Measuring the sensitivity of total knee replacement kinematics and laxity to soft tissue imbalances.

Ligament balancing during total knee replacement (TKR) is receiving increased attention due to its influence on resulting joint kinematics and laxity. We employed a novel in vitro technique to measure the kinematics and laxity of TKR implants during gait, and measured how these characteristics are influenced by implant shape and soft tissue balancing, simulated using virtual ligaments. Compared with virtual ligaments that were equally balanced in flexion and extension, the largest changes in stance-phase tibiofemoral AP and IE kinematics occurred when the virtual ligaments were simulated to be tighter in extension (tibia offset 1.0 ± 0.1 mm posterior and 3.6 ± 0.1° externally rotated). Virtual ligaments which were tight in flexion caused the largest swing-phase changes in AP kinematics (tibia offset 2.3 ± 0.2 mm), whereas ligaments which were tight in extension caused the largest swing-phase changes in IE kinematics (4.2 ± 0.1° externally rotated). When AP and IE loads were superimposed upon normal gait loads, incremental changes in AP and IE kinematics occurred (similar to laxity testing); and these incremental changes were smallest for joints with virtual ligaments that were tight in extension (in both the stance and swing phases). Two different implant designs (symmetric versus medially congruent) exhibited different kinematics and sensitivities to superimposed loads, but demonstrated similar responses to changes in ligament balancing. Our results demonstrate the potential for pre-clinical testing of implants using joint motion simulators with virtual soft tissues to better understand how ligament balancing affects implant motion.

[1]  Lars Engebretsen,et al.  The anatomy of the medial part of the knee. , 2007, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[2]  Frederic Picard,et al.  Comparative analysis of the structural properties of the collateral ligaments of the human knee. , 2012, The Journal of orthopaedic and sports physical therapy.

[3]  Y. Ishii,et al.  Varus-valgus balance and range of movement after total knee arthroplasty. , 2005, Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery-british Volume.

[4]  James R. Robinson,et al.  Structural properties of the medial collateral ligament complex of the human knee. , 2005, Journal of biomechanics.

[5]  V. Valderrábano,et al.  Development of a force-determining tensor to measure “physiologic knee ligament gaps” without bone resection using a total knee arthroplasty approach , 2011, Journal of orthopaedic science : official journal of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association.

[6]  E S Grood,et al.  A joint coordinate system for the clinical description of three-dimensional motions: application to the knee. , 1983, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[7]  M. Roche,et al.  Increased satisfaction after total knee replacement using sensor-guided technology. , 2014, The bone & joint journal.

[8]  P. Walker,et al.  Contact forces in the tibiofemoral joint from soft tissue tensions: Implications to soft tissue balancing in total knee arthroplasty. , 2017, Journal of biomechanics.

[9]  Bradley S Davidson,et al.  Cylindrical Axis, Not Epicondyles, Approximates Perpendicular to Knee Axes , 2013, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[10]  S. Röhrl,et al.  A new method to measure ligament balancing in total knee arthroplasty: laxity measurements in 100 knees , 2012, Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery.

[11]  M. Roche,et al.  A Targeted Approach to Ligament Balancing Using Kinetic Sensors. , 2017, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[12]  J Wismans,et al.  A three-dimensional mathematical model of the knee-joint. , 1980, Journal of biomechanics.

[13]  G. Bergmann,et al.  Standardized Loads Acting in Hip Implants , 2014, PloS one.

[14]  P. Walker,et al.  Characterising knee motion and laxity in a testing machine for application to total knee evaluation. , 2015, Journal of biomechanics.

[15]  Peter S. Walker,et al.  Inherent differences in the laxity and stability between the intact knee and total knee replacements , 1997 .

[16]  H. Grootenboer,et al.  Articular contact in a three-dimensional model of the knee. , 1991, Journal of Biomechanics.

[17]  Marcus G Pandy,et al.  Grand challenge competition to predict in vivo knee loads , 2012, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[18]  Fang Liu,et al.  Morphology of the medial collateral ligament of the knee , 2010, Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research.

[19]  Kevin A. Dodd,et al.  Computational Knee Ligament Modeling Using Experimentally Determined Zero-Load Lengths , 2012, The open biomedical engineering journal.

[20]  P. Sharkey,et al.  Why Are Total Knee Arthroplasties Failing Today? , 2002 .

[21]  L Blankevoort,et al.  Ligament-bone interaction in a three-dimensional model of the knee. , 1991, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[22]  Sina Babazadeh,et al.  The relevance of ligament balancing in total knee arthroplasty: how important is it? A systematic review of the literature , 2009, Orthopedic reviews.

[23]  Michael F. Vignos,et al.  The Influence of Component Alignment and Ligament Properties on Tibiofemoral Contact Forces in Total Knee Replacement. , 2016, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[24]  G. Bergmann,et al.  ESB Clinical Biomechanics Award 2008: Complete data of total knee replacement loading for level walking and stair climbing measured in vivo with a follow-up of 6-10 months. , 2009, Clinical biomechanics.

[25]  Shahram Amiri,et al.  A Computational Modeling Approach for Investigating Soft Tissue Balancing in Bicruciate Retaining Knee Arthroplasty , 2012, Comput. Math. Methods Medicine.