Geodesign dynamics for sustainable urban watershed development

Abstract Sustainable urban development is considered a complex problem. Geodesign applies systems thinking to such problems using a dynamic and collaborative process wherein iteration is necessary to address diverse objectives. Preparation and execution of a two-day research workshop explored two aspects of geodesign dynamics using a new software platform called GeodesignHub.com . One aspect of dynamics concerned the cross-systems influence of proposed projects and policies as related to ten systems (e.g. transportation, housing, surface water, forest preserves etc.) influencing watershed sustainability in King County, Washington. A second aspect investigated the interaction among six multi-disciplinary design teams and each pursuing different considerations in decision workflow processes. A decision workflow called the Steinitz Geodesign Framework was scoped, designed, and implemented to address meaningful and substantive policy and project proposals for achieving consensus on a 40-year plan design. Workshop participants addressed targets among ten subsystems for sustainable urban development. Findings suggest the software provided support for high-performance collaboration when teams moved toward their targets and when negotiating to achieve a single plan outcome, but the urban growth areas and or housing densities established through policy are likely in need of reconsideration to accommodate population growth. Conclusions about findings and prospects for future research are provided.

[1]  G. A. Miller THE PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW THE MAGICAL NUMBER SEVEN, PLUS OR MINUS TWO: SOME LIMITS ON OUR CAPACITY FOR PROCESSING INFORMATION 1 , 1956 .

[2]  Shaowen Wang,et al.  CyberGIS software: a synthetic review and integration roadmap , 2013, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..

[3]  Timothy L. Nyerges,et al.  CyberGIS design considerations for structured participation in collaborative problem solving , 2013, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..

[4]  Piotr Jankowski,et al.  Design Considerations and Evaluation of a Collaborative, Spatio-Temporal Decision Support System , 2006, Trans. GIS.

[5]  Ramanathan Sugumaran,et al.  Spatial Decision Support Systems: Principles and Practices , 2010 .

[6]  P. Nijkamp,et al.  Sustainable Urban Development. The Environmental Assessment , 2007 .

[7]  Andrew R.J. Dainty,et al.  Sustainability and resilience in the built environment: The challenges of establishing a turquoise agenda in the UK , 2015 .

[8]  M. Campagna GIS for Sustainable Development , 2005 .

[9]  Timothy L. Nyerges,et al.  Foundations of sustainability information representation theory: spatial–temporal dynamics of sustainable systems , 2014, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..

[10]  Piotr Jankowski,et al.  Regional and Urban GIS: A Decision Support Approach , 2009 .

[11]  Carl Steinitz Beginnings of Geodesign: a personal historical perspective , 2016 .

[12]  Leonidas Anthopoulos,et al.  Eco-cities: An integrated system dynamics framework and a concise research taxonomy , 2015 .

[13]  Carl Steinitz,et al.  A Framework for Theory Applicable to the Education of Landscape Architects (and Other Environmental Design Professionals) , 1990, Landscape Journal.

[14]  Lewis D. Hopkins Planning support systems for cities and regions , 2011, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..

[15]  Carl Steinitz Which Way of Designing , 2014 .

[16]  Robert W. Kates,et al.  From the Unity of Nature to Sustainability Science: Ideas and Practice , 2012 .

[17]  H. Rittel,et al.  Dilemmas in a general theory of planning , 1973 .

[18]  Ron Janssen,et al.  Comparison of Geodesign Tools to Communicate Stakeholder Values , 2015 .

[19]  L. D. Hopkins,et al.  Urban Development: The Logic Of Making Plans , 2001 .

[20]  G. Brundtland,et al.  Our common future , 1987 .

[21]  Herbert A. Simon,et al.  The new science of management decision , 1960 .

[22]  Timothy L. Nyerges,et al.  Design Considerations for an Internet Portal to Support Public Participation in Transportation Improvement Decision Making , 2006 .

[23]  H. Fineberg,et al.  Understanding Risk: Informing Decisions in a Democratic Society , 1996 .

[24]  Greg Brown,et al.  Key issues and research priorities for public participation GIS (PPGIS): A synthesis based on empirical research , 2014 .

[25]  P. Stern,et al.  Decision making for the environment : social and behavioral science research priorities , 2005 .

[26]  R. Kasperson,et al.  Sustainability Science , 2019, Critical Skills for Environmental Professionals.

[27]  R. Klosterman Planning Support Systems: A New Perspective on Computer-Aided Planning , 1997 .

[28]  Carl Steinitz The beginnings of geographical information systems: a personal historical perspective , 2014 .

[29]  Theodore H. Grossardt,et al.  Structured Public Involvement: Problems and Prospects for Improvement , 2003 .

[30]  Timothy L. Nyerges,et al.  Public Participation in Analytic-Deliberative Decision Making: Evaluating a Large-Group Online Field Experiment , 2011 .

[31]  Ian D. Bishop,et al.  Planning support : Hardware and software in search of a system , 1998 .

[32]  Carveth Read,et al.  Logic: Deductive and Inductive , 2003 .