Impact of Using an Educational Robot-Based Learning System on Students’ Motivation in Elementary Education

Educational robotics has been regarded as an effective instructional tool over the past decade. Many studies have tested the role of robots in supporting educational classroom activities. However, reliable empirical evidence confirming the effectiveness of educational robots remains limited. Therefore, this study developed an educational robot-based learning system that provides an attractive teaching application that combines multimedia objects with an educational robot. This study examined the impact of the proposed learning system on student learning performance and motivation. The four-stage experimental procedure involved a pre-test, post-test, learning activities, and questionnaire survey. The participants comprised one homeroom teacher and 52 second-grade students from two classes at an elementary school in Taiwan. All of the students were assigned to use either the proposed learning system or a PowerPoint-based learning system. The pre-test and post-test results show that the proposed learning system improved student performance more than the PowerPoint-based learning system did. A questionnaire based on the Instructional Materials Motivation Survey (IMMS) was employed to measure four motivational factors (attention, relevance, confidence, and satisfaction). The IMMS survey results show that satisfaction and relevance were the highest rated motivational factors among students who used the proposed learning system. The experimental results indicate that the students were motivated to use the educational robot-based learning system. Thus, using educational robot-based learning systems in classrooms demonstrates a significant advantage for students, by improving overall learning interest and motivation.

[1]  Frank Klassner,et al.  LEGO MindStorms: not just for K-12 anymore , 2003, IEEE Robotics Autom. Mag..

[2]  Alissa Nicole Antle,et al.  Are tangibles more fun?: comparing children's enjoyment and engagement using physical, graphical and tangible user interfaces , 2008, TEI.

[3]  John M. Keller,et al.  First principles of motivation to learn and e3‐learning , 2008 .

[4]  P.K. Imbrie,et al.  Learning motivation evaluation for a computer-based instructional tutorial using ARCS model of motivational design , 2004, 34th Annual Frontiers in Education, 2004. FIE 2004..

[5]  Wen-Hao Huang,et al.  Sustaining iterative game playing processes in DGBL: The relationship between motivational processing and outcome processing , 2010, Comput. Educ..

[6]  Fabiane Barreto Vavassori Benitti,et al.  Exploring the educational potential of robotics in schools: A systematic review , 2012, Comput. Educ..

[7]  Jacob Cohen Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences , 1969, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[8]  Doris U. Bolliger,et al.  Impact of podcasting on student motivation in the online learning environment , 2010, Comput. Educ..

[9]  Futoshi Naya,et al.  Differences in effect of robot and screen agent recommendations on human decision-making , 2005, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[10]  Irad Ben-Gal,et al.  Evaluation of Telerobotic Interface Components for Teaching Robot Operation , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies.

[11]  Carlos Delgado Kloos,et al.  Impact of an augmented reality system on students' motivation for a visual art course , 2013, Comput. Educ..

[12]  Leo Hartman,et al.  An Intelligent Simulator for Telerobotics Training , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies.

[13]  John Keller,et al.  Learner motivation and E-learning design: A multinationally validated process , 2004 .

[14]  Seymour Papert,et al.  Mindstorms: Children, Computers, and Powerful Ideas , 1981 .

[15]  Edward M. Sims Reusable, lifelike virtual humans for mentoring and role-playing , 2007, Comput. Educ..

[16]  Chih-Wei Chang,et al.  Improving the authentic learning experience by integrating robots into the mixed-reality environment , 2010, Comput. Educ..

[17]  Liang-Yi Li,et al.  Researches on Using Robots in Education , 2009, Edutainment.

[18]  C. Taran,et al.  Motivation techniques in elearning , 2005, Fifth IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT'05).

[19]  Po-Yao Chao,et al.  Exploring the Possibility of Using Humanoid Robots as Instructional Tools for Teaching a Second Language in Primary School , 2010, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..

[20]  Sungho Kim,et al.  The educational use of home robots for children , 2005, ROMAN 2005. IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, 2005..

[21]  Pierre Dillenbourg,et al.  Design for classroom orchestration , 2013, Comput. Educ..

[22]  Chih-Wei Chang,et al.  A Robot as a Teaching Assistant in an English Class , 2006 .

[23]  Michael Zyda,et al.  Extensible Modeling and Simulation Framework (XMSF) Opportunities for Web-Based Modeling and Simulation , 2002 .

[24]  Kerstin Dautenhahn,et al.  Robots in the classroom: tools for accessible education , 1999 .

[25]  P. Lachenbruch Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed.) , 1989 .

[26]  J. Keller Development and use of the ARCS model of instructional design , 1987 .

[27]  Sonya S. Kwak,et al.  A Study on External Form Design Factors for Robots as Elementary School Teaching Assistants , 2007, RO-MAN 2007 - The 16th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication.

[28]  Jeonghye Han,et al.  Analysis on Children's Tolerance to Weak Recognition of Storytelling Robots , 2009, J. Convergence Inf. Technol..

[29]  Davinia Hernández Leo,et al.  Technology-Supported Orchestration Matters: Outperforming Paper-Based Scripting in a Jigsaw Classroom , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies.

[30]  D. Cook,et al.  Measuring Motivational Characteristics of Courses: Applying Keller's Instructional Materials Motivation Survey to a Web-Based Course , 2009, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.

[31]  Takayuki Kanda,et al.  Interactive Robots as Social Partners and Peer Tutors for Children: A Field Trial , 2004, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[32]  Dongho Kim,et al.  r-Learning services for elementary school students with a teaching assistant robot , 2009, 2009 4th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).

[33]  Tulio Sulbaran,et al.  Motivation Assessment Instrument for Virtual Reality Scheduling Simulator , 2006 .

[34]  Sungju Park,et al.  Comparative study of effects of language instruction program using intelligence robot and multimedia on linguistic ability of young children , 2008, RO-MAN 2008 - The 17th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication.

[35]  Mitsuru Ishizuka,et al.  Development of Multimodal Presentation Markup Language MPML-HR for Humanoid Robots and its Psychological Evaluation , 2007, Int. J. Humanoid Robotics.

[36]  Yuxin Ma,et al.  Acquisition of Physics Content Knowledge and Scientific Inquiry Skills in a Robotics Summer Camp , 2007 .