Nonlinear Behavior of Planar Compliant Tensegrity Mechanism with Variable Free-Lengths

Traditional tensegrity mechanisms comprise compressive (rigid rods) and tensile members (cables). Compliant tensegrity mechanisms (CoTM) include springs alongside cables. Introduction of spring elements allows these structures to be more adaptable and robust. The kinematic and stability analyses of such mechanisms will facilitate better understanding of their behaviors for developing control and design methodologies. The analysis of CoTM often involves making the zero free-length (ZFL) assumption, i.e., the free-length of the spring is zero, which disqualifies the analysis for most real-word applications. The paper illustrates the drastic increase in computational complexity for finding static solutions as the assumption of ZFL for spring elements are relaxed for a simple planar compliant tensegrity mechanism comprising two rigid triangular platforms connected by a compressive member and two spring elements. The resulting nonlinear behavior of obtained static solutions shows intersecting manifolds of equilibrium orientation angles where the number of solutions vary from minimum of 4 to beyond 10 as the spring free-lengths are varied.

[1]  Shinichi Hirai,et al.  Crawling by body deformation of tensegrity structure robots , 2009, 2009 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[2]  Robert Connelly,et al.  Second-Order Rigidity and Prestress Stability for Tensegrity Frameworks , 1996, SIAM J. Discret. Math..

[3]  D. Ingber The architecture of life. , 1998, Scientific American.

[4]  Robert E. Skelton,et al.  Tendon control deployment of tensegrity structures , 1998, Smart Structures.

[5]  S. Levin THE TENSEGRITY-TRUSS AS A MODEL FOR SPINE MECHANICS: BIOTENSEGRITY , 2002 .

[6]  M. Corless,et al.  The prestressability problem of tensegrity structures: some analytical solutions , 2001 .

[7]  Giuseppe Radaelli,et al.  Design and optimization of a general planar zero free length spring , 2017 .

[8]  D. Ingber,et al.  Self-assembly of 3D prestressed tensegrity structures from DNA , 2010, Nature nanotechnology.

[9]  S. Pellegrino Analysis of prestressed mechanisms , 1990 .

[10]  J. Sylvester,et al.  XVIII. On a theory of the syzygetic relations of two rational integral functions, comprising an application to the theory of Sturm’s functions, and that of the greatest algebraical common measure , 1853, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London.

[11]  G. K. Ananthasuresh,et al.  Perfect Static Balance of Linkages by Addition of Springs But Not Auxiliary Bodies , 2012 .

[12]  Atil Iscen,et al.  Flop and roll: Learning robust goal-directed locomotion for a Tensegrity Robot , 2014, 2014 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[13]  Ian F. C. Smith,et al.  Mid-span connection of a deployable tensegrity footbridge , 2015 .

[14]  H. Murakami Static and dynamic analyses of tensegrity structures. Part 1. Nonlinear equations of motion , 2001 .

[15]  Rafael E. Vásquez,et al.  Analysis of a Planar Tensegrity Mechanism for Ocean Wave Energy Harvesting , 2014 .

[16]  Anthony Pugh,et al.  An Introduction to Tensegrity , 1976 .

[17]  Sergi Hernandez Juan,et al.  Tensegrity frameworks: Static analysis review. , 2008 .

[18]  Gunnar Tibert,et al.  Deployable Tensegrity Structures for Space Applications , 2002 .

[19]  Jingyao Zhang,et al.  Stability conditions for tensegrity structures , 2007 .

[20]  Clément Gosselin,et al.  Kinematic, static and dynamic analysis of a planar 2-DOF tensegrity mechanism , 2006 .