Engaging older adults in healthcare research and planning: a realist synthesis

Plain English summaryThe importance of citizen involvement in healthcare research and planning has been widely recognized. There is however, a lack of understanding of how best to engage older adults, Canada's fastest growing segment of the population and biggest users of the healthcare system. We aimed to address this gap by developing an understanding of the engagement of older adults and their caregivers in healthcare research and planning. We conducted a review of available knowledge on engagement in healthcare research and planning with a focus on older adults and their caregivers. A five stage engagement framework emerged from this study that can be used to guide engagement efforts. We are continuing to collaborate with older adults and decision makers to develop and test strategies based on the presented framework.AbstractBackground The importance of engaging the community in healthcare research and planning has been widely recognized. Currently however, there is a limited focus on older adults, Canada’s fastest growing segment of the population and biggest users of the healthcare system. Objective This project aimed to develop an understanding of engagement of older adults and their caregivers in healthcare research and planning. Method A realist synthesis was conducted of the available knowledge on engagement in healthcare research and planning. The search methodology was informed by a framework for realist syntheses following five phases, including consultations with older adults. The synthesis included theoretical frameworks, and both peer-reviewed and grey literature. Results The search generated 15,683 articles, with 562 focusing on healthcare research and planning. The review lead to the development of a framework to engage older adults and their caregivers in healthcare research and planning. The 5 stages environment, plan, establish, build, and transition are accompanied with example context, mechanism, and outcomes to guide the use of this framework. Conclusion We have identified a framework that promotes meaningful engagement of older adults and their caregivers. We are continuing to collaborate with our community partners to further develop and evaluate engagement strategies that align with the presented framework.

[1]  Eva Lidén,et al.  Patient participation in discharge planning conference , 2014, International journal of integrated care.

[2]  S. Oliver,et al.  Consumer involvement in the health technology assessment program , 2004, International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care.

[3]  Rebecca R. Cheezum,et al.  Community-based participatory research: a capacity-building approach for policy advocacy aimed at eliminating health disparities. , 2010, American journal of public health.

[4]  E. Yuen,et al.  Partnering to Collect Health Services and Public Health Data in Hard-to-Reach Communities: A Community-Based Participatory Research Approach for Collecting Community Health Data , 2010, Progress in community health partnerships : research, education, and action.

[5]  C. Gwede,et al.  Designing a Community-Based Lay Health Advisor Training Curriculum to Address Cancer Health Disparities , 2013, Health promotion practice.

[6]  Paul Dieppe,et al.  Relation between agendas of the research community and the research consumer , 2000, The Lancet.

[7]  H. Dawkins,et al.  Informing public health policy through deliberative public engagement: perceived impact on participants and citizen-government relations. , 2013, Genetic testing and molecular biomarkers.

[8]  G. Gargioni.  Community healthcare programmes: empowering people to improve access to prevention and care , 2010 .

[9]  P. Tobin,et al.  Community-based health research led by the Vuntut Gwitchin First Nation , 2011, International journal of circumpolar health.

[10]  M. Ford,et al.  Training Partnership Dyads for Community-Based Participatory Research , 2013, Health promotion practice.

[11]  S. Couzos,et al.  ‘We are Not Just Participants—We are in Charge’: The NACCHO Ear Trial and the Process for Aboriginal Community-controlled Health Research , 2005, Ethnicity & health.

[12]  William M. K. Trochim,et al.  Concept mapping: an introduction to structured conceptualization in health care. , 2005, International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care.

[13]  C. Jenkins,et al.  Beyond the Medical Model: Interdisciplinary Programs of Community‐Engaged Health Research , 2011, Clinical and translational science.

[14]  Ray Pawson,et al.  RAMESES publication standards: realist syntheses , 2013, BMC Medicine.

[15]  D. Gough,et al.  Clarifying differences between review designs and methods , 2012, Systematic Reviews.

[16]  Paul Meissner,et al.  A New Taxonomy for Stakeholder Engagement in Patient-Centered Outcomes Research , 2012, Journal of General Internal Medicine.

[17]  S. Arnstein,et al.  Ladder of Citizen Participation , 2020 .

[18]  A. Draper,et al.  Using Participatory Approaches with Older People in a Residential Home in Guyana: Challenges and Tensions , 2012, Journal of Cross-Cultural Gerontology.

[19]  S. Glouberman,et al.  Choosing Healthcare Options by Involving Canada's Elderly: a protocol for the CHOICE realist synthesis project on engaging older persons in healthcare decision-making , 2015, BMJ Open.

[20]  C. Grogan,et al.  Residents' perceptions of effective community representation in local health decision-making. , 2012, Social science & medicine.

