Conservation and Genetics

Humans are responsible for a cataclysm of species extinction that will change the world as we see it, and will adversely affect human health and wellbeing. We need to understand at individual and societal levels why species conservation is important. Accepting the premise that species have value, we need to next consider the mechanisms underlying species extinction and what we can do to reverse the process. One of the last stages of species extinction is the reduction of a species to a few populations of relatively few individuals, a scenario that leads invariably to inbreeding and its adverse consequences, inbreeding depression. Inbreeding depression can be so severe that populations become at risk of extinction not only because of the expression of harmful recessive alleles (alleles having no phenotypic effect when in the heterozygous condition, e.g., Aa, where a is the recessive allele), but also because of their inability to respond genetically with sufficient speed to adapt to changing environmental conditions. However, new conservation approaches based on foundational quantitative and population genetic theory advocate for active genetic management of fragmented populations by facilitating gene movements between populations, i.e., admixture, or genetic rescue. Why species conservation is critical, the genetic consequences of small population size that often lead to extinction, and possible solutions to the problem of small population size are discussed and presented.

[1]  A. Leopold,et al.  A Sand County Almanac and Sketches Here and There , 2020 .

[2]  V. Loeschcke,et al.  Conservation Genetics , 2019, Handbook of Statistical Genomics.

[3]  Bradford C. Lister,et al.  Climate-driven declines in arthropod abundance restructure a rainforest food web , 2018, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[4]  S. K. Lyons,et al.  Body size downgrading of mammals over the late Quaternary , 2018, Science.

[5]  Michele R. Dudash,et al.  Call for a Paradigm Shift in the Genetic Management of Fragmented Populations , 2018 .

[6]  Paul B. Leonard,et al.  The Future of Landscape Conservation , 2018, Bioscience.

[7]  Robert Costanza,et al.  Twenty years of ecosystem services: How far have we come and how far do we still need to go? , 2017 .

[8]  H. de Kroon,et al.  More than 75 percent decline over 27 years in total flying insect biomass in protected areas , 2017, PloS one.

[9]  Michele R. Dudash,et al.  A Practical Guide for Genetic Management of Fragmented Animal and Plant Populations , 2017 .

[10]  Jerald Winakur,et al.  A Silent Spring , 2017 .

[11]  Ben Collen,et al.  The Living Planet Index , 2017 .

[12]  Louise McRae,et al.  The Diversity-Weighted Living Planet Index: Controlling for Taxonomic Bias in a Global Biodiversity Indicator , 2017, PloS one.

[13]  M. P. Concas,et al.  Height-reducing variants and selection for short stature in Sardinia , 2015, Nature Genetics.

[14]  R. Frankham Genetic rescue of small inbred populations: meta-analysis reveals large and consistent benefits of gene flow. , 2015, Molecular ecology.

[15]  P. Balaresque,et al.  Y-chromosome descent clusters and male differential reproductive success: young lineage expansions dominate Asian pastoral nomadic populations , 2015, European Journal of Human Genetics.

[16]  H. D. Cooper,et al.  A mid-term analysis of progress toward international biodiversity targets , 2014, Science.

[17]  Ross M. Fraser,et al.  Defining the role of common variation in the genomic and biological architecture of adult human height , 2014, Nature Genetics.

[18]  James R. Faulkner,et al.  Simple life-history traits explain key effective population size ratios across diverse taxa , 2013, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[19]  P. Ehrlich,et al.  Can a collapse of global civilization be avoided? , 2013, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[20]  D. Fraser,et al.  Effective/census population size ratio estimation: a compendium and appraisal , 2012, Ecology and evolution.

[21]  G. Daily,et al.  Biodiversity loss and its impact on humanity , 2012, Nature.

[22]  Tari Haahtela,et al.  Environmental biodiversity, human microbiota, and allergy are interrelated , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[23]  Michele R. Dudash,et al.  Predicting the Probability of Outbreeding Depression , 2011, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[24]  J. Ragle,et al.  IUCN Red List of Threatened Species , 2010 .

[25]  S. O’Brien,et al.  Genetic Restoration of the Florida Panther , 2010, Science.

[26]  K. Weber Population Size and Long‐Term Selection , 2010 .

[27]  Gonzalo Alvarez,et al.  The Role of Inbreeding in the Extinction of a European Royal Dynasty , 2009, PloS one.

[28]  F. Palstra,et al.  Genetic estimates of contemporary effective population size: what can they tell us about the importance of genetic stochasticity for wild population persistence? , 2008, Molecular ecology.

[29]  David L. Erickson,et al.  INTRASPECIFIC HYBRIDIZATION AND THE RECOVERY OF FITNESS IN THE NATIVE LEGUME CHAMAECRISTA FASCICULATA , 2006, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[30]  D. Pimentel,et al.  Update on the environmental and economic costs associated with alien-invasive species in the United States , 2005 .

[31]  Suling Zhu,et al.  The genetic legacy of the Mongols. , 2003, American journal of human genetics.

[32]  S. Barrett Evolution of sex: The evolution of plant sexual diversity , 2002, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[33]  U. Mueller,et al.  Evidence of unconstrained directional selection for male tallness , 2001, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[34]  Michele R. Dudash,et al.  Genetics underlying inbreeding depression in Mimulus with contrasting mating systems , 1998, Nature.

[35]  R. O'Neill,et al.  The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital , 1997, Nature.

[36]  A. Pusey,et al.  Inbreeding avoidance in animals. , 1996, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[37]  R. Frankham Effective population size/adult population size ratios in wildlife: a review. , 1995, Genetical research.

[38]  Marcella M. Demauro Relationship of breeding system to rarity in the lakeside daisy (Hymenoxys acaulis var. glabra) , 1993 .

[39]  M. Kimura,et al.  The neutral theory of molecular evolution. , 1983, Scientific American.

[40]  S. Weller PLANT POPULATION BIOLOGY AT THE CROSSROADS , 1978 .

[41]  M. J. Lawrence The genetics of self-incompatibility in Papaver rhoeas , 1975, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[42]  T. Ohta Slightly Deleterious Mutant Substitutions in Evolution , 1973, Nature.

[43]  M. Kimura,et al.  An introduction to population genetics theory , 1971 .

[44]  R. Frankham,et al.  The effects of population size and selection intesnity in selection for a quantitative character in Drosophila. II. Long-term response to selection. , 1968, Genetical research.

[45]  S. Wright,et al.  The Distribution of Self-Sterility Alleles in Populations. , 1939, Genetics.

[46]  C. Darwin,et al.  On the Tendency of Species to form Varieties; and on the Perpetuation of Varieties and Species by Natural Means of Selection , 1858 .

[47]  S. Telford Deer Reduction Is a Cornerstone of Integrated Deer Tick Management , 2017 .

[48]  K. Gaston,et al.  Common European birds are declining rapidly while less abundant species' numbers are rising. , 2015, Ecology letters.

[49]  Michele R. Dudash,et al.  Genetics, Demography and Viability of Fragmented Populations: Inbreeding and outbreeding depression in fragmented populations , 2000 .

[50]  Henry C. Tuckwell,et al.  World population , 1992, Nature.

[51]  R. Frankham,et al.  The effects of population size and selection intensity in selection for a quantitative character in Drosophila. I. Short-term response to selection. , 1968, Genetical research.

[52]  S. Wright,et al.  Evolution in Mendelian Populations. , 1931, Genetics.

[53]  H. Gleason The individualistic concept of the plant association , 1926 .

[54]  G. Shull The composition of a field of maize , 1908 .