Recommendations for reporting of systematic reviews and meta-analyses of diagnostic test accuracy: a systematic review

[1]  David Moher,et al.  Preferred Reporting Items for a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Diagnostic Test Accuracy Studies: The PRISMA-DTA Statement , 2018, JAMA.

[2]  P. Bossuyt,et al.  Overinterpretation of Research Findings: Evidence of "Spin" in Systematic Reviews of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies. , 2017, Clinical chemistry.

[3]  D. A. Korevaar,et al.  Treatment of multiple test readers in diagnostic accuracy systematic reviews-meta-analyses of imaging studies. , 2017, European journal of radiology.

[4]  Johannes B Reitsma,et al.  STARD 2015 guidelines for reporting diagnostic accuracy studies: explanation and elaboration , 2016, BMJ Open.

[5]  J. McGowan,et al.  PRESS Peer Review of Electronic Search Strategies: 2015 Guideline Statement. , 2016, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[6]  J. Rawson,et al.  Review of Research Reporting Guidelines for Radiology Researchers. , 2016, Academic radiology.

[7]  D. A. Korevaar,et al.  Meta-Analyses of Diagnostic Accuracy in Imaging Journals: Analysis of Pooling Techniques and Their Effect on Summary Estimates of Diagnostic Accuracy. , 2016, Radiology.

[8]  David Moher,et al.  Increasing value and reducing waste in biomedical research: who's listening? , 2016, The Lancet.

[9]  S. Papatheodorou,et al.  Synthesizing Evidence from Diagnostic Accuracy TEsts: the SEDATE guideline , 2016, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[10]  Rachel Churchill,et al.  ROBIS: A new tool to assess risk of bias in systematic reviews was developed , 2016, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[11]  Hardeep Singh,et al.  Improving Diagnosis in Health Care--The Next Imperative for Patient Safety. , 2015, The New England journal of medicine.

[12]  David Moher,et al.  STARD 2015: an updated list of essential items for reporting diagnostic accuracy studies , 2015, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[13]  R. Riley,et al.  Meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy studies in mental health , 2015, Evidence-Based Mental Health.

[14]  P. Bossuyt,et al.  Pitfalls of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses in Imaging Research. , 2015, Radiology.

[15]  Jared M. Campbell,et al.  Diagnostic test accuracy: methods for systematic review and meta-analysis , 2015, International journal of evidence-based healthcare.

[16]  Emmanuel Lesaffre,et al.  A general framework for comparative Bayesian meta-analysis of diagnostic studies , 2015, BMC Medical Research Methodology.

[17]  Kristian Thorlund,et al.  The PRISMA Extension Statement for Reporting of Systematic Reviews Incorporating Network Meta-analyses of Health Care Interventions: Checklist and Explanations , 2015, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[18]  Richard D Riley,et al.  Preferred Reporting Items for a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Individual Participant Data: The PRISMA-IPD Statement , 2015 .

[19]  Richard D. Riley,et al.  Summarising and validating test accuracy results across multiple studies for use in clinical practice , 2015, Statistics in medicine.

[20]  P. Shekelle,et al.  Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation , 2015, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[21]  P. Shekelle,et al.  Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement , 2015, Systematic Reviews.

[22]  Peter Schlattmann,et al.  Mixture models in diagnostic meta-analyses--clustering summary receiver operating characteristic curves accounted for heterogeneity and correlation. , 2015, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[23]  P. Bossuyt,et al.  Systematic overview finds variation in approaches to investigating and reporting on sources of heterogeneity in systematic reviews of diagnostic studies. , 2014, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[24]  Julie Glanville,et al.  Reporting methodological search filter performance comparisons: a literature review. , 2014, Health information and libraries journal.

[25]  Paul-Christian Bürkner,et al.  Testing for publication bias in diagnostic meta‐analysis: a simulation study , 2014, Statistics in medicine.

[26]  David Moher,et al.  Reducing waste from incomplete or unusable reports of biomedical research , 2014, The Lancet.

[27]  E. Lesaffre,et al.  Bayesian meta‐analysis of diagnostic tests allowing for imperfect reference standards , 2013, Statistics in medicine.

[28]  Kaisra Esmail,et al.  Association of study quality with completeness of reporting: have completeness of reporting and quality of systematic reviews and meta-analyses in major radiology journals changed since publication of the PRISMA statement? , 2013, Radiology.

[29]  J. Glanville,et al.  Search strategies to identify diagnostic accuracy studies in MEDLINE and EMBASE. , 2013, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[30]  T. Trikalinos,et al.  Survey of the methods and reporting practices in published meta‐analyses of test performance: 1987 to 2009 , 2013, Research synthesis methods.