[21]  M. Holosko,et al.  How service users become empowered in human service organizations: the empowerment model. , 2001, International journal of health care quality assurance incorporating Leadership in health services.

[22]  A. Tricco,et al.  What is the most appropriate knowledge synthesis method to conduct a review? Protocol for a scoping review , 2012, BMC Medical Research Methodology.

[23]  C-L Huang,et al.  Community health development: what is it? , 2005, International nursing review.

[24]  Jonathan Sussman,et al.  Of time and troubles: Patient involvement and the production of health care disparities , 2012, Health.

[25]  Norma Daykin,et al.  Developing user involvement in a UK cancer network: professionals’ and users’ perspectives , 2004 .

[26]  Nicole Ruggiano.  Consumer Direction in Long-Term Care Policy: Overcoming Barriers to Promoting Older Adults' Opportunity for Self-Direction , 2012, Journal of gerontological social work.

[27]  Colin Camerer,et al.  Not So Different After All: A Cross-Discipline View Of Trust , 1998 .

[28]  N. Goodwin,et al.  What are the principles that underpin integrated care? , 2014, International journal of integrated care.

[29]  M. Fitch,et al.  From Patient to Participant: Enhancing the Validity and Ethics of Cancer Research through Participatory Research , 2013, Journal of Cancer Education.

[30]  G. White,et al.  Consumers as Collaborators in Research and Action , 2001, People with Disabilities.

[31]  Broden Giambrone,et al.  'About time!' Insights from Research with Pride: a community-student collaboration. , 2012, Health promotion international.

[32]  V. Dickson-Swift,et al.  Community participation in rural health: a scoping review , 2013, BMC Health Services Research.

[33]  Douglas D. Perkins.  Speaking truth to power: Empowerment ideology as social intervention and policy , 1995, American journal of community psychology.

[34]  L. London,et al.  Implementing community participation through legislative reform: a study of the policy framework for community participation in the Western Cape province of South Africa , 2012, BMC International Health and Human Rights.

[35]  J. Higgins.  Closer to Home: The Case for Experiential Participation in Health Reform , 1999, Canadian Journal of Public Health.

[36]  G. Heckman.  Integrated care for the frail elderly. , 2011, HealthcarePapers.

[37]  Trudy van der Weijden,et al.  Patient and public involvement in clinical guidelines: international experiences and future perspectives , 2010, Quality and Safety in Health Care.

[38]  A. Nauta,et al.  Factors predicting trust between GPs and OPs , 2001, International journal of integrated care.

[39]  K. Middleton,et al.  Patients’ and Community Leaders’ Perceptions Regarding Conducting Health Behavior Research in a Diverse, Urban Clinic Specializing in Rheumatic Diseases , 2012, Progress in community health partnerships : research, education, and action.

[40]  A. Casebeer,et al.  Will it make a difference if I show up and share? A citizens' perspective on improving public involvement processes for health system decision-making , 2004, Journal of health services research & policy.

[41]  J. Slaets,et al.  Inclusion of frail elderly patients in clinical trials: solutions to the problems. , 2013, Journal of geriatric oncology.

[42]  H. V. van Stel,et al.  Multidisciplinary integrated Parent and Child Centres in Amsterdam: a qualitative study , 2013, International journal of integrated care.

[43]  Engaging the Deaf American Sign Language Community: Lessons From a Community-Based Participatory Research Center , 2012, Progress in community health partnerships : research, education, and action.

[44]  D. Wilkin,et al.  Are primary care groups and trusts consulting local communities? , 2002, Health & social care in the community.

[45]  P. Powell,et al.  From tokenism to meaningful engagement: best practices in patient involvement in an EU project , 2015, Research Involvement and Engagement.

[46]  D. Lüdecke.  Patient centredness in integrated care: results of a qualitative study based on a systems theoretical framework , 2014, International journal of integrated care.

[47]  J Gabbay,et al.  Involving consumers in research and development agenda setting for the NHS: developing an evidence-based approach. , 2004, Health technology assessment.

[48]  T. Greenhalgh,et al.  Realist review - a new method of systematic review designed for complex policy interventions , 2005, Journal of health services research & policy.

[49]  H. Kendig,et al.  Involving older people in community‐based research: Developing a guiding framework for researchers and community organisations , 2009, Australasian journal on ageing.

[50]  J. Boote,et al.  What does it mean to involve consumers successfully in NHS research? A consensus study , 2004, Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy.

[51]  Moving beyond good intentions: Indigenous participation in Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander health research , 2005, Australian and New Zealand journal of public health.

