Collaborative supply chain practices and performance: exploring the key role of information quality

Purpose - This paper seeks to report the results of a study examining the importance of information quality for the efficacy of collaborative supply chain practices. Design/methodology/approach - A questionnaire was sent to procurement managers throughout the supply chain within the German automotive industry. Regression analyses illustrate the differences in performance of collaborative practices under high and low information quality scenarios. Findings - The study illustrates that the impact of collaborative supply chain practices (i.e. information sharing, incentive alignment, joint-decision making) on performance varies significantly depending on the quality of information that is exchanged throughout the supply chain. Specifically, whilst information sharing improves operational performance when low and high quality information is exchanged, incentive alignment and joint decision making only improve operational performance when the information is of high quality. Originality/value - Although research on the performance impact of collaborative supply chain practices has advanced over the past decade, there is still a scarcity of research acknowledging the multidimensional nature of collaboration. Additionally, the importance of information quality for the success of collaborative practices has not been firmly established. The paper addresses this void in the literature by reporting results of an empirical study examining collaborative supply chains and practices within the German automotive industry. The paper will thus be beneficial to supply chain managers considering collaborative practices and will support further empirical research work in the collaborative supply chain research field.

[1]  G. Chow Tests of equality between sets of coefficients in two linear regressions (econometrics voi 28 , 1960 .

[2]  J. Scott Armstrong,et al.  Estimating nonresponse bias in mail surveys. , 1977 .

[3]  J. Nunnally,et al.  Psychometric Theory: NY. , 1978 .

[4]  Peter E. Kennedy A Guide to Econometrics , 1979 .

[5]  P. Bentler,et al.  Significance Tests and Goodness of Fit in the Analysis of Covariance Structures , 1980 .

[6]  C. Fornell,et al.  Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. , 1981 .

[7]  David Fairley,et al.  Testing for the Potential for Nonresponse Bias in Sample Surveys , 1985 .

[8]  D. Schweiger,et al.  Group Approaches for Improving Strategic Decision Making: A Comparative Analysis of Dialectical Inquiry, Devil's Advocacy, and Consensus , 1986 .

[9]  James C. Anderson,et al.  STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING IN PRACTICE: A REVIEW AND RECOMMENDED TWO-STEP APPROACH , 1988 .

[10]  Kenneth A. Bollen,et al.  Structural Equations with Latent Variables , 1989 .

[11]  S. Mulaik,et al.  EVALUATION OF GOODNESS-OF-FIT INDICES FOR STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELS , 1989 .

[12]  Robert F. DeVellis,et al.  Scale Development: Theory and Applications. , 1992 .

[13]  James C. Anderson,et al.  Monte Carlo Evaluations of Goodness of Fit Indices for Structural Equation Models , 1992 .

[14]  A. Roth,et al.  A taxonomy of manufacturing strategies , 1994 .

[15]  Chee-Chuong Sum,et al.  Business environment, operations strategy, and performance: An empirical study of Singapore manufacturers☆ , 1995 .

[16]  John T. Mentzer,et al.  Logistics and interdepartmental integration , 1996 .

[17]  Holmes Miller,et al.  The Multiple Dimensions of Information Quality , 1996, Inf. Syst. Manag..

[18]  R. Handfield,et al.  Success factors in strategic supplier alliances: The buying company perspective , 1998 .

[19]  R. Narasimhan,et al.  Causal Linkages in Supply Chain Management: An Exploratory Study of North American Manufacturing Firms , 1998 .

[20]  L. V. Wassenhove,et al.  Partnerships to Improve Supply Chains , 1999 .

[21]  Paul Ireland,et al.  Satisficing dependent customers: on the power of suppliers in IT systems integration supply chains , 1999 .

[22]  Joseph P. Cannon,et al.  Buyer–Seller Relationships in Business Markets , 1999 .

[23]  Darryl D. Wilson,et al.  Supply management orientation and supplier/buyer performance , 2000 .

[24]  Stefano Tonchia,et al.  Performance measurement systems - Models, characteristics and measures , 2001 .

