A Student-Staff Community of Practice Within an Inter-University Final-Year Project

In Australia, final year Bachelor of Engineering students complete an engineering research project. A small number of students (often between four and ten at any one university) elect topics in the field of engineering education. Relative to research in technical engineering, the insulated status of engineering education research can leave these students feeling isolated from other final year engineering students and faculty members. In 2013, we saw an opportunity to engage final year students and academics from two universities in a project to enhance industry engagement in engineering education. We established a research group of nine students and supervisors across the two universities. Each week the group met on campus and joined peers at the other university via a free Internet telephony service. Drawing on the reflections of community members, this chapter reports on the learning community that emerged within this project and the features that supported it. Critical to the community’s success were the regular meetings, the shared knowledge domain of engineering education, the commitment, diversity and quality of team-members, and engagement with the wider faculty and engineering education communities. Students and supervisors learned from and with each other and generated knowledge about the topic, collaboration, disciplines, research and themselves.

[1]  S. Hacker.  The culture of engineering: Woman, workplace and machine , 1981 .

[2]  Maura Borrego,et al.  Learning in Graduate Engineering Research Groups of Various Sizes , 2012 .

[3]  E. Wenger.  Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity , 1998 .

[4]  James Trevelyan.  Are we accidentally misleading students about engineering practice , 2011 .

[5]  B. Bass.  Transformational Leadership: Industrial, Military, and Educational Impact , 1997 .

[6]  Eric L. Lesser,et al.  Communities of practice and organizational performance , 2001, IBM Syst. J..

[7]  Learning development and study support an embedded approach through communities of practice , 2007 .

[8]  Sandra C. Jones,et al.  Distributed leadership: a collaborative framework for academics, executives and professionals in higher education , 2012 .

[9]  E. Wenger.  Communities of Practice and Social Learning Systems: the Career of a Concept , 2010 .

[10]  Etienne Wenger,et al.  Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity , 1998 .

[11]  F. Trede,et al.  Developing a Critical Professional Identity , 2012 .

[12]  K. Pithouse-Morgan,et al.  Learning from the First Year of the Transformative Education/al Studies (TES) Project , 2012 .

[13]  Charles C. Ragin,et al.  Constructing social research :the unity and diversity of method , 1996 .

[14]  Etienne Wenger,et al.  Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation , 1991 .

[15]  Samuel C. Florman,et al.  Non-technical Studies for Engineers: the Challenge of Relevance , 1997 .

[16]  Raymond D. Hingst,et al.  Community learning: member's stories about their academic community of practice , 2008 .

[17]  J. Creswell.  Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches, 2nd ed. , 2007 .

[18]  Mark Bush,et al.  Think engineer, think male? , 2009 .

[19]  William Snyder,et al.  Cultivating Communities of Practice: A Guide to Managing Knowledge , 2002 .

[20]  Janett Elizabeth Godfrey,et al.  The culture of engineering education and its interaction with gender : a case study of a New Zealand University , 2003 .

[21]  P. Knight,et al.  Learning, Curriculum and Employability in Higher Education , 2003 .

[22]  Roger Hadgraft,et al.  Final year engineering projects: Improving assessment, curriculum and supervision to meet AQF8 outcomes , 2014 .