The relationship between classification of multi-domain proteins using an alignment-free approach and their functions: a case study with immunoglobulins.
暂无分享,去创建一个
Narayanaswamy Srinivasan | Mutharasu Gnanavel | Prachi Mehrotra | Ramachandra M Bhaskara | Ramaswamy Rakshambikai | Juliette Martin | N. Srinivasan | Juliette Martin | Prachi Mehrotra | M. Gnanavel | R. Rakshambikai | R. Bhaskara
[1] W. Doolittle,et al. Reconstructing/Deconstructing the Earliest Eukaryotes How Comparative Genomics Can Help , 2001, Cell.
[2] Narayanaswamy Srinivasan,et al. Classification of Protein Kinases on the Basis of Both Kinase and Non-Kinase Regions , 2010, PloS one.
[3] Peer Bork,et al. Interactive Tree Of Life (iTOL): an online tool for phylogenetic tree display and annotation , 2007, Bioinform..
[4] Rodrigo Lopez,et al. Multiple sequence alignment with the Clustal series of programs , 2003, Nucleic Acids Res..
[5] Geoffrey J. Barton,et al. Kinomer v. 1.0: a database of systematically classified eukaryotic protein kinases , 2008, Nucleic Acids Res..
[6] T. Hunter,et al. The protein kinase family: conserved features and deduced phylogeny of the catalytic domains. , 1988, Science.
[7] R. Russell,et al. Domain Recombination: A Workhorse for Evolutionary Innovation , 2010, Science Signaling.
[8] F. Collins,et al. A vision for the future of genomics research , 2003, Nature.
[9] Warren C. Lathe,et al. Predicting protein function by genomic context: quantitative evaluation and qualitative inferences. , 2000, Genome research.
[10] D. Higgins,et al. Fast, scalable generation of high-quality protein multiple sequence alignments using Clustal Omega , 2011, Molecular systems biology.
[11] C. Chothia,et al. The generation of new protein functions by the combination of domains. , 2007, Structure.
[12] D. Lipman,et al. A genomic perspective on protein families. , 1997, Science.
[13] Narayanaswamy Srinivasan,et al. KinG: a database of protein kinases in genomes , 2004, Nucleic Acids Res..
[14] David A. Lee,et al. Comprehensive genome analysis of 203 genomes provides structural genomics with new insights into protein family space , 2006, Nucleic acids research.
[15] A. Elofsson,et al. Multi-domain proteins in the three kingdoms of life: orphan domains and other unassigned regions. , 2005, Journal of molecular biology.
[16] Nick V Grishin,et al. Sequence and structure classification of kinases. , 2002, Journal of molecular biology.
[17] F. Delsuc,et al. Phylogenomics and the reconstruction of the tree of life , 2005, Nature Reviews Genetics.
[18] T. Hunter,et al. The eukaryotic protein kinase superfamily: kinase (catalytic) domain structure and classification 1 , 1995, FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology.
[19] G. Caetano-Anollés,et al. Global phylogeny determined by the combination of protein domains in proteomes. , 2006, Molecular biology and evolution.
[20] D. Lipman,et al. Rapid similarity searches of nucleic acid and protein data banks. , 1983, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[21] E. Koonin,et al. The structure of the protein universe and genome evolution , 2002, Nature.
[22] C Chothia,et al. Many of the immunoglobulin superfamily domains in cell adhesion molecules and surface receptors belong to a new structural set which is close to that containing variable domains. , 1994, Journal of molecular biology.
[23] M. Ashburner,et al. Gene Ontology: tool for the unification of biology , 2000, Nature Genetics.
[24] R. Durbin,et al. Pfam: A comprehensive database of protein domain families based on seed alignments , 1997, Proteins.
[25] Erik L. L. Sonnhammer,et al. Predicting protein function from domain content , 2008, Bioinform..
