3D-bioprinted functional and biomimetic hydrogel scaffolds incorporated with nanosilicates to promote bone healing in rat calvarial defect model.
暂无分享,去创建一个
G. Pei | B. Liu | L. Bi | Jingzhi Hu | Hongxun Sang | Yi Gao | Pengzhen Cheng | Donglin Li | Shuaishuai Zhang | Junqin Li | Yue Song | Chunmei Wang | Hao Wu | Xing Lei
[1] Z. Wu,et al. In vitro and in vivo biocompatibility evaluation of a 3D bioprinted gelatin-sodium alginate/rat Schwann-cell scaffold. , 2020, Materials science & engineering. C, Materials for biological applications.
[2] A. Matsuno,et al. Fibrin Glue/Fibronectin/Heparin-Based Delivery System of BMP2 Induces Osteogenesis in MC3T3-E1 Cells and Bone Formation in Rat Calvarial Critical-Sized Defects. , 2020, ACS applied materials & interfaces.
[3] Ishita Matai,et al. Progress in 3D bioprinting technology for tissue/organ regenerative engineering. , 2020, Biomaterials.
[4] S. Hsu,et al. Double network polyurethane-gelatin hydrogel with tunable modulus for high resolution 3D bioprinting. , 2019, ACS applied materials & interfaces.
[5] Wei Yang,et al. Hierarchically Porous Hydroxyapatite Hybrid Scaffold Incorporated with Reduced Graphene Oxide for Rapid Bone Ingrowth and Repair. , 2019, ACS nano.
[6] Y. S. Zhang,et al. Hydrogel Bioink with Multilayered Interfaces Improves Dispersibility of Encapsulated Cells in Extrusion Bioprinting. , 2019, ACS applied materials & interfaces.
[7] B. Feng,et al. Characteristics and toxicity assessment of electrospun gelatin/PCL nanofibrous scaffold loaded with graphene in vitro and in vivo , 2019, International journal of nanomedicine.
[8] J. Massera,et al. Wood-based nanocellulose and bioactive glass modified gelatin–alginate bioinks for 3D bioprinting of bone cells , 2019, Biofabrication.
[9] G. Lin,et al. In Vivo Toxicity Evaluation of PEGylated CuInS2/ZnS Quantum Dots in BALB/c Mice , 2019, Front. Pharmacol..
[10] Akhilesh K Gaharwar,et al. 2D Nanoclay for Biomedical Applications: Regenerative Medicine, Therapeutic Delivery, and Additive Manufacturing , 2019, Advanced materials.
[11] A. Khademhosseini,et al. Microfluidic-enabled bottom-up hydrogels from annealable naturally-derived protein microbeads. , 2019, Biomaterials.
[12] Wei Zhu,et al. Scanningless and continuous 3D bioprinting of human tissues with decellularized extracellular matrix. , 2019, Biomaterials.
[13] Ø. Arlov,et al. Exploitation of Cationic Silica Nanoparticles for Bioprinting of Large-Scale Constructs with High Printing Fidelity. , 2018, ACS applied materials & interfaces.
[14] Jianzhong Fu,et al. Fiber-Based Mini Tissue with Morphology-Controllable GelMA Microfibers. , 2018, Small.
[15] Guoyou Huang,et al. 3D Spatiotemporal Mechanical Microenvironment: A Hydrogel‐Based Platform for Guiding Stem Cell Fate , 2018, Advanced materials.
[16] A. Khademhosseini,et al. Effect of ionic strength on shear-thinning nanoclay-polymer composite hydrogels. , 2018, Biomaterials science.
[17] R. Portugal,et al. Soft Nanohydrogels Based on Laponite Nanodiscs: A Versatile Drug Delivery Platform for Theranostics and Drug Cocktails. , 2018, ACS applied materials & interfaces.
[18] Xiaojun Zhou,et al. Impact of bone marrow mesenchymal stem cell immunomodulation on the osteogenic effects of laponite , 2018, Stem Cell Research & Therapy.
[19] Akhilesh K Gaharwar,et al. Nanoengineered Ionic-Covalent Entanglement (NICE) Bioinks for 3D Bioprinting. , 2018, ACS applied materials & interfaces.
[20] Liming Bian,et al. Nanocomposite hydrogels stabilized by self-assembled multivalent bisphosphonate-magnesium nanoparticles mediate sustained release of magnesium ion and promote in-situ bone regeneration. , 2017, Acta biomaterialia.
[21] Haobo Pan,et al. 3D‐Bioprinted Osteoblast‐Laden Nanocomposite Hydrogel Constructs with Induced Microenvironments Promote Cell Viability, Differentiation, and Osteogenesis both In Vitro and In Vivo , 2017, Advanced science.
[22] Xin Zhao,et al. Functional and Biomimetic Materials for Engineering of the Three-Dimensional Cell Microenvironment. , 2017, Chemical reviews.
[23] David J Mooney,et al. Mechanical confinement regulates cartilage matrix formation by chondrocytes , 2017, Nature materials.
[24] Ali Khademhosseini,et al. Gold Nanocomposite Bioink for Printing 3D Cardiac Constructs , 2017, Advanced functional materials.
[25] M. A. d’Ávila,et al. Laponite as a rheology modifier of alginate solutions: Physical gelation and aging evolution. , 2017, Carbohydrate polymers.
[26] Jin Gao,et al. A shear-thinning hydrogel that extends in vivo bioactivity of FGF2. , 2016, Biomaterials.
