Incorporating environmental attitudes in discrete choice models: an exploration of the utility of the awareness of consequences scale.

Environmental economists are increasingly interested in better understanding how people cognitively organise their beliefs and attitudes towards environmental change in order to identify key motives and barriers that stimulate or prevent action. In this paper, we explore the utility of a commonly used psychometric scale, the awareness of consequences (AC) scale, in order to better understand stated choices. The main contribution of the paper is that it provides a novel approach to incorporate attitudinal information into discrete choice models for environmental valuation: firstly, environmental attitudes are incorporated using a reinterpretation of the classical AC scale recently proposed by Ryan and Spash (2012); and, secondly, attitudinal data is incorporated as latent variables under a hybrid choice modelling framework. This novel approach is applied to data from a survey conducted in the Basque Country (Spain) in 2008 aimed at valuing land-use policies in a Natura 2000 Network site. The results are relevant to policy-making because choice models that are able to accommodate underlying environmental attitudes may help in designing more effective environmental policies.

[1]  Jeremy Shires,et al.  Accommodating Underlying Pro-environmental Attitudes in a Rail Travel Context: Application of a Latent Variable Latent Class Specification , 2013 .

[2]  Maya Abou Zeid,et al.  Attitudes and Value of Time Heterogeneity , 2010 .

[3]  Tommy Gärling,et al.  The relationships between awareness of consequences, environmental concern, and value orientations , 2008 .

[4]  C. Spash Non-Economic Motivation for Contingent Values: Rights and Attitudinal Beliefs in the Willingness To Pay for Environmental Improvements , 2006, Land Economics.

[5]  P. Schultz New Environmental Theories: Empathizing With Nature: The Effects ofPerspective Taking on Concern for Environmental Issues , 2000 .

[6]  P. Stern New Environmental Theories: Toward a Coherent Theory of Environmentally Significant Behavior , 2000 .

[7]  D. McFadden Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior , 1972 .

[8]  Joan L. Walker,et al.  Extended Framework for Modeling Choice Behavior , 1999 .

[9]  Petr Mariel,et al.  The influence of cultural identity on the WTP to protect natural resources: some empirical evidence. , 2009 .

[10]  Turalay Kenc,et al.  Ox: An Object-Oriented Matrix Language , 1997 .

[11]  P. Boxall,et al.  Understanding Heterogeneous Preferences in Random Utility Models: A Latent Class Approach , 2002 .

[12]  G. Wong,et al.  Applied Environmental Economics: A GIS Approach to Cost-Benefit Analysis , 2006 .

[13]  Joan L. Walker,et al.  Hybrid Choice Models: Progress and Challenges , 2002 .

[14]  Eija Pouta,et al.  Attitude and belief questions as a source of context effect in a contingent valuation survey , 2004 .

[15]  Florian Heiss,et al.  Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation , 2016 .

[16]  Unai Pascual,et al.  Valuing a Natura 2000 network site to inform land use options using a discrete choice experiment: An illustration from the Basque Country , 2012 .

[17]  Wesley P. Schultz,et al.  Empathizing With Nature: The Effects of Perspective Taking on Concern for Environmental Issues , 2000 .

[18]  Rosemary Snelgar,et al.  Egoistic, altruistic, and biospheric environmental concerns: Measurement and structure , 2006 .

[19]  N. Hanley,et al.  Preferences, information and biodiversity preservation , 1995 .

[20]  H. Simon,et al.  Rationality as Process and as Product of Thought , 1978 .

[21]  John A. Glaser,et al.  Environmental values , 2008 .

[22]  Todd A. Mooradian,et al.  Sex, Personality, and Sustainable Consumer Behaviour: Elucidating the Gender Effect , 2012 .

[23]  William S. Breffle,et al.  A Joint Latent-Class Model: Combining Likert-Scale Preference Statements With Choice Data to Harvest Preference Heterogeneity , 2011 .

[24]  Joffre Swait,et al.  ADVANCED CHOICE MODELS , 2006 .

[25]  C. Spash,et al.  The Awareness of Consequences Scale: An Exploration, Empirical Analysis, and Reinterpretation , 2012 .

[26]  Maria L. Loureiro,et al.  Altruistic, egoistic and biospheric values in willingness to pay (WTP) for wildlife , 2007 .

[27]  Clive L. Spash,et al.  Ecosystems, contingent valuation and ethics: the case of wetland re-creation , 2000 .

