Spatial Analysis of Navigation in Virtual Geographic Environments

Human performance and navigation activity in virtual environments can be measured and assessed with the aim to draw specific conclusions about human cognition. This paper presents an original virtual geographic environment (VGE) designed and used for this purpose. The presented research is rooted in an interdisciplinary approach combining knowledge and principles from the fields of psychology, cartography, and information technologies. The VGE was embedded with user logging functionality to provide a basis from which conclusions about human cognitive processes in a VGE could be drawn. The scope of this solution is introduced, described, and discussed under a behavioral measurement framework. An exploratory research design was adopted to demonstrate the environment’s utility in proof-of-concept user testing. Twenty participants were observed in interactive, semi-interactive and non-interactive tasks, their performance and individual differences were analyzed. The behavioral measurements were supplemented by Object-Spatial Imagery and a Verbal Questionnaire to determine the participants’ cognitive styles. In this sample, significant differences in exploration strategies between men and women were detected. Differences between experienced and non-experienced users were also found in their ability to identify spatial relations in virtual scenes. Finally, areas for future research areas and development were pinpointed.

[1]  Stanislav Popelka,et al.  Extinct Village 3D visualization and its Evaluation with Eye-Movement Recording , 2014, ICCSA.

[2]  Sara Irina Fabrikant,et al.  How users interact with a 3D geo-browser under time pressure , 2013 .

[3]  Russell A. Epstein,et al.  The cognitive map in humans: spatial navigation and beyond , 2017, Nature Neuroscience.

[4]  Thomas S. Collett,et al.  The selection and use of landmarks by insects , 1997 .

[5]  Hanspeter A. Mallot,et al.  Biomimetic robot navigation , 2000, Robotics Auton. Syst..

[6]  Arzu Çöltekin,et al.  THE EFFECT OF REALISM ON THE CONFIDENCE IN SPATIAL DATA QUALITY IN STEREOSCOPIC 3D DISPLAYS , 2009 .

[7]  S. Fabrikant,et al.  Virtual environments as memory training devices in navigational tasks for older adults , 2018, Scientific Reports.

[8]  Sara Sara Irina Jean-Paul Christophe Maggi,et al.  How Do Display Design and User Characteristics Matter in Animations?: An Empirical Study with Air Traffic Control Displays , 2015, Cartogr. Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Geovisualization.

[9]  Michal Šimeček,et al.  Visual space perception at different levels of depth description , 2015, Attention, perception & psychophysics.

[10]  A. Furnham,et al.  Cognitive Style and Creativity , 2011 .

[11]  David J. Foster,et al.  Memory and Space: Towards an Understanding of the Cognitive Map , 2015, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[12]  Min Chen,et al.  Virtual geographic environments in socio-environmental modeling: a fancy distraction or a key to communication? , 2018, Int. J. Digit. Earth.

[13]  Tobias Meilinger,et al.  Strategies of Orientation in Environmental Spaces , 2008 .

[14]  Francisco Rebelo,et al.  The influence of environmental features on route selection in an emergency situation. , 2013, Applied ergonomics.

[15]  Lukáš Herman,et al.  Controlling 3D Geovisualizations on Touch Screen – The Role of Users Age and Gestures Intuitiveness , 2018 .

[16]  Maya Hickmann,et al.  Landmark and route knowledge in children’s spatial representation of a virtual environment , 2015, Front. Psychol..

[17]  Lukáš Herman,et al.  The Role of Hue and Realism in Virtual Reality , 2018 .

[18]  Allan Paivio,et al.  Short-term sequential memory for pictures and words , 1971 .

[19]  Mel Slater,et al.  Presence in immersive virtual environments , 1993, Proceedings of IEEE Virtual Reality Annual International Symposium.

[20]  Lukáš Herman,et al.  TOUCH INTERACTION WITH 3D GEOGRAPHICAL VISUALIZATION ON WEB: SELECTED TECHNOLOGICAL AND USER ISSUES , 2016 .

[21]  Lukáš Herman,et al.  COGNITIVE ASPECTS OF COLLABORATION IN 3D VIRTUAL ENVIRONMENTS , 2016 .

[22]  William E. Cartwright,et al.  Evaluating the Effectiveness of Non-Realistic 3D Maps for Navigation with Mobile Devices , 2008, Map-based Mobile Services.

[23]  Manfred F. Buchroithner,et al.  True-3D in Cartography—Current Hard- and Softcopy Developments , 2013 .

[24]  Reginald G. Golledge,et al.  Path Selection and Route Preference in Human Navigation: A Progress Report , 1995, COSIT.

[25]  Ian J. Deary,et al.  A new measure of Verbal–Imagery Cognitive Style: VICS , 2005 .

[26]  Lukáš Herman,et al.  Comparison of User Performance with Interactive and Static 3d Visualization - Pilot Study , 2016 .

[27]  Mehdi Seyedmahmoudian,et al.  Investigating the Role of Virtual Reality in Planning for Sustainable Smart Cities , 2017 .

