Weekly agricultural emissions and ambient concentrations of ammonia: Validation of an emission inventory

Abstract Weekly inventories for emissions of agricultural ammonia were calculated for 139 4 × 4 km grid cells over 52 weeks in the intensely farmed Lower Fraser Valley, BC. The grid cells were located both inside and outside an area that had been depopulated of poultry due to an outbreak of Avian Influenza prior to the start of the study. During the study period, ambient ammonia concentrations were measured hourly at two locations outside the cull area and one location inside the cull area. Large emission differences between grid cells and differences in temporal variation between cells were related to farming practices and meteorological factors such as temperature and rainfall. Weekly average ambient concentrations at the three sampling locations were significantly correlated with estimates of weekly emissions for many of the grid cells in the study area. Inside the cull area, ambient concentrations during the cull (week 1) were 37% of the concentrations after the cull (week 52), while outside the cull there was almost no difference between week 1 and week 52, suggesting that in normal (non-cull) conditions, about 60% of the ambient ammonia was due to poultry farms. Estimated emissions in weeks 1 and 52 for grid cells affected by the cull indicated that over 90% of the emissions came from poultry. The discrepancy in difference between week 1 and 52 for emissions and ambient concentrations could be due to atmospheric factors like transport, atmospheric reactions, dispersion or deposition; to errors in the inventory including farming data, emission factors; and omission of some non-poultry emission sources. Overall the study supports the ammonia emission inventory estimates. Detailed emission data helps in modeling ammonia in the atmosphere and is useful for developing abatement policy.

[1]  P. Hobbs,et al.  Monitoring and modelling trace-gas changes following the 2001 outbreak of Foot and Mouth Disease to reduce the uncertainties in agricultural emissions abatement , 2006 .

[2]  J. Webb,et al.  Reliability of Ammonia Emission Estimates and Abatement Efficiencies , 2009 .

[3]  S. Sheppard,et al.  Farm survey used to guide estimates of nitrogen intake and ammonia emissions for beef cattle, including early season grazing and piosphere effects , 2011 .

[4]  M. Beaulieu,et al.  Ecoregion and farm size differences in feed and manure nitrogen management: 1. Survey methods and results for poultry , 2009 .

[5]  A. Peters,et al.  Particulate Matter Air Pollution and Cardiovascular Disease: An Update to the Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association , 2010, Circulation.

[6]  T. Bruulsema,et al.  Monthly ammonia emissions from fertilizers in 12 Canadian Ecoregions , 2010 .

[7]  S. Sheppard,et al.  Farm practices survey and modelling to estimate monthly NH3 emissions from swine production in 12 Ecoregions of Canada , 2010 .

[8]  Mark R. Theobald,et al.  The potential for spatial planning at the landscape level to mitigate the effects of atmospheric ammonia deposition , 2006 .

[9]  S. Sheppard,et al.  Monthly NH3 emissions from poultry in 12 Ecoregions of Canada , 2009 .

[10]  SheppardS.,et al.  Modelling monthly NH3 emissions from dairy in 12 Ecoregions of Canada , 2011 .

[11]  M. Beaulieu,et al.  Estimation of ammonia emission episodes for a national inventory using a farmer survey and probable number of field working days , 2007 .

[12]  D. Fowler,et al.  The Application of Transects to Assess the Effects of Ammonia on Woodland Groundflora , 2009 .

[13]  H. V. Jaarsveld,et al.  A variable-resolution transport model applied for NHχ in Europe , 1992 .

[14]  S. Sheppard,et al.  Estimated net application of ammoniacal and organic N from manure, and potential for mitigating losses of ammonia in Canada , 2013 .

[15]  D. Fowler,et al.  Linking Ammonia Emission Trends to Measured Concentrations and Deposition of Reduced Nitrogen at Different Scales , 2009 .

[16]  J. Myong Health Effects of Particulate Matter , 2016 .

[17]  BittmanS.,et al.  Farm practices as they affect NH3 emissions from beef cattle , 2012 .