthcare Telematics , 1998, Methods of Information in Medicine.
[4] György Surján,et al. Design principles of DOLCE-based formal representation of ICD10 , 2008, MIE.
[5] A. Grimsmo,et al. Patients, diagnoses and processes in general practice in the Nordic countries. An attempt to make data from computerised medical records available for comparable statistics. , 2001, Scandinavian journal of primary health care.
[6] John F. Hurdle,et al. Measuring diagnoses: ICD code accuracy. , 2005, Health services research.
[7] V. Sundararajan,et al. Quality of Diagnosis and Procedure Coding in ICD-10 Administrative Data , 2006, Medical care.
[8] Gunnar H. Nilsson,et al. Enriching a primary health care version of ICD-10 using SNOMED CT mapping , 2010, J. Biomed. Semant..
[9] J. Sigurdsson,et al. Health problems in family practice. An Icelandic multicentre study. , 1996, Scandinavian journal of primary health care.
[10] R A Carleton,et al. Possible influence of the prospective payment system on the assignment of discharge diagnoses for coronary heart disease. , 1993, The New England journal of medicine.
[11] G. Hoddevik. [Diagnosis versus code]. , 2005, Tidsskrift for den Norske laegeforening : tidsskrift for praktisk medicin, ny raekke.
[12] J. Cimino. Desiderata for Controlled Medical Vocabularies in the Twenty-First Century , 1998, Methods of Information in Medicine.
[13] György Surján,et al. Questions on validity of International Classification of Diseases-coded diagnoses , 1999, Int. J. Medical Informatics.
[14] C. Weel,et al. The use of routinely collected computer data for research in primary care: opportunities and challenges. , 2006, Family practice.
[15] Margaret M Foley,et al. The code ahead: Key issues shaping clinical terminology and classification. , 2006, Journal of AHIMA.
[16] G. Nilsson,et al. Textual content, health problems and diagnostic codes in electronic patient records in general practice , 2003, Scandinavian journal of primary health care.
[17] Gunnar H. Nilsson,et al. Mapping the categories of the Swedish primary health care version of ICD-10 to SNOMED CT concepts: Rule development and intercoder reliability in a mapping trial , 2007, BMC Medical Informatics Decis. Mak..
[18] Jürgen Stausberg,et al. Reliability of diagnoses coding with ICD-10 , 2008, Int. J. Medical Informatics.
[19] Sue E Bowman. Coordinating SNOMED-CT and ICD-10: Getting the Most out of Electronic Health Record Systems , 2005 .
[20] M. Gersenovic. The ICD Family of Classifications , 1995, Methods of Information in Medicine.
[21] C. van Weel,et al. What went and what came? Morbidity trends in general practice from the Netherlands , 2008, The European journal of general practice.