Incorporating environmental attitudes in discrete choice models: an exploration of the utility of the awareness of consequences scale.
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] Jeremy Shires,et al. Accommodating Underlying Pro-environmental Attitudes in a Rail Travel Context: Application of a Latent Variable Latent Class Specification , 2013 .
[2] Maya Abou Zeid,et al. Attitudes and Value of Time Heterogeneity , 2010 .
[3] Tommy Gärling,et al. The relationships between awareness of consequences, environmental concern, and value orientations , 2008 .
[4] C. Spash. Non-Economic Motivation for Contingent Values: Rights and Attitudinal Beliefs in the Willingness To Pay for Environmental Improvements , 2006, Land Economics.
[5] P. Schultz. New Environmental Theories: Empathizing With Nature: The Effects ofPerspective Taking on Concern for Environmental Issues , 2000 .
[6] P. Stern. New Environmental Theories: Toward a Coherent Theory of Environmentally Significant Behavior , 2000 .
[7] D. McFadden. Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior , 1972 .
[8] Joan L. Walker,et al. Extended Framework for Modeling Choice Behavior , 1999 .
[9] Petr Mariel,et al. The influence of cultural identity on the WTP to protect natural resources: some empirical evidence. , 2009 .
[10] Turalay Kenc,et al. Ox: An Object-Oriented Matrix Language , 1997 .
[11] P. Boxall,et al. Understanding Heterogeneous Preferences in Random Utility Models: A Latent Class Approach , 2002 .
[12] G. Wong,et al. Applied Environmental Economics: A GIS Approach to Cost-Benefit Analysis , 2006 .
[13] Joan L. Walker,et al. Hybrid Choice Models: Progress and Challenges , 2002 .
[14] Eija Pouta,et al. Attitude and belief questions as a source of context effect in a contingent valuation survey , 2004 .
[15] Florian Heiss,et al. Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation , 2016 .
[16] Unai Pascual,et al. Valuing a Natura 2000 network site to inform land use options using a discrete choice experiment: An illustration from the Basque Country , 2012 .
[17] Wesley P. Schultz,et al. Empathizing With Nature: The Effects of Perspective Taking on Concern for Environmental Issues , 2000 .
[18] Rosemary Snelgar,et al. Egoistic, altruistic, and biospheric environmental concerns: Measurement and structure , 2006 .
[19] N. Hanley,et al. Preferences, information and biodiversity preservation , 1995 .
[20] H. Simon,et al. Rationality as Process and as Product of Thought , 1978 .
[21] John A. Glaser,et al. Environmental values , 2008 .
[22] Todd A. Mooradian,et al. Sex, Personality, and Sustainable Consumer Behaviour: Elucidating the Gender Effect , 2012 .
[23] William S. Breffle,et al. A Joint Latent-Class Model: Combining Likert-Scale Preference Statements With Choice Data to Harvest Preference Heterogeneity , 2011 .
[24] Joffre Swait,et al. ADVANCED CHOICE MODELS , 2006 .
[25] C. Spash,et al. The Awareness of Consequences Scale: An Exploration, Empirical Analysis, and Reinterpretation , 2012 .
[26] Maria L. Loureiro,et al. Altruistic, egoistic and biospheric values in willingness to pay (WTP) for wildlife , 2007 .
[27] Clive L. Spash,et al. Ecosystems, contingent valuation and ethics: the case of wetland re-creation , 2000 .
[28] A. Longo,et al. Willingness to Pay for Ancillary Benefits of Climate Change Mitigation , 2012 .
[29] R. Barberán,et al. Economic valuation of domestic water uses. , 2014, The Science of the total environment.
[30] J. Swait. A structural equation model of latent segmentation and product choice for cross-sectional revealed preference choice data☆ , 1994 .
[31] J. Walter Milon,et al. Latent preferences and valuation of wetland ecosystem restoration , 2006 .
[32] Geoffrey J. McLachlan,et al. Finite Mixture Models , 2019, Annual Review of Statistics and Its Application.
[33] A. Daly,et al. Using ordered attitudinal indicators in a latent variable choice model: a study of the impact of security on rail travel behaviour , 2012 .
[34] Ö. Can,et al. Valuation of environmental improvements in a specially protected marine area: a choice experiment approach in Göcek Bay, Turkey. , 2012, The Science of the total environment.
[35] C. Winston,et al. Differentiated Road Pricing, Express Lanes and Carpools: Exploiting Heterogeneous Preferences in Policy Design , 2006 .
[36] David A. Hensher,et al. A latent class model for discrete choice analysis: contrasts with mixed logit , 2003 .
[37] C. Winston,et al. UNCOVERING THE DISTRIBUTION OF MOTORISTS' PREFERENCES FOR TRAVEL TIME AND RELIABILITY : IMPLICATIONS FOR ROAD PRICING , 2002 .
[38] M. Thiene,et al. Using Flexible Taste Distributions to Value Collective Reputation for Environmentally Friendly Production Methods , 2008 .
[39] Kalidas Ashok,et al. Extending Discrete Choice Models to Incorporate Attitudinal and Other Latent Variables , 2002 .
[40] Shalom H. Schwartz,et al. Normative explanations of helping behavior: A critique, proposal, and empirical test , 1973 .
[41] I. Ajzen,et al. Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research , 1977 .
[42] I H Langford,et al. Determinants of Individuals' Willingness to Pay for Perceived Reductions in Environmental Health Risks: A Case Study of Bathing Water Quality , 1998 .
[43] David Hoyos,et al. The state of the art of environmental valuation with discrete choice experiments , 2010 .
[44] R. Scarpa,et al. Organic food choices and Protection Motivation Theory: addressing the psychological sources of heterogeneity , 2011 .
[45] Moshe Ben-Akiva,et al. Advantages of latent class models over continuous mixture models in capturing heterogeneity , 2008 .
[46] Shelly Chaiken,et al. Attitude Research in the 21st Century: The Current State of Knowledge. , 2005 .
[47] Stephane Hess,et al. Accounting for Latent Attitudes in Willingness-to-Pay Studies: The Case of Coastal Water Quality Improvements in Tobago , 2012 .
[48] R. Dunlap,et al. THE NEW ENVIRONMENTAL PARADIGM: 5 PROPOSED MEASURING INSTRUMENT AND PRELIMINARY RESULTS , 1978 .
[49] Michel Bierlaire,et al. Adjectives qualifying individuals perceptions impacting on transport mode preferences , 2011 .
[50] Jennifer J. Tabanico,et al. Implicit connections with nature , 2004 .
[51] P. Stern,et al. Value Orientations, Gender, and Environmental Concern , 1993 .
[52] P. Stern,et al. The New Ecological Paradigm in Social-Psychological Context , 1995 .
[53] R. Dunlap,et al. Measuring Endorsement of the New Ecological Paradigm: A Revised NEP Scale , 2000 .
[54] Michel Bierlaire,et al. BIOGEME: a free package for the estimation of discrete choice models , 2003 .
[55] S. Chaiken,et al. The psychology of attitudes. , 1993 .
[56] Moshe Ben-Akiva,et al. Hybrid Choice Models with Logit Kernel: Applicability to Large Scale Models1 , 2005 .
[57] D. Hensher,et al. Stated Choice Methods: Analysis and Applications , 2000 .
[58] Riccardo Scarpa,et al. Effects on Welfare Measures of Alternative Means of Accounting for Preference Heterogeneity in Recreational Demand Models , 2008 .
[59] D. Dupont,et al. Do children matter? An examination of gender differences in environmental valuation , 2004 .