Manufacturing splints for orthognathic surgery using a three-dimensional printer.

OBJECTIVE A new technique for producing splints for orthognathic surgery using a 3D printer is presented. STUDY DESIGN After 3-dimensional (3D) data acquisition by computerized tomography (CT) or cone-beam computerized tomography (CBCT) from patients with orthognathic deformations, it is possible to perform virtual repositioning of the jaws. To reduce artifacts, plaster models were scanned either simultaneously with the patient during the 3D data acquisition or separately using a surface scanner. Importing and combining these data into the preoperative planning situation allows the transformation of the planned repositioning and the ideal occlusion. Setting a virtual splint between the tooth rows makes it possible to encode the repositioning. After performing a boolean operation, tooth impressions are subtracted from the virtual splint. The "definitive" splint is then printed out by a 3D printer. CONCLUSION The presented technique combines the advantages of conventional plaster models, precise virtual 3D planning, and the possibility of transforming the acquired information into a dental splint.

[1]  Paul W Major,et al.  Validity, reliability, and reproducibility of plaster vs digital study models: comparison of peer assessment rating and Bolton analysis and their constituent measurements. , 2006, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[2]  Paul W Major,et al.  Variations in orthodontic treatment planning decisions of Class II patients between virtual 3-dimensional models and traditional plaster study models. , 2006, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[3]  H. Reychler,et al.  Les limites de la chirurgie des modèles en chirurgie orthognathique: implications théoriques et pratiques , 2004 .

[4]  S Hassfeld,et al.  Clinical application of cone beam digital volume tomography in children with cleft lip and palate. , 2006, Dento maxillo facial radiology.

[5]  Vittorio Cacciafesta,et al.  Three-dimensional digital modeling and setup. , 2006, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[6]  Simon T Vlaar,et al.  Accuracy of dental digitizers. , 2006, International dental journal.

[7]  J. Gil,et al.  Predictability of maxillary repositioning during bimaxillary surgery: accuracy of a new technique. , 2007, International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery.

[8]  Hassan Noroozi Introduction of a new orthodontic treatment planning software; a fuzzy logic expert system. , 2006, International journal of orthodontics.

[9]  Ulrich Joos,et al.  Public Domain Computer-Aided Surgery (CAS) in Orthodontic and Maxillofacial Surgery , 2002, Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics / Fortschritte der Kieferorthopädie.

[10]  Takeshi Uchiyama,et al.  Model surgery technique for Le Fort I osteotomy--alteration in occlusal plane associated with upward transposition of posterior maxilla. , 2005, The Bulletin of Tokyo Dental College.

[11]  B. Krug,et al.  Application of an augmented reality tool for maxillary positioning in orthognathic surgery - a feasibility study. , 2006, Journal of cranio-maxillo-facial surgery : official publication of the European Association for Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery.

[12]  Ross J Miller,et al.  Three-dimensional technology improves the range of orthodontic treatment with esthetic and removable aligners. , 2004, World journal of orthodontics.

[13]  Hassan Noroozi,et al.  Orthodontic treatment planning software. , 2006, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[14]  H Reychler,et al.  [Limitations of orthognathic model surgery: theoretical and practical implications]. , 2004, Revue de stomatologie et de chirurgie maxillo-faciale.

[15]  J. Faber,et al.  Rapid prototyping as a tool for diagnosis and treatment planning for maxillary canine impaction. , 2006, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[16]  J Brief,et al.  Clinical indications for digital volume tomography in oral and maxillofacial surgery. , 2002, Dento maxillo facial radiology.

[17]  B. Kusnoto,et al.  Reliability of a 3D surface laser scanner for orthodontic applications. , 2002, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.