Truthfulness and Approximation with Value-Maximizing Bidders

In many markets bidders want to maximize value rather than payoff. This is different to the quasi-linear utility functions, and leads to different strategies and outcomes. We refer to bidders who maximize value as value bidders. While simple single-object auction formats are truthful for value bidders, standard multi-object auction formats allow for manipulation. It is straightforward to show that there cannot be a truthful and revenue-maximizing deterministic auction mechanism with value bidders and general valuations. Using approximation as a means to achieve truthfulness, we study truthful approximation mechanisms for value bidders. We show that the approximation ratio that can be achieved with a deterministic and truthful approximation mechanism with n bidders and m items cannot be higher than 1 / n for general valuations. For randomized approximation mechanisms there is a framework with a ratio of \(O(\frac{\sqrt{m}}{\epsilon ^3})\) with probability at least \(1-\epsilon \), for \(0<\epsilon <1\).

[1]  Shahar Dobzinski,et al.  On the Power of Randomization in Algorithmic Mechanism Design , 2009, 2009 50th Annual IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science.

[2]  Weinan Zhang,et al.  Optimal real-time bidding for display advertising , 2014, KDD.

[3]  Moshe Babaioff,et al.  Single-value combinatorial auctions and algorithmic implementation in undominated strategies , 2009, JACM.

[4]  M. Satterthwaite Strategy-proofness and Arrow's conditions: Existence and correspondence theorems for voting procedures and social welfare functions , 1975 .

[5]  Kousha Etessami,et al.  Recursive Markov chains, stochastic grammars, and monotone systems of nonlinear equations , 2005, JACM.

[6]  Jan Kratochvíl,et al.  Independent Sets with Domination Constraints , 2000, Discret. Appl. Math..

[7]  Noam Nisan,et al.  Truthful randomized mechanisms for combinatorial auctions , 2012, J. Comput. Syst. Sci..

[8]  D. Gale,et al.  Multi-Item Auctions , 1986, Journal of Political Economy.

[9]  Moshe Tennenholtz,et al.  Bundling equilibrium in combinatorial auctions , 2002, Games Econ. Behav..

[10]  A. Gibbard Manipulation of Voting Schemes: A General Result , 1973 .

[11]  Jon Feldman,et al.  A Truthful Mechanism for Offline Ad Slot Scheduling , 2008, SAGT.

[12]  Ron Lavi,et al.  Algorithmic Game Theory: Computationally Efficient Approximation Mechanisms , 2007 .

[13]  D. Lehmann,et al.  The Winner Determination Problem , 2003 .

[14]  Chaitanya Swamy,et al.  Truthful and near-optimal mechanism design via linear programming , 2005, 46th Annual IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (FOCS'05).