Themes and methods of research presented at European General Practice Research Network conferences.

BACKGROUND The World Organization of Family Doctors (Wonca) defined core characteristics of general practice and general practitioners' competencies. It is unclear to which extent research has addressed these issues so far. OBJECTIVE To determine themes and research methods of general practice research as reflected by presentations at the European General Practice Research Network (EGPRN) meetings. METHODS Descriptive and retrospective study. All abstracts presented at each of the 14 EGPRN conferences between June 2001 and October 2007 were analysed for content and study design/methodology. Categories for content were developed inductively; a predefined hierarchical scheme was used for study designs. RESULTS A total of N=614 abstracts were classified. The main research topics were related to GP/health service issues (n=232), clinical (n=148) and patient-related themes (n=118). Original data (n=558) were mainly derived from cross-sectional designs (38.7%). Intervention studies (11.0%), longitudinal designs including case-control and cohort studies (13.3%) as well as instrumental research (2.2%) were less common. More than one-fourth of all original studies were qualitative studies (27.6%). Stratified analysis revealed that cross-sectional designs were less frequent in the second half of conferences. Analysis by country showed that, in contrast to different quantitative designs, the proportion of qualitative studies was comparable. CONCLUSIONS To test effectiveness of diagnostic and therapeutic interventions under primary care conditions, a higher proportion of experimental studies would be preferable. This could increase the acceptance of general practitioners' specific approaches and provide clear guidance on approaches and procedures, especially in health care systems not predominantly based on primary care.

[1]  M Wood,et al.  Research in family medicine. , 1977, The Journal of family practice.

[2]  K. White,et al.  Clinical epidemiology. , 1983, International journal of epidemiology.

[3]  Larry Reznick,et al.  Setting priorities , 1994 .

[4]  T. Fahey,et al.  The content and methodology of research papers published in three United Kingdom primary care journals. , 1998, The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners.

[5]  C. Pope,et al.  Qualitative Research in Health Care , 1999 .

[6]  S. Ziebland,et al.  Analysing qualitative data , 2000, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[7]  Sue Ziebland,et al.  Analysing qualitative data , 2000, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[8]  Janet M. Corrigan,et al.  Background and Methodology , 2000 .

[9]  L. Jabaaij Verwijzingen naar de geestelijke gezondheidszorg in 2000 , 2001 .

[10]  Liam Smeeth,et al.  Randomised controlled trials in primary care: scope and application. , 2002, The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners.

[11]  Justin Allen,et al.  The European definitions of the key features of the discipline of general practice: the role of the GP and core competencies. , 2002, The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners.

[12]  Jan De Maeseneer,et al.  Why research in family medicine? A superfluous question. , 2004 .

[13]  C. van Weel,et al.  Improving Health Care Globally: A Critical Review of the Necessity of Family Medicine Research and Recommendations to Build Research Capacity , 2004, The Annals of Family Medicine.

[14]  C. van Weel,et al.  Research in Family/General Practice is Essential for Improving Health Globally , 2004, The Annals of Family Medicine.

[15]  C Lionis,et al.  Setting priorities and identifying barriers for general practice research in Europe. Results from an EGPRW meeting. , 2004, Family practice.

[16]  D. Pierson,et al.  The top 10 reasons why manuscripts are not accepted for publication. , 2004, Respiratory care.

[17]  I. Ovhed,et al.  What is the future of primary care research? , 2005, Scandinavian journal of primary health care.

[18]  C. Weel Longitudinal Research and Data Collection in Primary Care , 2005 .

[19]  C. van Weel,et al.  Longitudinal Research and Data Collection in Primary Care , 2005, The Annals of Family Medicine.

[20]  Chris van Weel,et al.  The importance of longitudinal studies in family medicine: experiences of two practice-based research networks. , 2006, Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine : JABFM.

[21]  I. Svab,et al.  Towards the establishment of a new target strategy for WONCA Europe: A key informants study , 2008, The European journal of general practice.

[22]  J. Soler,et al.  The Research Agenda for General Practice/Family Medicine and Primary Health Care in Europe. Part 1. Background and methodology1 , 2009, The European journal of general practice.

[23]  L. Green Series: The research agenda for general practice/family medicine and primary health care in Europe. Part 2. Results: Primary care management and community orientation , 2010, The European journal of general practice.

[24]  Maria Jirwe,et al.  Analysing qualitative data. , 2011, Nurse researcher.