How choice modifies preference: Neural correlates of choice justification

When making a difficult choice, people often justify the choice by increasing their liking for the chosen object and decreasing their liking for the rejected object. To uncover the neural signatures of choice justification, we used functional magnetic resonance imaging to monitor neural activity when subjects rated their preference for chosen and rejected musical CDs before and after they made their choices. We observed that the trial-by-trial attitude change (i.e., increase of preference for chosen items and decrease of preference for rejected items) was predicted by post-choice activity in the ventral medial prefrontal cortex (MPFC), right temporal-parietal junction, anterior insula, and bilateral cerebellum. Furthermore, individual difference in choice justification (i.e., increased preference for chosen items minus decreased preference for rejected items) was predicted by post-choice neural activity in the dorsal MPFC, left lateral prefrontal cortex, and right precentral cortex positively. In addition, interdependent self-construal was correlated with decreased activity in the ventral MPFC in the post-choice than pre-choice sessions. These findings suggest that both negative arousal/regulation and self-reflection are associated with choice justification. This provides evidence for the self-threat theory of choice justification.

[1]  P. Glimcher,et al.  The neural correlates of subjective value during intertemporal choice , 2007, Nature Neuroscience.

[2]  L. Festinger,et al.  A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance , 2017 .

[3]  M. Lieberman Social Cognitive Neuroscience , 2010 .

[4]  R Saxe,et al.  People thinking about thinking people The role of the temporo-parietal junction in “theory of mind” , 2003, NeuroImage.

[5]  James T. Tedeschi,et al.  1 – Identities, the Phenomenal Self, and Laboratory Research , 1981 .

[6]  V. Michel,et al.  An Automatic Valuation System in the Human Brain: Evidence from Functional Neuroimaging , 2009, Neuron.

[7]  Matthew D. Lieberman,et al.  The neural correlates of implicit and explicit self-relevant processing , 2010, NeuroImage.

[8]  S. Kitayama,et al.  SOCial EyES aNd CHOiCE JuSTifiCaTiON: CulTurE aNd diSSONaNCE rEviSiTEd , 2010 .

[9]  Uta Frith,et al.  Theory of mind , 2001, Current Biology.

[10]  X. Gu,et al.  Neural consequences of religious belief on self-referential processing , 2008, Social neuroscience.

[11]  C. Frith,et al.  The Neural Basis of Mentalizing , 2006, Neuron.

[12]  T. Singelis,et al.  The Measurement of Independent and Interdependent Self-Construals , 1994 .

[13]  J. Decety,et al.  The Role of the Right Temporoparietal Junction in Social Interaction: How Low-Level Computational Processes Contribute to Meta-Cognition , 2007, The Neuroscientist : a review journal bringing neurobiology, neurology and psychiatry.

[14]  H. Markus,et al.  Is There Any “Free” Choice? , 2004, Psychological science.

[15]  Janice Redish,et al.  Task analysis , 2002 .

[16]  D. R. Lehman,et al.  Culture, Dissonance, and Self-Affirmation , 1997 .

[17]  J. O'Doherty,et al.  Marketing actions can modulate neural representations of experienced pleasantness , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[18]  H. Markus,et al.  Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. , 1991 .

[19]  Shinobu Kitayama,et al.  Implicit independence and interdependence: A cultural task analysis. , 2010 .

[20]  J. Tedeschi Impression Management Theory and Social Psychological Research , 1981 .

[21]  E. Harmon-Jones,et al.  Cognitive Dissonance Theory After 50 Years of Development , 2007 .

[22]  Eliot R. Smith,et al.  The Mind in Context , 2010 .

[23]  S. Huettel,et al.  Resolving Response, Decision, and Strategic Control: Evidence for a Functional Topography in Dorsomedial Prefrontal Cortex , 2009, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[24]  C. Steele The Psychology of Self-Affirmation: Sustaining the Integrity of the Self , 1988 .

[25]  Benedetto De Martino,et al.  How Choice Reveals and Shapes Expected Hedonic Outcome , 2009, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[26]  Shinobu Kitayama,et al.  On the cultural guises of cognitive dissonance: the case of easterners and westerners. , 2005, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[27]  Samuel M. McClure,et al.  Neural Correlates of Behavioral Preference for Culturally Familiar Drinks , 2004, Neuron.

[28]  Semir Zeki,et al.  Neural Correlates of Hate , 2008, PloS one.

[29]  Oliver J. Hulme,et al.  Modulation of aesthetic value by semantic context: An fMRI study , 2009, NeuroImage.

[30]  E. Rolls,et al.  Cognitive Modulation of Olfactory Processing , 2005, Neuron.

[31]  S. Fiske,et al.  The Handbook of Social Psychology , 1935 .

[32]  Cameron S Carter,et al.  Neural activity predicts attitude change in cognitive dissonance , 2009, Nature Neuroscience.

[33]  Thomas R. Shultz,et al.  Free Choice and Cognitive Dissonance Revisited: Choosing “Lesser Evils” Versus “Greater Goods” , 1999 .

[34]  Hideaki Kawabata,et al.  The Neural Correlates of Desire , 2008, PloS one.

[35]  C. Frith,et al.  Reading the mind in cartoons and stories: an fMRI study of ‘theory of mind’ in verbal and nonverbal tasks , 2000, Neuropsychologia.

[36]  Daniel S. Margulies,et al.  Delineating self-referential processing from episodic memory retrieval: Common and dissociable networks , 2010, NeuroImage.

[37]  A. Bailey,et al.  Are there theory of mind regions in the brain? A review of the neuroimaging literature , 2009, Human brain mapping.

[38]  C. N. Macrae,et al.  Finding the Self? An Event-Related fMRI Study , 2002, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[39]  J. Gross,et al.  Cognitive Emotion Regulation , 2008, Current directions in psychological science.

[40]  Elliot T. Berkman,et al.  The neural basis of rationalization: cognitive dissonance reduction during decision-making. , 2011, Social cognitive and affective neuroscience.

[41]  Jin Fan,et al.  Neural basis of cultural influence on self-representation , 2007, NeuroImage.

[42]  J. Brehm Postdecision changes in the desirability of alternatives. , 1956, Journal of abnormal psychology.