Studies on blind and visually impaired users in LIS literature: A review of research methods

Abstract Current sight-centered designs and services in library and information science (LIS) do not effectively support blind and visually impaired (BVI) users. Simultaneously, there is a lack of studies focused on the research methods utilized in BVI research. This study analyzed 165 research papers retrieved from four LIS databases over a 40-year period. The uniqueness of BVI research methods on research design, data collection, and data analysis is highlighted. While survey and experiment are the two most commonly applied research designs in LIS research, survey and evaluation are the main research designs for BVI research. Concurrently, assessment report is a unique data collection method employed. More quantitative analysis was also applied in BVI research, and most of the qualitative analysis was not specified. This study reveals an opportunity to enhance the diverse approaches to BVI research and further satisfy BVI users' unique needs.

[1]  Matthew Oppenheim.  Speech and touch enhanced interface for visually impaired users , 2013 .

[2]  Iris Xie,et al.  Enhancing usability of digital libraries: Designing help features to support blind and visually impaired users , 2020, Inf. Process. Manag..

[3]  Shailendra Kumar,et al.  Web challenges faced by blind and vision impaired users in libraries of Delhi: An Indian scenario , 2015, Electron. Libr..

[4]  A. Onwuegbuzie,et al.  Toward a Definition of Mixed Methods Research , 2007 .

[5]  Konstantina Martzoukou,et al.  A review of Web information seeking research: considerations of method and foci of interest , 2005, Inf. Res..

[6]  Sonja Špiranec,et al.  Tag-resource-user: a review of approaches in studying folksonomies , 2015 .

[7]  Brian R. Johnson,et al.  A Report on a Novice User's Interaction with the Internet through a Self-Voicing Application , 2005 .

[8]  Klaus Krippendorff,et al.  Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology , 1980 .

[9]  Tony Stockman,et al.  A comparative analysis of the information-seeking behavior of visually impaired and sighted searchers , 2012, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[10]  Gerd Berget,et al.  What Is Known About the Impact of Impairments on Information Seeking and Searching? , 2020, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[11]  Paul Parboteeah,et al.  Diversity-related research reported in high-impact library and information science journal literature: A content analysis , 2017 .

[12]  Qing Ke,et al.  Research methods: What's in the name? , 2017 .

[13]  Sharon Seymour.  Online public access catalog user studies : a review of research methodologies, March 1986-November 1989 , 1991 .

[14]  Pertti Vakkari,et al.  Content Analysis of Research Articles in Library and Information Science. , 1990 .

[15]  Bryony Ramsden.  Ethnographic methods in academic libraries: A review , 2016 .

[16]  A. Strauss.  Basics Of Qualitative Research , 1992 .

[17]  Aspasia Togia,et al.  An analysis of research strategies of articles published in Library Science journals: the example of Library and Information Science Research , 2017 .

[18]  R. Fidel.  Are we there yet?: Mixed methods research in library and information science , 2008 .

[19]  R. Fidel.  Qualitative methods in information retrieval research. , 1993 .

[20]  E. Maceviciute,et al.  Performance evaluation as a tool for strategic decisions about serving visually impaired users: The case of the Lithuanian Library for the Blind , 2016 .

[21]  Rachel Menzies,et al.  Emoji Accessibility for Visually Impaired People , 2020, CHI.

[22]  Jin Zhang,et al.  A study on statistical methods used in six journals of library and information science , 2016, Online Inf. Rev..

[23]  Sylvain K. Cibangu.  A memo of qualitative research for information science: toward theory construction , 2013, J. Documentation.

[24]  Iris Xie,et al.  Identification of factors associated with blind users' help‐seeking situations in interacting with digital libraries , 2018, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[25]  Bernard J. Jansen,et al.  A review of Web searching studies and a framework for future research , 2001, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[26]  John W. Creswell,et al.  Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches , 2010 .

[27]  Iris Xie,et al.  Marginalized communities, emerging technologies, and social innovation in the digital age: Introduction to the special issue , 2020, Inf. Process. Manag..

[28]  Heidi Julien,et al.  Trends in information behavior research, 1999–2008: A content analysis , 2011 .

[29]  Iris Xie,et al.  Haze in the digital library: design issues hampering accessibility for blind users , 2017, Electron. Libr..

[30]  Pertti Vakkari,et al.  The Evolution of Library and Information Science 1965-1985: A Content Analysis of Journal Articles , 1993, Inf. Process. Manag..

[31]  Anne Goulding,et al.  Grounded theory and ethnography combined: A methodology to study children's interactions on children's mobile libraries , 2016, J. Documentation.

[32]  Cheryl Riley,et al.  Libraries, aggregator databases, screen readers and clients with disabilities , 2002 .

[33]  Scott Hollier,et al.  Website Accessibility: a Comparative Analysis of Australian National and State/Territory Library Websites , 2012 .

[34]  Bluma C. Peritz,et al.  The Methods of Library Science Research: Some Results from a Bibliometric Survey. , 1980 .

[35]  Kanwal Ameen,et al.  Account of methodologies and methods applied in LIS research: A systematic review , 2018 .

[36]  Nahid Bayat Bodaghi,et al.  Student Volunteers as Academic Saviours and Social Connectors among the Visually Impaired in an Academic Library , 2014 .

[37]  Pertti Vakkari,et al.  Evolution of library and information science, 1965–2005: Content analysis of journal articles , 2014, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[38]  O. Holsti.  Content Analysis for the Social Sciences and Humanities , 1969 .

[39]  Aaron Allen,et al.  What Frustrates Screen Reader Users on the Web: A Study of 100 Blind Users , 2007, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact..

[40]  Iris Xie,et al.  Orientation tactics and associated factors in the digital library environment: Comparison between blind and sighted users , 2021, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[41]  Heting Chu.  Research methods in library and information science: A content analysis , 2015 .

[42]  Michael Khoo,et al.  A survey of the use of ethnographic methods in the study of libraries and library users , 2012 .

[43]  S. Kumpulainen,et al.  Library and Information Science Research in 1975: Content Analysis of the Journal Articles , 1991 .

[44]  Erika E. Smith,et al.  Mixed Methods Research in Library and Information Science: A Methodological Review , 2020, Evidence Based Library and Information Practice.

[45]  Krystyna K. Matusiak.  Studying information behavior of image users: An overview of research methodology in LIS literature, 2004–2015 , 2017 .

[46]  N. B. Bodaghi,et al.  Accessibility and facilities for the disabled in public and university library buildings in Iran , 2013 .

[47]  Bridget C. O’Brien,et al.  Standards for Reporting Qualitative Research: A Synthesis of Recommendations , 2014, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.

[48]  Iris Xie,et al.  Importance of Digital Library Design Guidelines to Support Blind and Visually Impaired Users: Perceptions of Key Stakeholders , 2021, iConference.

[49]  Emeline Brulé,et al.  Review of Quantitative Empirical Evaluations of Technology for People with Visual Impairments , 2020, CHI.

[50]  Pierre Pluye,et al.  Mixed methods research in library and information science: A methodological review , 2020, Library & Information Science Research.

[51]  Barbara Leporini,et al.  Improving search engine interfaces for blind users: a case study , 2006, Universal Access in the Information Society.

[52]  Heather Hill,et al.  Disability and accessibility in the library and information science literature: A content analysis , 2013 .

[53]  Philip Hider,et al.  Empirical research methods reported in high-profile LIS journal literature , 2008 .