New understanding on phloem physiology and possible consequences for modelling long-distance carbon transport.

Most current models of assimilate carbohydrate partitioning are based on growth patterns observed under a range of experimental conditions, from which a set of empirical rules are derived to simulate partitioning. As a result, they are not good at extrapolating to other conditions; this requires a mechanistic approach, which only transport-resistance (TR) models currently provide. We examine an approach to incorporating recent progress in phloem physiology into the TR approach, which leads to a 'minimalist' Munch model of a branched system with competing sinks. In vivo whole-plant measurements have demonstrated that C-flow rates are dependent not only on the properties of the sink, but also on the properties of the whole transport system, and the detailed dynamics of this behaviour is mimicked by the proposed model. This model provides a sound theoretical framework for an unambiguous definition of sink and source strengths, with sink priority being an emergent property of the model. Further developments are proposed, some of which have already had limited application, to cope with the complexity of plants; the emphasis is on a modular approach, together with the importance of choosing the appropriate scale level for both structure and function. Whole-plant experiments with in vivo measurement of the phloem dynamics will be needed to help with this choice.

[1]  R Turgeon,et al.  The absence of phloem loading in willow leaves. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[2]  J. W. Palmer,et al.  Carbon partitioning between apple fruits: short- and long-term response to availability of photosynthate , 1997 .

[3]  M. R. Thorpe,et al.  Using the short-lived isotope 11C in mechanistic studies of photosynthate transport. , 2003, Functional plant biology : FPB.

[4]  J. Thornley,et al.  Modelling Stem Height and Diameter Growth in Plants , 1999 .

[5]  Przemyslaw Prusinkiewicz,et al.  The Algorithmic Beauty of Plants , 1990, The Virtual Laboratory.

[6]  Abraham J. Escobar-Gutiérrez,et al.  Carbon-based models of individual tree growth: A critical appraisal , 2001 .

[7]  D. Fell Understanding the Control of Metabolism , 1996 .

[8]  Karl J. Oparka,et al.  Metabolic inhibitors induce symplastic movement of solutes from the transport phloem of Arabidopsis roots , 1997 .

[9]  Alexander Lang,et al.  A Relay Mechanism for Phloem Translocation , 1979 .

[10]  Wolf B. Frommer,et al.  Phloem loading and unloading of sugars and amino acids , 2003 .

[11]  J. Thornley,et al.  A Transport-resistance Model of Forest Growth and Partitioning , 1991 .

[12]  Roderick C. Dewar,et al.  A Root-Shoot Partitioning Model Based on Carbon-Nitrogen-Water Interactions and Munch Phloem Flow , 1993 .

[13]  R. Trethewey,et al.  The control of source to sink carbon flux during tuber development in potato. , 1998, The Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology.

[14]  A. Bel,et al.  Interaction between sieve element and companion cell and the consequences for photoassimilate distribution. Two structural hardware frames with associated physiological software packages in dicotyledons , 1996 .

[15]  Alexander Lang,et al.  Xylem, Phloem and Transpiration Flows in Developing Apple Fruits , 1990 .

[16]  L. T. Evans,et al.  PHOTOSYNTHESIS, CARBON PARTITIONING, AND YIELD , 1981 .

[17]  N. L. Crapo,et al.  METABOLIC PRIORITIES WITH RESPECT TO GROWTH AND MINERAL UPTAKE IN ROOTS OF HORDEUM, TRITICUM AND LYCOPERSICON , 1981 .

[18]  André Lacointe,et al.  Carbon allocation among tree organs: A review of basic processes and representation in functional-structural tree models , 2000 .

[19]  Nick Gould,et al.  Direct measurements of sieve element hydrostatic pressure reveal strong regulation after pathway blockage. , 2004, Functional Plant Biology.

[20]  Michael A. Grusak,et al.  Cold-Inhibited Phloem Translocation in Sugar Beet: II. CHARACTERIZATION AND LOCALIZATION OF THE SLOW-COOLING RESPONSE , 1985 .

[21]  M. R. Thorpe,et al.  Leaf Export and Partitioning Changes Induced by Short-Term Inhibition of Phloem Transport , 1993 .

[22]  Robert Turgeon,et al.  Symplastic Continuity between Companion Cells and the Translocation Stream: Long-Distance Transport Is Controlled by Retention and Retrieval Mechanisms in the Phloem1 , 2003, Plant Physiology.

[23]  M. R. Thorpe,et al.  What determines carbon partitioning between competing sinks? , 1996, Journal of experimental botany.

[24]  J P Wright,et al.  Direct measurement of sieve tube turgor pressure using severed aphid stylets. , 1980, Plant physiology.

[25]  K. Oparka,et al.  THE GREAT ESCAPE: Phloem Transport and Unloading of Macromolecules1. , 2000, Annual review of plant physiology and plant molecular biology.

