Evaluation of microRNA variant maturation prior to genome edition

Assessment of the functionality of individual microRNA/target sites is a crucial issue. Genome editing techniques should theoretically permit a fine functional exploration of such interactions, allowing the mutation of microRNAs or individual binding sites in a complete in vivo setting, therefore abrogating or restoring individual interactions on demand. A major limitation to this experimental strategy is the influence of microRNA sequence on its accumulation level, which introduces a confounding effect when assessing phenotypic rescue by compensatorily mutated microRNA and target site. Here we describe a simple assay to identify microRNA variants most likely to accumulate at wild-type levels even though their sequence has been mutated. In this assay, quantification of a reporter construct in cultured cells predicts the efficiency of an early biogenesis step, the Drosha-dependent cleavage of microRNA precursors, which appears to be a major determinant of microRNA accumulation in our variant collection. This system allowed the generation of a mutant Drosophila strain expressing a bantam microRNA variant at wild-type levels.

[1]  H. Seitz,et al.  Synthetic miR-34a against solid tumours: a predictable failure , 2022, British Journal of Cancer.

[2]  D. Haselbach,et al.  miR-1 sustains muscle physiology by controlling V-ATPase complex assembly , 2021, Science advances.

[3]  L. Ding,et al.  Global miRNA dosage control of embryonic germ layer specification , 2021, Nature.

[4]  Benedikt G. Brink,et al.  Efficient and specific oligo-based depletion of rRNA , 2019, Scientific Reports.

[5]  H. Grosshans,et al.  let-7 coordinates the transition to adulthood through a single primary and four secondary targets , 2019, Life Science Alliance.

[6]  V. Kim,et al.  Bias-minimized quantification of microRNA reveals widespread alternative processing and 3′ end modification , 2019, Nucleic acids research.

[7]  D. Bartel,et al.  Genetic dissection of the miR-200–Zeb1 axis reveals its importance in tumor differentiation and invasion , 2018, Nature Communications.

[8]  D. Bartel.  Metazoan MicroRNAs , 2018, Cell.

[9]  C. Shin,et al.  Emerging roles of DROSHA beyond primary microRNA processing , 2018, RNA biology.

[10]  Mehul M. Vora,et al.  Efficient Screening of CRISPR/Cas9-Induced Events in Drosophila Using a Co-CRISPR Strategy , 2016, G3: Genes, Genomes, Genetics.

[11]  D. Bartel,et al.  The Menu of Features that Define Primary MicroRNAs and Enable De Novo Design of MicroRNA Genes. , 2015, Molecular cell.

[12]  H. Grosshans,et al.  The let-7 microRNA directs vulval development through a single target. , 2015, Developmental cell.

[13]  Philip A. Ewels,et al.  Understanding functional miRNA–target interactions in vivo by site-specific genome engineering , 2014, Nature Communications.

[14]  Simon L. Bullock,et al.  Optimized CRISPR/Cas tools for efficient germline and somatic genome engineering in Drosophila , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[15]  Yue Zhang,et al.  The Loop Position of shRNAs and Pre-miRNAs Is Critical for the Accuracy of Dicer Processing In Vivo , 2012, Cell.

[16]  R. Sachidanandam,et al.  Identification and remediation of biases in the activity of RNA ligases in small-RNA deep sequencing , 2011, Nucleic acids research.

[17]  S. Cohen,et al.  Notch-mediated repression of bantam miRNA contributes to boundary formation in the Drosophila wing , 2011, Development.

[18]  Hervé Seitz,et al.  Redefining MicroRNA Targets , 2009, Current Biology.

[19]  M. Heller,et al.  Systematic Functional Analysis of Bicaudal-D Serine Phosphorylation and Intragenic Suppression of a Female Sterile Allele of BicD , 2009, PloS one.

[20]  R. Maeda,et al.  An optimized transgenesis system for Drosophila using germ-line-specific φC31 integrases , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[21]  Satoshi Shibata,et al.  Exportin-5 orthologues are functionally divergent among species , 2006, Nucleic acids research.

[22]  Byoung-Tak Zhang,et al.  Molecular Basis for the Recognition of Primary microRNAs by the Drosha-DGCR8 Complex , 2006, Cell.

[23]  A. Denli,et al.  Normal microRNA Maturation and Germ-Line Stem Cell Maintenance Requires Loquacious, a Double-Stranded RNA-Binding Domain Protein , 2005, PLoS biology.

[24]  K. Czaplinski,et al.  Exportin 5 is a RanGTP-dependent dsRNA-binding protein that mediates nuclear export of pre-miRNAs. , 2004, RNA.

[25]  U. Kutay,et al.  Nuclear Export of MicroRNA Precursors , 2004, Science.

[26]  B. Cullen,et al.  Exportin-5 mediates the nuclear export of pre-microRNAs and short hairpin RNAs. , 2003, Genes & development.

[27]  S. Jayasena,et al.  Functional siRNAs and miRNAs Exhibit Strand Bias , 2003, Cell.

[28]  T. Du,et al.  Asymmetry in the Assembly of the RNAi Enzyme Complex , 2003, Cell.

[29]  Serge Batalov,et al.  Identification of modulators of TRAIL-induced apoptosis via RNAi-based phenotypic screening. , 2003, Molecular cell.

[30]  R. Russell,et al.  bantam Encodes a Developmentally Regulated microRNA that Controls Cell Proliferation and Regulates the Proapoptotic Gene hid in Drosophila , 2003, Cell.

[31]  S. Cohen,et al.  The bantam gene regulates Drosophila growth. , 2002, Genetics.

[32]  A. Ishimoto,et al.  Identification and Characterization of a Novel Line ofDrosophila Schneider S2 Cells That Respond to Wingless Signaling* , 1998, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[33]  P. Rørth.  Gal4 in the Drosophila female germline , 1998, Mechanisms of Development.

[34]  Sophie Mockly,et al.  Inconsistencies and Limitations of Current MicroRNA Target Identification Methods. , 2019, Methods in molecular biology.