[26] T. Hunter,et al. The mouse kinome: discovery and comparative genomics of all mouse protein kinases. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[27] Philip Resnik,et al. Semantic Similarity in a Taxonomy: An Information-Based Measure and its Application to Problems of Ambiguity in Natural Language , 1999, J. Artif. Intell. Res..
[28] J. H. Ward. Hierarchical Grouping to Optimize an Objective Function , 1963 .
[29] S. Teichmann,et al. Domain combinations in archaeal, eubacterial and eukaryotic proteomes. , 2001, Journal of molecular biology.
[30] C. Chothia,et al. Structure, function and evolution of multidomain proteins. , 2004, Current opinion in structural biology.
[31] H. Mewes,et al. The FunCat, a functional annotation scheme for systematic classification of proteins from whole genomes. , 2004, Nucleic acids research.
[32] D. Higgins,et al. See Blockindiscussions, Blockinstats, Blockinand Blockinauthor Blockinprofiles Blockinfor Blockinthis Blockinpublication Clustal: Blockina Blockinpackage Blockinfor Blockinperforming Multiple Blockinsequence Blockinalignment Blockinon Blockina Minicomputer Article Blockin Blockinin Blockin , 2022 .
[33] Mario Cannataro,et al. Semantic similarity analysis of protein data: assessment with biological features and issues , 2012, Briefings Bioinform..
[34] D. Robinson,et al. Comparison of phylogenetic trees , 1981 .
[35] E. Sonnhammer,et al. Evolution of protein domain architectures. , 2012, Methods in molecular biology.
[36] W. Lim,et al. Domains, motifs, and scaffolds: the role of modular interactions in the evolution and wiring of cell signaling circuits. , 2006, Annual review of biochemistry.
[37] P. Holland,et al. Phylogenomics of eukaryotes: impact of missing data on large alignments. , 2004, Molecular biology and evolution.
[38] E. Birney,et al. Comparative genomics: genome-wide analysis in metazoan eukaryotes , 2003, Nature Reviews Genetics.
[39] M. Levandowsky,et al. Distance between Sets , 1971, Nature.
[40] Sarah A. Teichmann,et al. An insight into domain combinations , 2001, ISMB.
[41] Lei Zhu,et al. An initial strategy for comparing proteins at the domain architecture level , 2006, Bioinform..
[42] Chris P. Ponting,et al. Issues in Predicting Protein Function From Sequence , 2001, Briefings Bioinform..
[43] E. Koonin,et al. Evolution of protein domain promiscuity in eukaryotes. , 2008, Genome research.
[44] T. Hunter,et al. The Protein Kinase Complement of the Human Genome , 2002, Science.
[45] A. F. Williams,et al. The immunoglobulin superfamily--domains for cell surface recognition. , 1988, Annual review of immunology.
[46] Robert D. Finn,et al. InterPro in 2011: new developments in the family and domain prediction database , 2011, Nucleic acids research.
[47] L. Holm,et al. The Pfam protein families database , 2005, Nucleic Acids Res..
[48] Eugene V Koonin,et al. Comparative genomics and structural biology of the molecular innovations of eukaryotes. , 2006, Current opinion in structural biology.
[49] E. Koonin,et al. Birth and death of protein domains: A simple model of evolution explains power law behavior , 2002, BMC Evolutionary Biology.
[50] Iddo Friedberg,et al. Automated protein function predictionçthe genomic challenge , 2006 .
[51] N Srinivasan,et al. The repertoire of protein kinases encoded in the draft version of the human genome: atypical variations and uncommon domain combinations , 2002, Genome Biology.
[52] N. Srinivasan,et al. Repertoire of Protein Kinases Encoded in the Genome of Takifugu rubripes , 2012, Comparative and functional genomics.
[53] T. Hunter,et al. Evolution of protein kinase signaling from yeast to man. , 2002, Trends in biochemical sciences.
[54] M. R. Adams,et al. Comparative genomics of the eukaryotes. , 2000, Science.