A Federated Network for Translational Cancer Research Using Clinical Data and Biospecimens.

Advances in cancer research and personalized medicine will require significant new bridging infrastructures, including more robust biorepositories that link human tissue to clinical phenotypes and outcomes. In order to meet that challenge, four cancer centers formed the Text Information Extraction System (TIES) Cancer Research Network, a federated network that facilitates data and biospecimen sharing among member institutions. Member sites can access pathology data that are de-identified and processed with the TIES natural language processing system, which creates a repository of rich phenotype data linked to clinical biospecimens. TIES incorporates multiple security and privacy best practices that, combined with legal agreements, network policies, and procedures, enable regulatory compliance. The TIES Cancer Research Network now provides integrated access to investigators at all member institutions, where multiple investigator-driven pilot projects are underway. Examples of federated search across the network illustrate the potential impact on translational research, particularly for studies involving rare cancers, rare phenotypes, and specific biologic behaviors. The network satisfies several key desiderata including local control of data and credentialing, inclusion of rich phenotype information, and applicability to diverse research objectives. The TIES Cancer Research Network presents a model for a national data and biospecimen network.

[1]  S. Reis,et al.  The Sharing Partnership for Innovative Research in Translation (SPIRiT) Consortium: A Model for Collaboration across CTSA Sites , 2013, Clinical and translational science.

[2]  F. Collins,et al.  A new initiative on precision medicine. , 2015, The New England journal of medicine.

[3]  B. Fitzgerald Guidance Regarding Methods for De-identification of Protected Health Information in Accordance with the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) Privacy Rule , 2015 .

[4]  Lucila Ohno-Machado,et al.  pSCANNER: patient-centered Scalable National Network for Effectiveness Research , 2014, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[5]  W E Grizzle,et al.  Establishing a tumour bank: banking, informatics and ethics , 2004, British Journal of Cancer.

[6]  Lonnie Blevins,et al.  A system for sharing routine surgical pathology specimens across institutions: the Shared Pathology Informatics Network. , 2007, Human pathology.

[7]  Shikhar Uttam,et al.  Nanoscale nuclear architecture for cancer diagnosis beyond pathology via spatial-domain low-coherence quantitative phase microscopy. , 2010, Journal of biomedical optics.

[8]  Waqas Amin,et al.  Design and utilization of the colorectal and pancreatic neoplasm virtual biorepository: An early detection research network initiative , 2010, Journal of pathology informatics.

[9]  Douglas MacFadden,et al.  Application of Information Technology The Shared Health Research Information Network ( SHRINE ) : A Prototype Federated Query Tool for Clinical Data Repositories , 2014 .

[10]  Rajiv Dhir,et al.  A multidisciplinary approach to honest broker services for tissue banks and clinical data , 2008, Cancer.

[11]  Isaac S Kohane,et al.  Model Formulation: A Self-scaling, Distributed Information Architecture for Public Health, Research, and Clinical Care , 2007, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[12]  F. Collins,et al.  The path to personalized medicine. , 2010, The New England journal of medicine.

[13]  Isaac S Kohane,et al.  Federalist principles for healthcare data networks , 2015, Nature Biotechnology.

[14]  Michael Feldman,et al.  caTIES: a grid based system for coding and retrieval of surgical pathology reports and tissue specimens in support of translational research , 2010, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[15]  Jim Vaught,et al.  A review of international biobanks and networks: success factors and key benchmarks. , 2009, Biopreservation and biobanking.

[16]  Michael J. Becich,et al.  PaTH: towards a learning health system in the Mid-Atlantic region , 2014, Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA.

[17]  C. Jack,et al.  Ways toward an early diagnosis in Alzheimer’s disease: The Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) , 2005, Alzheimer's & Dementia.

[18]  Judy Illes,et al.  Personal medicine—the new banking crisis , 2012, Nature Biotechnology.

[19]  Kenneth H Buetow,et al.  An infrastructure for interconnecting research institutions. , 2009, Drug discovery today.

[20]  Frank J. Manion,et al.  Security and privacy requirements for a multi-institutional cancer research data grid: an interview-based study , 2009, BMC Medical Informatics Decis. Mak..

[21]  Bruce R. Rosen,et al.  Enabling collaborative research using the Biomedical Informatics Research Network (BIRN) , 2011, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[22]  J. Gilbertson,et al.  Evaluation of a deidentification (De-Id) software engine to share pathology reports and clinical documents for research. , 2004, American journal of clinical pathology.

[23]  Louise C. Showe,et al.  A Novel Cross-Disciplinary Multi-Institute Approach to Translational Cancer Research: Lessons Learned from Pennsylvania Cancer Alliance Bioinformatics Consortium (PCABC) , 2007, Cancer informatics.