Assessing Movement Factors in Upper Limb Kinematics Decoding from EEG Signals

The past decades have seen the rapid development of upper limb kinematics decoding techniques by performing intracortical recordings of brain signals. However, the use of non-invasive approaches to perform similar decoding procedures is still in its early stages. Recent studies show that there is a correlation between electroencephalographic (EEG) signals and hand-reaching kinematic parameters. From these studies, it could be concluded that the accuracy of upper limb kinematics decoding depends, at least partially, on the characteristics of the performed movement. In this paper, we have studied upper limb movements with different speeds and trajectories in a controlled environment to analyze the influence of movement variability in the decoding performance. To that end, low frequency components of the EEG signals have been decoded with linear models to obtain the position of the volunteer’s hand during performed trajectories grasping the end effector of a planar manipulandum. The results confirm that it is possible to obtain kinematic information from low frequency EEG signals and show that decoding performance is significantly influenced by movement variability and tracking accuracy as continuous and slower movements improve the accuracy of the decoder. This is a key factor that should be taken into account in future experimental designs.

[1]  Trent J. Bradberry,et al.  Reconstructing Three-Dimensional Hand Movements from Noninvasive Electroencephalographic Signals , 2010, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[2]  Trent J. Bradberry,et al.  Fast attainment of computer cursor control with noninvasively acquired brain signals , 2011, Journal of neural engineering.

[3]  Jon A. Mukand,et al.  Neuronal ensemble control of prosthetic devices by a human with tetraplegia , 2006, Nature.

[4]  Andrew S. Whitford,et al.  Cortical control of a prosthetic arm for self-feeding , 2008, Nature.

[5]  Michael J. Black,et al.  Point-and-Click Cursor Control With an Intracortical Neural Interface System by Humans With Tetraplegia , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[6]  N. Birbaumer,et al.  On the Usage of Linear Regression Models to Reconstruct Limb Kinematics from Low Frequency EEG Signals , 2013, PloS one.

[7]  Miguel A. L. Nicolelis,et al.  Actions from thoughts , 2001, Nature.

[8]  José Luis Contreras-Vidal,et al.  Reconstructing hand kinematics during reach to grasp movements from electroencephalographic signals , 2011, 2011 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[9]  Nicolas Y. Masse,et al.  Reach and grasp by people with tetraplegia using a neurally controlled robotic arm , 2012, Nature.

[10]  David M. Santucci,et al.  Learning to Control a Brain–Machine Interface for Reaching and Grasping by Primates , 2003, PLoS biology.

[11]  Gernot R. Müller-Putz,et al.  Decoding of velocities and positions of 3D arm movement from EEG , 2012, 2012 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[12]  J. Wolpaw,et al.  Clinical Applications of Brain-Computer Interfaces: Current State and Future Prospects , 2009, IEEE Reviews in Biomedical Engineering.

[13]  Dennis J. McFarland,et al.  Brain–computer interfaces for communication and control , 2002, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[14]  Moritz Grosse-Wentrup,et al.  Using brain–computer interfaces to induce neural plasticity and restore function , 2011, Journal of neural engineering.

[15]  Rodolphe J. Gentili,et al.  Reply to comment on 'Fast attainment of computer cursor control with noninvasively acquired brain signals' , 2011 .

[16]  Gernot R. Müller-Putz,et al.  Brain-computer interfaces for control of neuroprostheses: from synchronous to asynchronous mode of operation / Brain-Computer Interfaces zur Steuerung von Neuroprothesen: von der synchronen zur asynchronen Funktionsweise , 2006 .

[17]  Jonathan R Wolpaw,et al.  Brain–computer interface systems: progress and prospects , 2007, Expert review of medical devices.

[18]  Andrés Úbeda,et al.  Mental tasks-based brain-robot interface , 2010, Robotics Auton. Syst..

[19]  P. Duncan,et al.  Measurement of Motor Recovery After Stroke: Outcome Assessment and Sample Size Requirements , 1992, Stroke.

[20]  Riccardo Poli,et al.  Comment on 'fast attainment of computer cursor control with noninvasively acquired brain signals'. , 2011, Journal of neural engineering.

[21]  R. Johansson,et al.  Eye–Hand Coordination in Object Manipulation , 2001, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[22]  C. Neuper,et al.  Combining Brain–Computer Interfaces and Assistive Technologies: State-of-the-Art and Challenges , 2010, Front. Neurosci..

[23]  A. Schwartz,et al.  High-performance neuroprosthetic control by an individual with tetraplegia , 2013, The Lancet.

[24]  Andrés Úbeda,et al.  Visual evoked potential-based brain-machine interface applications to assist disabled people , 2012, Expert Syst. Appl..

[25]  J. Wolpaw,et al.  Brain–computer interfaces in neurological rehabilitation , 2008, The Lancet Neurology.