Clothing: Communication, Compliance, and Choice

This study looks at some effects of five different styles of women's clothing: Formal Skirt, Formal Pants, Casual Skirt, Casual Pants, and Jeans. There were no significant differences in compliance to a request to fill out a questionnaire made by experimenters dressed in the five clothing styles, although experimenter age and sex effects were found. Ratings of photographs of the five dress styles indicate that a model was viewed by both male and female subjects as most happy, successful, feminine, interesting, attractive, intelligent, and wanted as a friend when wearing a Formal Skirt outfit and as least so when wearing Jeans. She was also seen as more active when wearing pants as compared with a skirt. Subjects' reasons for choosing what clothing to wear did not indicate that how one will appear to others is the major factor in clothing selection. It appears that clothing does communicate something about the wearer but may influence behavior toward her primarily in the absence of other information about her status.

[1]  M. Harris,et al.  The Language of Altruism: The Effects of Language, Dress, and Ethnic Group , 1973 .

[2]  M. DeLong Dimensions of Visual Perceptions of Clothing , 1978, Perceptual and motor skills.

[3]  P. N. Hamid Style of Dress as a Perceptual Cue in Impression Formation , 1968, Perceptual and motor skills.

[4]  C. Kleinke,et al.  Effects of Dress on Compliance to Requests in a Field Setting , 1977 .

[5]  R. R. Blake,et al.  Status factors in pedestrain violation of traffic signals. , 1955, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[6]  Peter Suedfeld,et al.  Petitioner's Attire and Petition Signing by Peace Demonstrators: A Field Experiment1 , 1971 .

[7]  Howard W. Kroll,et al.  Effect of Appearance on Requests for Help in Libraries , 1977 .

[8]  R. Schiavo,et al.  Effect of Attire on Obtaining Directions , 1974 .

[9]  Petition Signing in a Naturalistic Setting , 1973 .

[10]  M. Harris,et al.  Effects of Uniforms on Perceptions of Pictures of Athletes , 1974 .

[11]  Perception and Creativity in Clothing , 1971, Perceptual and motor skills.

[12]  Leonard Bickman,et al.  The Effect of Social Status on the Honesty of Others , 1971 .

[13]  K. Gibbins Communication Aspects of Women's Clothes and their Relation to Fashionability , 1969 .

[14]  R. Unger,et al.  „The Apparel Oft Proclaims the Man”: Cooperation with Deviant and Conventional Youths , 1972 .

[15]  L. Aiken The Relationships of Dress to Selected Measures of Personality in Undergraduate Women , 1963 .

[16]  Nigel Bryant Petitioning: Dress Congruence Versus Belief Congruence1 , 1975 .

[17]  J. Cooper,et al.  The “Clean for Gene” Phenomenon: The Effect of Students' Appearance on Political Campaigning1 , 1972 .

[18]  M. B. Harris,et al.  Altruism and sex roles. , 1973, Psychological reports.

[19]  H. Giles,et al.  Some behavioural consequences of speech and dress styles , 1979 .

[20]  Lawrence B. Rosenfeld,et al.  Clothing as Communication , 1977 .

[21]  K. Deaux,et al.  Similarity, Sex, and Requests for Small Favors1 , 1971 .

[22]  M. Harris Mediators between frustration and aggression in a field experiment , 1974 .