[27] Ying-zheng Zhao,et al. An injectable acellular matrix scaffold with absorbable permeable nanoparticles improves the therapeutic effects of docetaxel on glioblastoma. , 2016, Biomaterials.
[28] Lay Poh Tan,et al. Synthesis and Characterization of Types A and B Gelatin Methacryloyl for Bioink Applications , 2016, Materials.
[29] S. Irvine,et al. Bioprinting and Differentiation of Stem Cells , 2016, Molecules.
[30] S. Heilshorn,et al. Bio‐Orthogonally Crosslinked, Engineered Protein Hydrogels with Tunable Mechanics and Biochemistry for Cell Encapsulation , 2016, Advanced functional materials.
[31] Ali Khademhosseini,et al. Nanoengineered biomimetic hydrogels for guiding human stem cell osteogenesis in three dimensional microenvironments. , 2016, Journal of materials chemistry. B.
[32] James J. Yoo,et al. A 3D bioprinting system to produce human-scale tissue constructs with structural integrity , 2016, Nature Biotechnology.
[33] A. Khademhosseini,et al. Synthesis, properties, and biomedical applications of gelatin methacryloyl (GelMA) hydrogels. , 2015, Biomaterials.
[34] James C. Weaver,et al. Hydrogels with tunable stress relaxation regulate stem cell fate and activity , 2015, Nature materials.
[35] David J. Mooney,et al. Matrix Elasticity of Void-Forming Hydrogels Controls Transplanted Stem Cell-Mediated Bone Formation , 2015, Nature materials.
[36] Manish K Jaiswal,et al. Bioactive nanoengineered hydrogels for bone tissue engineering: a growth-factor-free approach. , 2015, ACS nano.
[37] Anthony Atala,et al. 3D bioprinting of tissues and organs , 2014, Nature Biotechnology.
[38] T. Sakai,et al. “Nonswellable” Hydrogel Without Mechanical Hysteresis , 2014, Science.
[39] A. Khademhosseini,et al. Bioactive Silicate Nanoplatelets for Osteogenic Differentiation of Human Mesenchymal Stem Cells , 2013, Advanced materials.
[40] K. Wood,et al. Mesenchymal stromal cells; role in tissue repair, drug discovery and immune modulation. , 2013, Current drug delivery.
[41] J. Chang,et al. Bioactive silicate materials stimulate angiogenesis in fibroblast and endothelial cell co-culture system through paracrine effect. , 2013, Acta biomaterialia.
[42] J. Jansen,et al. Evaluation of bone regeneration using the rat critical size calvarial defect , 2012, Nature Protocols.
[43] A. Caplan,et al. Mesenchymal stem cells: mechanisms of inflammation. , 2011, Annual review of pathology.
[44] Ali Khademhosseini,et al. Controlling the porosity and microarchitecture of hydrogels for tissue engineering. , 2010, Tissue engineering. Part B, Reviews.
[45] Shinji Sakai,et al. An injectable, in situ enzymatically gellable, gelatin derivative for drug delivery and tissue engineering. , 2009, Biomaterials.
[46] Antonios G Mikos,et al. Pre-culture period of mesenchymal stem cells in osteogenic media influences their in vivo bone forming potential. , 2007, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A.
[47] B. Alman,et al. Beta-Catenin Signaling Plays a Disparate Role in Different Phases of Fracture Repair: Implications for Therapy to Improve Bone Healing , 2007, PLoS medicine.
[48] Hans Clevers,et al. Wnt/β-Catenin Signaling in Development and Disease , 2006, Cell.
[49] Armand Keating,et al. Mesenchymal stromal cells , 2006, Stem Cell Biology and Regenerative Medicine.
[50] M. Djabourov,et al. Physically and Chemically Crosslinked Gelatin Gels , 2006 .
[51] D. Bernardini,et al. High concentrations of magnesium modulate vascular endothelial cell behaviour in vitro. , 2004, Biochimica et biophysica acta.
[52] W Cris Wilson,et al. Cell and organ printing 1: protein and cell printers. , 2003, The anatomical record. Part A, Discoveries in molecular, cellular, and evolutionary biology.
[53] G. Karsenty,et al. The osteoblast: a sophisticated fibroblast under central surveillance. , 2000, Science.
[54] M. H. Fernandes,et al. Human bone cell cultures in biocompatibility testing. Part II: effect of ascorbic acid, beta-glycerophosphate and dexamethasone on osteoblastic differentiation. , 2000, Biomaterials.
[55] Allan Bradley,et al. Increased bone formation in osteocalcin-deficient mice , 1996, Nature.
[56] Dong Yun Lee,et al. Hydrogels with an embossed surface: An all-in-one platform for mass production and culture of human adipose-derived stem cell spheroids. , 2019, Biomaterials.
[57] R. Pace,et al. Laponite nanoparticle-associated silated hydroxypropylmethyl cellulose as an injectable reinforced interpenetrating network hydrogel for cartilage tissue engineering. , 2018, Acta biomaterialia.
[58] Haitao Cui,et al. 3D Bioprinting for Organ Regeneration , 2017, Advanced healthcare materials.
[59] Amit Bandyopadhyay,et al. Effect of Chemistry on Osteogenesis and Angiogenesis Towards Bone Tissue Engineering Using 3D Printed Scaffolds , 2016, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.
[60] D. Mooney,et al. Alginate: properties and biomedical applications. , 2012, Progress in polymer science.
[61] W. Butler,et al. The nature and significance of osteopontin. , 1989, Connective tissue research.