Game Elements-Attributes Model: a First Step towards a Structured Comparison of Educational Games

Research on the comparison of different design options and implementation choices for digital educational games (DEGs) is lacking, despite the possibly crucial impact of these options on the learning outcome. Although game features with the potential to support learning have been identified and reported in the literature, an underlying comprehensive game model, providing structure for a comparison study and ensuring completeness in covering of all relevant features, is needed. To address this issue a literature search for game models was conducted and the resulting models were analysed for their applicability in this case. Several limitations and shortcomings of the existing models drove us to develop the Game Elements-Attributes Model (GEAM) by consolidating game definitions and models identified from an extensive literature review. GEAM can serve as a foundation for the comparison of DEGs or digital games in general, but may also be valuable for other areas of game studies.

[1]  Tracy Fullerton,et al.  Game Design Workshop: A Playcentric Approach to Creating Innovative Games, Third Edition , 2014 .

[2]  Katie Salen,et al.  Rules of play: game design fundamentals , 2003 .

[3]  Paul A. Cairns,et al.  Assessing the Core Elements of the Gaming Experience , 2015, Game User Experience Evaluation.

[4]  Jean-Pierre Jessel,et al.  A Gameplay Definition through Videogame Classification , 2008, Int. J. Comput. Games Technol..

[5]  Julia Eichmann,et al.  Challenges For Game Designers , 2016 .

[6]  Juho Hamari,et al.  Defining gamification: a service marketing perspective , 2012, MindTrek.

[7]  Theodore Lim,et al.  Engineering design using game-enhanced CAD: The potential to augment the user experience with game elements , 2013, Comput. Aided Des..

[8]  Effie Lai-Chong Law,et al.  Evaluating design elements for digital educational games on programming: a pilot study , 2012, BCS HCI.

[9]  Robert Zubek,et al.  MDA : A Formal Approach to Game Design and Game Research , 2004 .

[10]  Jesper Juul,et al.  The game, the player, the world: looking for a heart of gameness , 2010, DiGRA Conference.

[11]  Lennart E. Nacke,et al.  From game design elements to gamefulness: defining "gamification" , 2011, MindTrek.

[12]  Ernest Adams,et al.  Andrew Rollings and Ernest Adams on Game Design , 2003 .

[13]  Eduardo Salas,et al.  Toward a Taxonomy Linking Game Attributes to Learning , 2012 .

[14]  Thomas W. Malone,et al.  Toward a Theory of Intrinsically Motivating Instruction , 1981, Cogn. Sci..

[15]  Alan Amory,et al.  Game object model version II: a theoretical framework for educational game development , 2007 .

[16]  Jesper Juul.  Half-Real: Video Games between Real Rules and Fictional Worlds , 2005 .

[17]  Jonas Heide Smith,et al.  Understanding Video Games: The Essential Introduction , 2008 .

[18]  Ernest Adams,et al.  Fundamentals of Game Design , 2006 .

[19]  Kristian Kiili,et al.  Foundation for problem-based gaming , 2007, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[20]  Staffan Björk,et al.  Patterns In Game Design , 2004 .

[21]  Stefan Greuter,et al.  Towards personalised, gamified systems: an investigation into game design, personality and player typologies , 2013, IE.

[22]  David Rusel DeMaria Perry.  Game design : a brainstorming toolbox , 2014 .

[23]  Sergi Villagrasa Falip,et al.  Gamification for learning 3D computer graphics arts , 2013, TEEM '13.

[24]  Espen Aarseth,et al.  Game Classification as Game Design: Construction Through Critical Analysis , 2005, DiGRA Conference.

[25]  Jan H. G. Klabbers,et al.  Terminological Ambiguity , 2009 .

[26]  James E. Driskell,et al.  Games, Motivation, and Learning: A Research and Practice Model , 2002 .

[27]  Paul A. Cairns,et al.  Assessing the Core Elements of the Gaming Experience , 2010, Evaluating User Experience in Games.

[28]  Kara L. Orvis,et al.  Relationships Between Game Attributes and Learning Outcomes , 2009 .