[28]  Lars Kulik,et al.  "Simplest" Paths: Automated Route Selection for Navigation , 2003, COSIT.

[29]  Lukáš Herman,et al.  The Design and Testing of 3DmoveR: an Experimental Tool for Usability Studies of Interactive 3D Maps , 2018 .

[30]  Kirit B. Vyas,et al.  Psychological Testing: History, Principles and Applications , 2012 .

[31]  J. Gibson The Senses Considered As Perceptual Systems , 1967 .

[32]  Hui Lin,et al.  Exploring Virtual Geographic Environments , 2001, Ann. GIS.

[33]  Maud Marchal,et al.  Kinematic Evaluation of Virtual Walking Trajectories , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.

[34]  Sabarish V. Babu,et al.  Comparison of path visualizations and cognitive measures relative to travel technique in a virtual environment , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.

[35]  Lynna J. Ausburn,et al.  Cognitive styles: Some information and implications for instructional design , 1978 .

[36]  Kevin Lynch,et al.  The Image of the City , 1960 .

[37]  Sanghee Yeo Handbook of individual differences, learning, and instruction. , 2010, Korean journal of medical education.

[38]  Robert E. Roth,et al.  Cartographic Interaction Primitives: Framework and Synthesis , 2012 .

[39]  M. Hegarty,et al.  A dissociation between object manipulation spatial ability and spatial orientation ability , 2001, Memory & cognition.

[40]  Milan Konečný CARTOGRAPHY: Challenges and Potentials in Virtual GeographicEnvironments Era , 2011 .

[41]  Jerry Shannon,et al.  Using Eye-tracking and Mouse Metrics to Test Usability of Web Mapping Navigation , 2012 .

[42]  Reginald G. Golledge,et al.  HUMAN WAYFINDING AND COGNITIVE MAPS , 2003 .

[43]  Alistair G. Sutcliffe,et al.  Evaluating the usability of virtual reality user interfaces , 2000, Behav. Inf. Technol..

[44]  Michael Batty,et al.  Virtual Environments Begin to Embrace Process‐based Geographic Analysis , 2015, Trans. GIS.

[45]  Günter Enderle,et al.  The Evolution of Computer Graphics , 1984 .

[46]  Jennifer M. Shephard,et al.  Spatial versus object visualizers: A new characterization of visual cognitive style , 2005, Memory & cognition.

[47]  Philippe Cerfontaine,et al.  How virtual reality can help visualise and assess geohazards , 2019, Int. J. Digit. Earth.

[48]  Luca Chittaro,et al.  A visual tool for tracing users' behavior in Virtual Environments , 2004, AVI.

[49]  Michael A. Motes,et al.  Object-Spatial Imagery: A New Self-Report Imagery Questionnaire , 2006 .

[50]  Manlai You,et al.  A Usability Evaluation of Web Map Zoom and Pan Functions , 2022 .

[51]  S. Fabrikant,et al.  Cross-cultural differences in figure–ground perception of cartographic stimuli , 2019 .

[52]  Lukáš Herman,et al.  When the display matters: A multifaceted perspective on 3D geovisualizations , 2017 .

[53]  Margaret Horne,et al.  Virtual reality urban modelling - an overview , 2006 .

[54]  Mordechai Haklay,et al.  Footprints in the sky: using student track logs from a “bird's eye view” virtual field trip to enhance learning , 2015 .

[55]  Lukáš Herman,et al.  Human-computer Interaction in Real 3D and Pseudo-3D Cartographic Visualization: A Comparative Study , 2015 .

[56]  Ivan Poupyrev,et al.  3D User Interfaces: Theory and Practice , 2004 .

[57]  Hanspeter A. Mallot,et al.  Use and interaction of navigation strategies in regionalized environments , 2004 .

[58]  Hui Lin,et al.  Framework for Virtual Cognitive Experiment in Virtual Geographic Environments , 2018, ISPRS Int. J. Geo Inf..

[59]  Sisi Zlatanova,et al.  Benefit of the integration of semantic 3D models in a fire-fighting VR simulator , 2012 .

[60]  Georg Gartner,et al.  Progress in Location-Based Services 2016 , 2017, LBS.

[61]  Milan Konecný,et al.  Review: Cartography: challenges and potential in the virtual geographic environments era , 2011, Ann. GIS.

[62]  MaryCarol R. Hunter,et al.  Environmental affordances: A practical approach for design of nearby outdoor settings in urban residential areas , 2015 .

[63]  Maria Kozhevnikov,et al.  The new object‐spatial‐verbal cognitive style model: Theory and measurement , 2009 .

[64]  Tomás Urbánek,et al.  Identification of altitude profiles in 3D geovisualizations: the role of interaction and spatial abilities , 2019, Int. J. Digit. Earth.

[65]  Ardeshir Mahdavi,et al.  HUMAN INTERFACE DEVICES AND BUILDING INFORMATION SYSTEMS – A USABILITY STUDY , 2013 .

[66]  Hui Lin,et al.  Virtual Geographic Environments (VGEs): A New Generation of Geographic Analysis Tool , 2013 .