Consensus approach for 3D joint space width of metacarpophalangeal joints of rheumatoid arthritis patients using high-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography.

Background Joint space assessment for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) by ordinal conventional radiographic scales is susceptible to floor and ceiling effects. High-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography (HR-pQCT) provides superior resolution, and may detect earlier changes. The goal of this work was to compare existing 3D methods to calculate joint space width (JSW) metrics in human metacarpophalangeal (MCP) joints with HR-pQCT and reach consensus for future studies. Using the consensus method, we established reproducibility with repositioning as well as feasibility for use in second-generation HR-pQCT scanners. Methods Three published JSW methods were compared using datasets from individuals with RA from three research centers. A SPECTRA consensus method was developed to take advantage of strengths of the individual methods. Using the SPECTRA method, reproducibility after repositioning was tested and agreement between scanner generations was also established. Results When comparing existing JSW methods, excellent agreement was shown for JSW minimum and mean (ICC 0.987-0.996) but not maximum and volume (ICC 0.000-0.897). Differences were identified as variations in volume definitions and algorithmic differences that generated high sensitivity to boundary conditions. The SPECTRA consensus method reduced this sensitivity, demonstrating good scan-rescan reliability (ICC >0.911) except for minimum JSW (ICC 0.656). There was strong agreement between results from first- and second-generation HR-pQCT (ICC >0.833). Conclusions The SPECTRA consensus method combines unique strengths of three independently-developed algorithms and leverages underlying software updates to provide a mature analysis to measure 3D JSW. This method is robust with respect to repositioning and scanner generations, suggesting its suitability for detecting change.

[1]  J. Goldhahn,et al.  Revealing the interplay of bone and cartilage in osteoarthritis through multimodal imaging of murine joints. , 2009, Bone.

[2]  A. Burghardt,et al.  The SPECTRA Collaboration OMERACT Special Interest Group: Current Research and Future Directions , 2017, The Journal of Rheumatology.

[3]  G. Schett,et al.  Definition for Rheumatoid Arthritis Erosions Imaged with High Resolution Peripheral Quantitative Computed Tomography and Interreader Reliability for Detection and Measurement , 2016, The Journal of Rheumatology.

[4]  B van Rietbergen,et al.  An automated algorithm for the detection of cortical interruptions on high resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography images of finger joints , 2017, PloS one.

[5]  K. Engelke,et al.  Automated three-dimensional registration of high-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography data to quantify size and shape changes of arthritic bone erosions. , 2015, Rheumatology.

[6]  E. Szabo,et al.  Reproducible metacarpal joint space width measurements using 3D analysis of images acquired with high-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography. , 2013, Medical engineering & physics.

[7]  Georg Schett,et al.  Bone erosion in rheumatoid arthritis: mechanisms, diagnosis and treatment , 2012, Nature Reviews Rheumatology.

[8]  P. Shekelle,et al.  How to read radiographs according to the Sharp/van der Heijde method. , 1999 .

[9]  J. Fleiss,et al.  Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability. , 1979, Psychological bulletin.

[10]  P. Geusens,et al.  The Reliability of a Semi-automated Algorithm for Detection of Cortical Interruptions in Finger Joints on High Resolution CT Compared to MicroCT , 2017, Calcified Tissue International.

[11]  P. Rüegsegger,et al.  A new method for the model‐independent assessment of thickness in three‐dimensional images , 1997 .

[12]  G. Steiner,et al.  Cartilage damage and bone erosion are more prominent determinants of functional impairment in longstanding experimental arthritis than synovial inflammation , 2016, Disease Models & Mechanisms.

[13]  Ralph Müller,et al.  Reproducibility of compartmental subchondral bone morphometry in the mouse tibiofemoral joint. , 2015, Bone.

[14]  R. Müller,et al.  Quantitative imaging of cartilage and bone for functional assessment of gene therapy approaches in experimental arthritis , 2010, Journal of tissue engineering and regenerative medicine.

[15]  A. Silman,et al.  Rheumatoid arthritis classifi cation criteria : an American College of Rheumatology / European League Against Rheumatism collaborative initiative , 2010 .

[16]  Thomas M. Link,et al.  Quantitative In Vivo HR-pQCT Imaging of 3D Wrist and Metacarpophalangeal Joint Space Width in Rheumatoid Arthritis , 2013, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[17]  L. Tian,et al.  Short-term changes on MRI predict long-term changes on radiography in rheumatoid arthritis: an analysis by an OMERACT Task Force of pooled data from four randomised controlled trials , 2016, Annals of the rheumatic diseases.

[18]  C. Barnabe,et al.  High-resolution Peripheral Quantitative Computed Tomography Imaging Protocol for Metacarpophalangeal Joints in Inflammatory Arthritis: The SPECTRA Collaboration , 2012, The Journal of Rheumatology.

[19]  C. Barnabe,et al.  High-resolution Peripheral Quantitative Computed Tomography Imaging in the Assessment of Periarticular Bone of Metacarpophalangeal and Wrist Joints , 2016, The Journal of Rheumatology.

[20]  M. Peters,et al.  An automated algorithm for the detection of cortical interruptions and its underlying loss of trabecular bone; a reproducibility study , 2018, BMC Medical Imaging.

[21]  A. Burghardt,et al.  Determining Metacarpophalangeal Flexion Angle Tolerance for Reliable Volumetric Joint Space Measurements by High-resolution Peripheral Quantitative Computed Tomography , 2016, The Journal of Rheumatology.

[22]  Ralph Müller,et al.  Automated compartmental analysis for high-throughput skeletal phenotyping in femora of genetic mouse models. , 2007, Bone.

[23]  M. Jergas,et al.  Accurate assessment of precision errors: How to measure the reproducibility of bone densitometry techniques , 2005, Osteoporosis International.

[24]  R. Müller,et al.  Three-Dimensional Quantitative Morphometric Analysis (QMA) for In Situ Joint and Tissue Assessment of Osteoarthritis in a Preclinical Rabbit Disease Model , 2016, PloS one.

[25]  P Rüegsegger,et al.  Comparison of structure extraction methods for in vivo trabecular bone measurements. , 1999, Computerized medical imaging and graphics : the official journal of the Computerized Medical Imaging Society.

[26]  Georg Schett,et al.  Segmentation and quantification of bone erosions in high-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography datasets of the metacarpophalangeal joints of patients with rheumatoid arthritis. , 2014, Rheumatology.