Bayesian uncertainty quantification applied to RANS turbulence models

A Bayesian uncertainty quantification approach is developed and applied to RANS turbulence models of fully-developed channel flow. The approach aims to capture uncertainty due to both uncertain parameters and model inadequacy. Parameter uncertainty is represented by treating the parameters of the turbulence model as random variables. To capture model uncertainty, four stochastic extensions of four eddy viscosity turbulence models are developed. The sixteen coupled models are calibrated using DNS data according to Bayes' theorem, producing posterior probability density functions. In addition, the competing models are compared in terms of two items: posterior plausibility and predictions of a quantity of interest. The posterior plausibility indicates which model is preferred by the data according to Bayes' theorem, while the predictions allow assessment of how strongly the model differences impact the quantity of interest. Results for the channel flow case show that both the stochastic model and the turbulence model affect the predicted quantity of interest. The posterior plausibility favors an inhomogeneous stochastic model coupled with the Chien k-ϵ model. After calibration with data at Reτ = 944 and Reτ = 2003, this model gives a prediction of the centerline velocity at Reτ = 5000 with uncertainty of approximately ± 4%.

[1]  Sai Hung Cheung,et al.  Bayesian uncertainty analysis with applications to turbulence modeling , 2011, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[2]  Karl W. Schulz,et al.  The Parallel C++ Statistical Library 'QUESO': Quantification of Uncertainty for Estimation, Simulation and Optimization , 2011, Euro-Par Workshops.

[3]  Qiqi Wang,et al.  Quantification of structural uncertainties in the k − ω turbulence model , 2010 .

[4]  Gianluca Iaccarino,et al.  Modeling Structural Uncertainties in Reynolds-Averaged Computations of Shock/Boundary Layer Interactions , 2011 .

[5]  Abdelkader Frendi,et al.  Uncertainty Quantification of Turbulence Model Coefficients via Latin Hypercube Sampling Method , 2011 .

[6]  David L. Darmofal,et al.  Impact of Turbulence Model Irregularity on High-Order Discretizations , 2009 .

[7]  Carl E. Rasmussen,et al.  Gaussian processes for machine learning , 2005, Adaptive computation and machine learning.

[8]  Javier Jiménez,et al.  Reynolds number effects on the Reynolds-stress budgets in turbulent channels , 2008 .

[9]  Hester Bijl,et al.  Uncertainty Quantification Applied to the k-epsilon Model of Turbulence Using the Probabilistic Collocation Method , 2008 .

[10]  Javier Jiménez,et al.  Scaling of the velocity fluctuations in turbulent channels up to Reτ=2003 , 2006 .

[11]  Albert Tarantola,et al.  Inverse problem theory - and methods for model parameter estimation , 2004 .

[12]  J. Beck,et al.  Model Selection using Response Measurements: Bayesian Probabilistic Approach , 2004 .

[13]  Javier Jiménez,et al.  Scaling of the energy spectra of turbulent channels , 2003, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[14]  M. Tribus,et al.  Probability theory: the logic of science , 2003 .

[15]  P. Durbin,et al.  Statistical Theory and Modeling for Turbulent Flows , 2001 .

[16]  P. Durbin SEPARATED FLOW COMPUTATIONS WITH THE K-E-V2 MODEL , 1995 .

[17]  D. Wilcox Turbulence modeling for CFD , 1993 .

[18]  P. Spalart A One-Equation Turbulence Model for Aerodynamic Flows , 1992 .

[19]  P. Durbin Near-wall turbulence closure modeling without “damping functions” , 1991, Theoretical and Computational Fluid Dynamics.

[20]  K. Chien,et al.  Predictions of Channel and Boundary-Layer Flows with a Low-Reynolds-Number Turbulence Model , 1982 .

[21]  H. Lomax,et al.  Thin-layer approximation and algebraic model for separated turbulent flows , 1978 .