[25]  Mauro Caputo,et al.  The nature of buyer‐supplier relationships in co‐design activities: The Italian auto industry case , 2002 .

[26]  M. Frohlich,et al.  Arcs of integration: an international study of supply chain strategies , 2001 .

[27]  P. Daugherty,et al.  SUPPLY CHAIN COLLABORATION AND LOGISTICAL SERVICE PERFORMANCE , 2001 .

[28]  Laura Horvath Collaboration: the key to value creation in supply chain management , 2001 .

[29]  R. Narasimhan,et al.  Effect of supply chain integration on the relationship between diversification and performance: evidence from Japanese and Korean firms , 2002 .

[30]  T. Simatupang,et al.  THE COLLABORATIVE SUPPLY CHAIN. , 2002 .

[31]  Ajay Das,et al.  Relative importance of contingency variables for advanced manufacturing technology , 2003 .

[32]  S. Vickery,et al.  The effects of an integrative supply chain strategy on customer service and financial performance: an analysis of direct versus indirect relationships , 2003 .

[33]  Scott B. MacKenzie,et al.  Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. , 2003, The Journal of applied psychology.

[34]  Mark Pagell,et al.  Understanding the factors that enable and inhibit the integration of operations, purchasing and logistics , 2004 .

[35]  M. Barratt Understanding the meaning of collaboration in the supply chain , 2004 .

[36]  Kevin Zhu,et al.  The Complementarity of Information Technology Infrastructure and E-Commerce Capability: A Resource-Based Assessment of Their Business Value , 2004, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[37]  Leslie P. Willcocks,et al.  IT and business process outsourcing: the knowledge potential , 2004 .

[38]  Omar El Sawy,et al.  Coordinating for Flexibility in e-Business Supply Chains , 2004, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[39]  T. Simatupang,et al.  The collaboration index: a measure for supply chain collaboration , 2005 .

[40]  P. K. Bagchi,et al.  Supply chain integration : a European survey , 2005 .

[41]  B. Çatay,et al.  Competition through collaboration: insights from an initiative in the Turkish textile supply chain , 2005 .

[42]  Omar El Sawy,et al.  Absorptive Capacity Configurations in Supply Chains: Gearing for Partner-Enabled Market Knowledge Creation , 2005, MIS Q..

[43]  R. Narasimhan,et al.  Supplier integration—Finding an optimal configuration , 2006 .

[44]  A. Vereecke,et al.  Performance improvement through supply chain collaboration in Europe , 2006 .

[45]  A. Fearne,et al.  Implanting the benefits of buyer‐supplier collaboration in the soft fruit sector , 2006 .

[46]  M. Vlachopoulou,et al.  A conceptual framework for supply chain collaboration: empirical evidence from the agri‐food industry , 2007 .

[47]  Donald F. Rossin,et al.  An Exploratory Analysis of Information Quality in Supply Chains: Efficient and Responsive Models , 2007 .

[48]  Helena Forslund,et al.  Measuring information quality in the order fulfilment process , 2007 .

[49]  N. Sanders An empirical study of the impact of e-business technologies on organizational collaboration and performance , 2007 .

[50]  N. Sanders Pattern of information technology use: The impact on buyer–suppler coordination and performance , 2008 .

[51]  Christine Legner,et al.  Toward the Inter-organizational Product Information Supply Chain - Evidence from the Retail and Consumer Goods Industries , 2008, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[52]  Carl Wänström,et al.  Assessing information quality in manufacturing planning and control processes , 2009 .

[53]  Rajiv Singh Clinical governance in operation – everybody's business: a proposed framework , 2009 .

[54]  Prakash J. Singh,et al.  The nature and effectiveness of collaboration between firms, their customers and suppliers: a supply chain perspective , 2009 .

[55]  Daniel F. Lynch,et al.  Examining supply chain relationships: Do buyer and supplier perspectives on collaborative relationships differ? , 2010 .

[56]  Pietro Romano,et al.  Relationship between downstream integration, performance measurement systems and supply network efficiency , 2012 .