Force delivery properties of thermoplastic orthodontic materials.

INTRODUCTION Our objectives were to evaluate the force and energy (resilience) delivery properties of thermoplastic overlay orthodontic materials and to determine the changes in force delivery properties after thermocycling or repeated load cycling. METHODS Three types and 3 thicknesses of materials were investigated. Three-point bending-recovery tests were performed at baseline and after cycling procedures. For cycling, the specimens were thermocycled for 1000 cycles or repeatedly deflected by 1 mm for 100 cycles. Vickers hardness was measured to determine the changes after thermocycling or repeated load cycling. RESULTS The amount of deflection for optimal force delivery was 0.2 to 0.5 mm. Thin material exerted high energy in the deflection range of optimal force delivery. In the deflection ranges of optimal force delivery (0.2-0.5 mm), the force delivery properties after thermocycling were not different from those at the baseline (P >.01) but were different after repeated load cycling (P <.01). Thermocycling and repeated load cycling influenced Vickers hardness significantly. CONCLUSIONS Thin material (0.508 mm) can deliver higher energy than thick materials (0.762 or 1.016 mm, P <.01) of the same brand. Therefore, thin material should be selected in the same brand of material. The effect of repeated deflection during service should be considered.

[1]  J. Sheridan Essix appliances : minor tooth movement with divots and windows , 1994 .

[2]  P. Begg Differential force in orthodontic treatment , 1956 .

[3]  D. Zwanziger,et al.  A clinical evaluation of the differential force concept as applied to the edgewise bracket. , 1980, American journal of orthodontics.

[4]  David A Chenin,et al.  Orthodontic treatment with a series of removable appliances. , 2003, Journal of the American Dental Association.

[5]  A. Caputo,et al.  Effects of aging on the dimensional stability of custom-made mouthguards. , 2002, Quintessence international.

[6]  S. Lindauer,et al.  Comparison of Essix and Hawley retainers. , 1998, Journal of clinical orthodontics : JCO.

[7]  B. Darvell,et al.  Thermal cycling procedures for laboratory testing of dental restorations. , 1999, Journal of dentistry.

[8]  C. Burstone,et al.  The Biology of Tooth Movement , 1988 .

[9]  R. Langer,et al.  Biodegradable, Elastic Shape-Memory Polymers for Potential Biomedical Applications , 2002, Science.

[10]  B W Lee,et al.  Relationship between Tooth-Movement Rate and Estimated Pressure Applied , 1965, Journal of dental research.

[11]  P. Begg,et al.  The differential force method of orthodontic treatment. , 1977, American journal of orthodontics.

[12]  Instrumented indentation characterisation of mouth-guard materials. , 2002, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[13]  J J Sheridan,et al.  Essix retainers: fabrication and supervision for permanent retention. , 1993, Journal of clinical orthodontics : JCO.

[14]  B W Lee,et al.  The force requirements for tooth movement, Part I: Tipping and bodily movement. , 1995, Australian orthodontic journal.

[15]  D. Rinchuse Active tooth movement with Essix-based appliances. , 1997, Journal of clinical orthodontics : JCO.

[16]  R. G. Craig Restorative dental materials , 1971 .

[17]  R. Boyd,et al.  Orthodontic treatment of a mildly crowded malocclusion using the Invisalign System™ , 2001, Australian orthodontic journal.

[18]  William L. Brudon,et al.  Orthodontic and Orthopedic Treatment in the Mixed Dentition , 1993 .

[19]  R. Storey,et al.  Force in orthodontics and its relation to tooth movement , 1952 .

[20]  T. Eliades,et al.  Structural conformation and leaching from in vitro aged and retrieved Invisalign appliances. , 2004, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[21]  M. Kayalioğlu,et al.  Tooth-size ratio for patients requiring 4 first premolar extractions. , 2005, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[22]  S. Kapila,et al.  Mechanical properties and clinical applications of orthodontic wires. , 1989, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[23]  H. D Kesling,et al.  The philosophy of the tooth positioning appliance , 1945 .