[28]  A. Longo,et al.  Willingness to Pay for Ancillary Benefits of Climate Change Mitigation , 2012 .

[29]  R. Barberán,et al.  Economic valuation of domestic water uses. , 2014, The Science of the total environment.

[30]  J. Swait A structural equation model of latent segmentation and product choice for cross-sectional revealed preference choice data☆ , 1994 .

[31]  J. Walter Milon,et al.  Latent preferences and valuation of wetland ecosystem restoration , 2006 .

[32]  Geoffrey J. McLachlan,et al.  Finite Mixture Models , 2019, Annual Review of Statistics and Its Application.

[33]  A. Daly,et al.  Using ordered attitudinal indicators in a latent variable choice model: a study of the impact of security on rail travel behaviour , 2012 .

[34]  Ö. Can,et al.  Valuation of environmental improvements in a specially protected marine area: a choice experiment approach in Göcek Bay, Turkey. , 2012, The Science of the total environment.

[35]  C. Winston,et al.  Differentiated Road Pricing, Express Lanes and Carpools: Exploiting Heterogeneous Preferences in Policy Design , 2006 .

[36]  David A. Hensher,et al.  A latent class model for discrete choice analysis: contrasts with mixed logit , 2003 .

[37]  C. Winston,et al.  UNCOVERING THE DISTRIBUTION OF MOTORISTS' PREFERENCES FOR TRAVEL TIME AND RELIABILITY : IMPLICATIONS FOR ROAD PRICING , 2002 .

[38]  M. Thiene,et al.  Using Flexible Taste Distributions to Value Collective Reputation for Environmentally Friendly Production Methods , 2008 .

[39]  Kalidas Ashok,et al.  Extending Discrete Choice Models to Incorporate Attitudinal and Other Latent Variables , 2002 .

[40]  Shalom H. Schwartz,et al.  Normative explanations of helping behavior: A critique, proposal, and empirical test , 1973 .

[41]  I. Ajzen,et al.  Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research , 1977 .

[42]  I H Langford,et al.  Determinants of Individuals' Willingness to Pay for Perceived Reductions in Environmental Health Risks: A Case Study of Bathing Water Quality , 1998 .

[43]  David Hoyos,et al.  The state of the art of environmental valuation with discrete choice experiments , 2010 .

[44]  R. Scarpa,et al.  Organic food choices and Protection Motivation Theory: addressing the psychological sources of heterogeneity , 2011 .

[45]  Moshe Ben-Akiva,et al.  Advantages of latent class models over continuous mixture models in capturing heterogeneity , 2008 .

[46]  Shelly Chaiken,et al.  Attitude Research in the 21st Century: The Current State of Knowledge. , 2005 .

[47]  Stephane Hess,et al.  Accounting for Latent Attitudes in Willingness-to-Pay Studies: The Case of Coastal Water Quality Improvements in Tobago , 2012 .

[48]  R. Dunlap,et al.  THE NEW ENVIRONMENTAL PARADIGM: 5 PROPOSED MEASURING INSTRUMENT AND PRELIMINARY RESULTS , 1978 .

[49]  Michel Bierlaire,et al.  Adjectives qualifying individuals perceptions impacting on transport mode preferences , 2011 .

[50]  Jennifer J. Tabanico,et al.  Implicit connections with nature , 2004 .

[51]  P. Stern,et al.  Value Orientations, Gender, and Environmental Concern , 1993 .

[52]  P. Stern,et al.  The New Ecological Paradigm in Social-Psychological Context , 1995 .

[53]  R. Dunlap,et al.  Measuring Endorsement of the New Ecological Paradigm: A Revised NEP Scale , 2000 .

[54]  Michel Bierlaire,et al.  BIOGEME: a free package for the estimation of discrete choice models , 2003 .

[55]  S. Chaiken,et al.  The psychology of attitudes. , 1993 .

[56]  Moshe Ben-Akiva,et al.  Hybrid Choice Models with Logit Kernel: Applicability to Large Scale Models1 , 2005 .

[57]  D. Hensher,et al.  Stated Choice Methods: Analysis and Applications , 2000 .

[58]  Riccardo Scarpa,et al.  Effects on Welfare Measures of Alternative Means of Accounting for Preference Heterogeneity in Recreational Demand Models , 2008 .

[59]  D. Dupont,et al.  Do children matter? An examination of gender differences in environmental valuation , 2004 .