[52]  I. Graham.  Knowledge synthesis and the Canadian Institutes of Health Research , 2012, Systematic Reviews.

[53]  Sally Brearley,et al.  Involving older people in research: methodological issues. , 2005, Health & social care in the community.

[54]  W. Doherty,et al.  Citizen health care: A model for engaging patients, families, and communities as coproducers of health. , 2006 .

[55]  B. Israel,et al.  Can communities and academia work together on public health research? Evaluation results from a community-based participatory research partnershipin detroit , 2001, Journal of Urban Health.

[56]  Roland Bal,et al.  Inter-organisational communication networks in healthcare: centralised versus decentralised approaches , 2007, International journal of integrated care.

[57]  Andrew D Oxman,et al.  SUPPORT Tools for evidence-informed health Policymaking (STP) 15: Engaging the public in evidence-informed policymaking , 2009, Health research policy and systems.

[58]  M. Markle-Reid,et al.  Interprofessional partnerships in chronic illness care: a conceptual model for measuring partnership effectiveness , 2008, International journal of integrated care.

[59]  Douglas G. Altman,et al.  Practical statistics for medical research , 1990 .

[60]  J. Grimshaw,et al.  Understanding the relationship between the perceived characteristics of clinical practice guidelines and their uptake: protocol for a realist review , 2011, Implementation science : IS.

[61]  J. Sloan,et al.  Patient engagement in research: a systematic review , 2014, BMC Health Services Research.

[62]  T. Abma,et al.  Patient issues in health research and quality of care: an inventory and data synthesis , 2013, Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy.

[63]  M. Slade,et al.  The contribution of advisory committees and public involvement to large studies: case study , 2010, BMC health services research.

[64]  Carol R. Horowitz,et al.  Community-Based Participatory Research From the Margin to the Mainstream: Are Researchers Prepared? , 2009, Circulation.

[65]  Sandy Oliver,et al.  Patients’ and clinicians’ research priorities , 2011, Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy.

[66]  Charlotte Paterson,et al.  'Take small steps to go a long way' consumer involvement in research into complementary and alternative therapies. , 2004, Complementary therapies in nursing & midwifery.

[67]  C. Charles,et al.  From rhetoric to reality: including patient voices in supportive cancer care planning , 2005, Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy.

[68]  Trisha Greenhalgh,et al.  Protocol - realist and meta-narrative evidence synthesis: Evolving Standards (RAMESES) , 2011, BMC medical research methodology.

[69]  J. Boote,et al.  Public involvement in the systematic review process in health and social care: a narrative review of case examples. , 2011, Health policy.

[70]  S. Staniszewska,et al.  The PRIME project: developing a patient evidence‐base , 2010, Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy.

[71]  K. Graham,et al.  Community Action Research: Who Does What to Whom and Why? Lessons Learned from Local Prevention Efforts (International Experiences) , 2000, Substance use & misuse.

[72]  M. D. de Wit,et al.  European League Against Rheumatism recommendations for the inclusion of patient representatives in scientific projects , 2011, Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases.

[73]  J. Sweeney,et al.  Patient and family engagement: a framework for understanding the elements and developing interventions and policies. , 2013, Health affairs.

[74]  N. Lightfoot,et al.  Thinking outside the box: Aboriginal people's suggestions for conducting health studies with Aboriginal communities. , 2011, Public health.

[75]  Peter J. Smith.  A transdisciplinary approach to research on work and health: What is it, what could it contribute, and what are the challenges? , 2007 .

[76]  T. Greenhalgh,et al.  Realist synthesis - an introduction , 2004 .

[77]  S. Jaglal,et al.  Communicating during care transitions for older hip fracture patients: family caregiver and health care provider's perspectives , 2013, International journal of integrated care.

[78]  A. Adams,et al.  Learning to work together: developing academic and community research partnerships. , 2004, WMJ : official publication of the State Medical Society of Wisconsin.

[79]  J. Morone,et al.  Power to the People? Restoring Citizen Participation , 2003, Journal of health politics, policy and law.

[80]  K. Dickersin,et al.  Consumer involvement in systematic reviews of comparative effectiveness research , 2013, Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy.

[81]  S. Harrison,et al.  Involving patients in research: setting up a service users' advisory group. , 2001, Journal of management in medicine.

[82]  J. Andrews,et al.  Partnership readiness for community-based participatory research. , 2012, Health education research.

[83]  A. Mühlbacher,et al.  Patient-centredness in integrated healthcare delivery systems - needs, expectations and priorities for organised healthcare systems , 2013, International journal of integrated care.

[84]  J. Lenaghan,et al.  Involving the public in rationing decisions. The experience of citizens juries. , 1999, Health policy.