论文信息 - The Evolution of Interoperability

The Evolution of Interoperability

This note is a retrospective review of our 2006 paper [1] on the properties of protocols, especially interoperability. A bit of history is in order. By 2006, the importance of a social semantics for protocols was well-established in the multiagent systems community. Further, commitments had emerged as a preeminent abstraction for capturing the semantics. The big advantage was that specifying the meaning of protocol messages in terms of the commitments among agents enabled the agents to act flexibly.

Munindar P. Singh | Amit K. Chopra | A. Chopra

[1] Michael Winikoff,et al. Implementing commitment-based interactions , 2007, AAMAS '07.

[2] Munindar P. Singh,et al. Producing Compliant Interactions: Conformance, Coverage, and Interoperability , 2006, DALT.

[3] Amit K. Chopra. Social computing: Principles, platforms, and applications , 2011, 2011 First International Workshop on Requirements Engineering for Social Computing.

[4] Alan H. Bond,et al. Distributed Artificial Intelligence , 1988 .

[5] Munindar P. Singh,et al. Elements of a Business-Level Architecture for Multiagent Systems , 2009, PROMAS.

[6] Munindar P. Singh,et al. Contextualizing commitment protocol , 2006, AAMAS '06.

[7] Yang Gao,et al. Distributed Artificial Intelligence: Second International Conference, DAI 2020, Nanjing, China, October 24–27, 2020, Proceedings , 2020, DAI.

[8] Munindar P. Singh,et al. Choice, interoperability, and conformance in interaction protocols and service choreographies , 2009, AAMAS.

[9] Marco Colombetti,et al. Research directions in agent communication , 2013, TIST.

[10] Munindar P. Singh,et al. Multiagent commitment alignment , 2009, AAMAS.

[11] Carl Hewitt,et al. Open Information Systems Semantics for Distributed Artificial Intelligence , 1991, Artif. Intell..

[12] Munindar P. Singh,et al. Constitutive interoperability , 2008, AAMAS.