[31]  Johannes B Reitsma,et al.  Variation of a test’s sensitivity and specificity with disease prevalence , 2013, Canadian Medical Association Journal.

[32]  Ruth Garside,et al.  A qualitative study into the difficulties experienced by healthcare decision makers when reading a Cochrane diagnostic test accuracy review , 2013, Systematic Reviews.

[33]  William A. Ghali,et al.  Statistical methods for the meta-analysis of diagnostic tests must take into account the use of surrogate standards. , 2013, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[34]  Yemisi Takwoingi,et al.  Empirical Evidence of the Importance of Comparative Studies of Diagnostic Test Accuracy , 2013, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[35]  Sally Hopewell,et al.  PRISMA for Abstracts: Reporting Systematic Reviews in Journal and Conference Abstracts , 2013, PLoS medicine.

[36]  Patrick M. M. Bossuyt,et al.  Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Diagnostic Test Accuracy , 2013 .

[37]  David Moher,et al.  PRISMA-Equity 2012 Extension: Reporting Guidelines for Systematic Reviews with a Focus on Health Equity , 2012, PLoS medicine.

[38]  J. Dubourg,et al.  Meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy in neurosurgical practice. , 2012, Neurosurgical focus.

[39]  Crystal M. Riley,et al.  Chapter 5: Assessing Risk of Bias as a Domain of Quality in Medical Test Studies , 2012, Journal of General Internal Medicine.

[40]  S. Gilbody,et al.  Should methodological filters for diagnostic test accuracy studies be used in systematic reviews of psychometric instruments? a case study involving screening for postnatal depression , 2012, Systematic Reviews.

[41]  R. Simes,et al.  LINKING THE EVIDENCE: INTERMEDIATE OUTCOMES IN MEDICAL TEST ASSESSMENTS , 2012, International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care.

[42]  M. Quigley,et al.  The assessment of the quality of reporting of meta-analyses in diagnostic research: a systematic review , 2011, BMC medical research methodology.

[43]  Susan Mallett,et al.  QUADAS-2: A Revised Tool for the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies , 2011, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[44]  Julie Glanville,et al.  Inclusion of methodological filters in searches for diagnostic test accuracy studies misses relevant studies. , 2011, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[45]  Brian H Willis,et al.  Uptake of newer methodological developments and the deployment of meta-analysis in diagnostic test research: a systematic review , 2010, BMC medical research methodology.

[46]  Laura A. Levit,et al.  Finding what works in health care : standards for systematic reviews , 2011 .

[47]  S. Greenfield,et al.  COMMITTEE ON STANDARDS FOR DEVELOPING TRUSTWORTHY CLINICAL PRACTICE GUIDELINES , 2011 .

[48]  Katja Jasinskaja,et al.  Elaboration and Explanation ⋆ , 2011 .

[49]  H. Bastian,et al.  Seventy-Five Trials and Eleven Systematic Reviews a Day: How Will We Ever Keep Up? , 2010, PLoS medicine.

[50]  E. Tacconelli.  Systematic reviews: CRD's guidance for undertaking reviews in health care , 2010 .

[51]  D. Moher,et al.  Guidance for Developers of Health Research Reporting Guidelines , 2010, PLoS medicine.

[52]  J Menke,et al.  Bivariate Random-effects Meta-analysis of Sensitivity and Specificity with SAS PROC GLIMMIX , 2009, Methods of Information in Medicine.

[53]  D. Moher,et al.  Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. , 2010, International journal of surgery.

[54]  Theo Stijnen,et al.  Associating explanatory variables with summary receiver operating characteristic curves in diagnostic meta-analysis. , 2009, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[55]  Theo Stijnen,et al.  Multivariate random effects meta-analysis of diagnostic tests with multiple thresholds , 2009, BMC medical research methodology.

[56]  P. Glasziou,et al.  Avoidable waste in the production and reporting of research evidence , 2009, The Lancet.

[57]  J. Ioannidis,et al.  The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration , 2009, Annals of Internal Medicine [serial online].

[58]  A. Ribeiro,et al.  Systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic and prognostic studies: a tutorial. , 2009, Arquivos brasileiros de cardiologia.

[59]  Bert Aertgeerts,et al.  Guidelines for conducting systematic reviews of studies evaluating the accuracy of diagnostic tests , 2009 .

[60]  Akers,et al.  Systematic Reviews [ressource électronique]. CRD's guidance for undertaking reviews in health care , 2009 .