[26]  Philip J. White,et al.  Solute is imported to elongating root cells of barley as a pressure driven-flow of solution. , 2004, Functional plant biology : FPB.

[27]  F. Houllier,et al.  A transport model for tree ring width. , 1997 .

[28]  J. Thornley,et al.  Modelling Shoot:Root Relations: the Only Way Forward? , 1998 .

[29]  N. Holbrook,et al.  Application of a single-solute non-steady-state phloem model to the study of long-distance assimilate transport. , 2003, Journal of theoretical biology.

[30]  Steven A. Hill,et al.  Source metabolism dominates the control of source to sink carbon flux in tuberizing potato plants throughout the diurnal cycle and under a range of environmental conditions. , 2000 .

[31]  F. I. Woodward,et al.  Calculation of Translocation Coefficients from Phloem Anatomy for use in Crop Models , 1995 .

[32]  Theodore M. DeJong,et al.  Quantifying sink and source limitations on dry matter partitioning to fruit growth in peach trees , 1995 .

[33]  Risto Sievänen,et al.  Modelling of reserve carbohydrate dynamics, regrowth and nodulation in a N2-fixing tree managed by periodic prunings , 2000 .

[34]  Przemyslaw Prusinkiewicz,et al.  Using L-systems for modeling the architecture and physiology of growing trees: The L-PEACH model , 2004 .

[35]  Robert Muetzelfeldt,et al.  Hierarchical approach to forest ecosystem simulation , 1996 .

[36]  Loïc Pagès,et al.  MassFlowDyn I: A Carbon Transport and Partitioning Model for Root System Architecture , 2000 .

[37]  J. Thornley A Balanced Quantitative Model for Root: Shoot Ratios in Vegetative Plants , 1972 .

[38]  P. Minchin,et al.  Carbon Partitioning in Split Root Systems of Barley: Relation to Metabolism , 1991 .

[39]  C. Wright,et al.  2 – INTERACTIONS BETWEEN VEGETATIVE AND REPRODUCTIVE GROWTH , 1989 .

[40]  C. Raper,et al.  A dynamic model for plant growth: validation study under changing temperatures. , 1984, Annals of botany.

[41]  Edward B. Rastetter,et al.  A general biogeochemical model describing the responses of the C and N cycles in terrestrial ecosystems to changes in CO(2), climate, and N deposition. , 1991, Tree physiology.

[42]  A. Bel,et al.  The phloem, a miracle of ingenuity , 2003 .

[43]  Peter C. Young,et al.  Data-based mechanistic modelling, generalised sensitivity and dominant mode analysis , 1999 .

[44]  Ep Heuvelink,et al.  Modelling biomass production and yield of horticultural crops: a review , 1998 .

[45]  Alexander Lang,et al.  Dynamics of Cold Induced Inhibition of Phloem Transport , 1983 .

[46]  P A Quant Experimental application of top-down control analysis to metabolic systems. , 1993, Trends in biochemical sciences.

[47]  E. Heuvelink,et al.  Re-interpretation of an Experiment on the Role of Assimilated Transport Resistance in Partitioning in Tomato , 1996 .

[48]  A Lacointe,et al.  Generalized Münch coupling between sugar and water fluxes for modelling carbon allocation as affected by water status. , 2002, Journal of Theoretical Biology.

[49]  Davey L. Jones,et al.  The control of carbon acquisition by roots , 2000 .

[50]  H. Kacser,et al.  The control of flux. , 1995, Biochemical Society transactions.

[51]  I. F. Wardlaw,et al.  Tansley Review No. 27 The control of carbon partitioning in plants. , 1990, The New phytologist.

[52]  P. Bancal,et al.  Source-sink partitioning. Do we need Münch? , 2002, Journal of Experimental Botany.

[53]  M. R. Thorpe,et al.  A Simple Mechanistic Model of Phloem Transport which Explains Sink Priority , 1993 .

[54]  Axel Haase,et al.  Simultaneous measurement of water flow velocity and solute transport in xylem and phloem of adult plants of Ricinus communis over a daily time course by nuclear magnetic resonance spectrometry , 2001 .

[55]  M. R. Thorpe,et al.  Measurement of Unloading and Reloading of Photo-assimilate within the Stem of Bean , 1987 .

[56]  Harri Hakula,et al.  Modelling tree growth as a competition between sinks using reaction-transport approach in branched architecture , 2004 .

[57]  Y. L. Grossman,et al.  PEACH: A simulation model of reproductive and vegetative growth in peach trees. , 1994, Tree physiology.

[58]  Theodore M. DeJong,et al.  Developmental and Environmental Control of Dry-matter Partitioning in Peach , 1997 .