Tool wear condition monitoring in drilling operations using hidden Markov models (HMMs)

Monitoring of tool wear condition for drilling is a very important economical consideration in automated manufacturing. Two techniques are proposed in this paper for the on-line identification of tool wear based on the measurement of cutting forces and power signals. These techniques use hidden Markov models (HMMs), commonly used in speech recognition. In the first method, bargraph monitoring of the HMM probabilities is used to track the progress of tool wear during the drilling operation. In the second method, sensor signals that correspond to various types of wear status, e.g., sharp, workable and dull, are classified using a multiple modeling method. Experimental results demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed methods. Although this work focuses on on-line tool wear condition monitoring for drilling operations, the HMM monitoring techniques introduced in this paper can be applied to other cutting processes.

[1]  Hang Joon Kim,et al.  An HMM-based character recognition network using level building , 1997, Pattern Recognit..

[2]  A. Galip Ulsoy,et al.  Feed, Speed, and Torque Controllers for Drilling , 1996 .

[3]  W. S. Lau,et al.  In-process drill wear and breakage monitoring for a machining centre based on cutting force parameters , 1992 .

[4]  Haili Pan,et al.  Monitoring methods of tool wear in a drilling process , 1993 .

[5]  A. Galip Ulsoy,et al.  Dynamic Modeling of the Thrust Force and Torque for Drilling , 1992, 1992 American Control Conference.

[6]  Shane Y. Hong,et al.  Knowledge-based diagnosis of drill conditions , 1993, J. Intell. Manuf..

[7]  Youmin Zhang,et al.  A fault detection and diagnosis approach based on hidden Markov chain model , 1998, Proceedings of the 1998 American Control Conference. ACC (IEEE Cat. No.98CH36207).

[8]  Lawrence R. Rabiner,et al.  A tutorial on hidden Markov models and selected applications in speech recognition , 1989, Proc. IEEE.

[9]  Young-Pil Park,et al.  Development of a drilling process with torque stabilization , 1994 .

[10]  Igor Grabec,et al.  Self-Organizing Neural Network Application to Drill Wear Classification , 1994 .

[11]  Blake Hannaford,et al.  Hidden Markov Model Analysis of Force/Torque Information in Telemanipulation , 1991, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[12]  S. A. Jalali,et al.  Tool life and machinability models for drilling steels , 1991 .

[13]  Shigeyasu Kawaji,et al.  Control of cutting torque in the drilling process using disturbance observer , 1995, Proceedings of 1995 American Control Conference - ACC'95.

[14]  T. I. Liu,et al.  Intelligent Classification and Measurement of Drill Wear , 1994 .

[15]  Y. S. Tarng,et al.  Modeling and optimization of drilling process , 1998 .

[16]  K. Subramanian,et al.  Sensing of Drill Wear and Prediction of Drill Life , 1977 .

[17]  R. Isermann,et al.  Model based detection of tool wear and breakage for machine tools , 1993, Proceedings of IEEE Systems Man and Cybernetics Conference - SMC.

[18]  Lane M. D. Owsley,et al.  Self-organizing feature maps and hidden Markov models for machine-tool monitoring , 1997, IEEE Trans. Signal Process..

[19]  Geir Hovland,et al.  Hidden Markov Models as a Process Monitor in Robotic Assembly , 1998, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[20]  Andrew J. Viterbi,et al.  Error bounds for convolutional codes and an asymptotically optimum decoding algorithm , 1967, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[21]  Jun Ni,et al.  Analysis of drill failure modes by multi-sensors on a robotic end effector , 1996 .

[22]  John B. Moore,et al.  Hidden Markov Models: Estimation and Control , 1994 .