[61]  Richard D Riley,et al.  Meta‐analysis of diagnostic test studies using individual patient data and aggregate data , 2008, Statistics in medicine.

[62]  Patrick Bossuyt,et al.  Systematic Reviews of Diagnostic Test Accuracy , 2008, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[63]  Lucas M. Bachmann,et al.  An empirical comparison of methods for meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy showed hierarchical models are necessary. , 2008, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[64]  Johannes B Reitsma,et al.  Meta-Analysis of Diagnostic Studies: A Comparison of Random Intercept, Normal-Normal, and Binomial-Normal Bivariate Summary ROC Approaches , 2008, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.

[65]  J. Sterne,et al.  Systematic reviews of test accuracy should search a range of databases to identify primary studies. , 2008, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[66]  Theo Stijnen,et al.  The binomial distribution of meta-analysis was preferred to model within-study variability. , 2008, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[67]  J. Grimshaw,et al.  External Validation of a Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews (AMSTAR) , 2007, PloS one.

[68]  S D Walter,et al.  Studies reporting ROC curves of diagnostic and prediction data can be incorporated into meta-analyses using corresponding odds ratios. , 2007, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[69]  Roger M Harbord,et al.  A unification of models for meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy studies. , 2007, Biostatistics.

[70]  David Moher,et al.  Development of AMSTAR: a measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews , 2007, BMC medical research methodology.

[71]  PREVENTING NSAID INDUCED GI COMPLICATIONS: AN ECONOMIC EVALUATION OF ALTERNATIVE STRATEGIES IN CANADA February 13, 2007 Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health (CADTH) , 2007 .

[72]  Steve Halligan,et al.  Systematic reviews of diagnostic tests in cancer: review of methods and reporting , 2006, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[73]  Javier Zamora,et al.  Meta-DiSc : a software for meta-analysis of test accuracy data , 2015 .

[74]  William Hollingworth,et al.  Interrater reliability in assessing quality of diagnostic accuracy studies using the QUADAS tool. A preliminary assessment. , 2006, Academic radiology.

[75]  Johannes B Reitsma,et al.  Evaluation of QUADAS, a tool for the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies , 2006, BMC medical research methodology.

[76]  Roger M. Harbord,et al.  An empirical comparison of methods for meta-analysis of studies of diagnostic accuracy , 2005 .

[77]  Lucas M. Bachmann,et al.  Meta-analysis of studies of diagnostic accuracy: a unified approach , 2005 .

[78]  Johannes B Reitsma,et al.  Bivariate analysis of sensitivity and specificity produces informative summary measures in diagnostic reviews. , 2005, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[79]  J. Ioannidis,et al.  Relative Citation Impact of Various Study Designs in the Health Sciences , 2005, JAMA.

[80]  P. Glasziou,et al.  Identifying studies for systematic reviews of diagnostic tests was difficult due to the poor sensitivity and precision of methodologic filters and the lack of information in the abstract. , 2005, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[81]  J. Deeks,et al.  A methodological review of how heterogeneity has been examined in systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy. , 2005, Health technology assessment.

[82]  Johannes B Reitsma,et al.  A systematic review finds that diagnostic reviews fail to incorporate quality despite available tools. , 2005, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[83]  N. Choudhry,et al.  The conditional relative odds ratio provided less biased results for comparing diagnostic test accuracy in meta-analyses. , 2004, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[84]  C Gatsonis,et al.  Meta‐analysis of Diagnostic Test Accuracy Assessment Studies with Varying Number of Thresholds , 2003, Biometrics.

[85]  P. Bossuyt,et al.  BMC Medical Research Methodology , 2002 .

[86]  Victor M Montori,et al.  Conducting systematic reviews of diagnostic studies: didactic guidelines , 2002, BMC medical research methodology.

[87]  G. ter Riet,et al.  Systematic reviews of evaluations of diagnostic and screening tests , 2001, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[88]  R. Harbour,et al.  A new system for grading recommendations in evidence based guidelines , 2001, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[89]  Jonathan J Deeks,et al.  Systematic reviews in health care: Systematic reviews of evaluations of diagnostic and screening tests. , 2001, BMJ.

[90]  I. Olkin,et al.  Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology - A proposal for reporting , 2000 .

[91]  S D Walter,et al.  Meta-analysis of diagnostic tests with imperfect reference standards. , 1999, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[92]  V. Velanovich.  Meta-analysis for combining Bayesian probabilities. , 1991, Medical hypotheses.