A Comparison of Lane Marking Detection Quality and View Range between Daytime and Night-Time Conditions by Machine Vision

Lateral support systems in vehicles have a high potential for reduction of lane departure crashes. To profit from their full potential, such systems should function properly in adverse conditions. Literature indicates that their accuracy varies between day and night-time. However, detailed quantifications of the systems’ performance in these conditions are rare. The aim of this study is to investigate the differences in detection quality and view range of Mobileye 630 in dry daytime and night-time conditions. On-road tests on four rural road sections in Croatia were conducted. Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used to test the difference between the number of quality rankings while absolute average, average difference and standard deviation were used to analyse the view range. Also, a paired samples t-test was used to test the difference between conditions for each line on each road. The overall results confirm that a significant difference in lane detection quality view range exists between tested conditions. “Medium” and “high” detection confidence (quality level 3 and 2), increased by 5% and 8% during night-time compared to daytime while level 0 (“nothing detected”) decreased by 12%. The view range increased (almost 16% for middle line) during daytime compared to night-time. The findings of this study expand the existing knowledge and are valuable for research and development of machine-vision systems but also for road authorities to optimize the markings’ quality performance.

[1]  Salvatore Cafiso,et al.  Decision Tree Method to Analyze the Performance of Lane Support Systems , 2021, Sustainability.

[2]  Kwangsuck Boo,et al.  A Study on Real-Time Detection Method of Lane and Vehicle for Lane Change Assistant System Using Vision System on Highway , 2018, Engineering Science and Technology, an International Journal.

[3]  Long Chen,et al.  Analysis of Roadway Traffic Accidents Based on Rough Sets and Bayesian Networks , 2018 .

[4]  Joseph E. Hummer,et al.  Pavement Marking Degradation Modeling and Analysis , 2009 .

[5]  Dario Babić,et al.  Determining the Correlation Between Daytime and Night-time Road Markings Visibility , 2016 .

[6]  Ronen Lerner,et al.  Recent progress in road and lane detection: a survey , 2012, Machine Vision and Applications.

[7]  Simon Sternlund The safety potential of lane departure warning systems—A descriptive real-world study of fatal lane departure passenger car crashes in Sweden , 2017, Traffic injury prevention.

[8]  Joseph E. Hummer,et al.  Linear Mixed-Effects Models for Paint Pavement-Marking Retroreflectivity Data , 2011 .

[9]  Anders Lie,et al.  The effectiveness of lane departure warning systems—A reduction in real-world passenger car injury crashes , 2017, Traffic injury prevention.

[10]  Dale M. Mull,et al.  Paint Pavement Marking Performance Prediction Model , 2012 .

[11]  Matthew Hudnall,et al.  Potential safety benefits of lane departure prevention technology , 2019, IATSS Research.

[12]  Ramji Makwana,et al.  Survey : Vision based Road Detection Techniques , 2014 .

[13]  Cassandra Isackson,et al.  Best Practices In Lane-Departure Avoidance and Traffic Calming , 2011 .

[14]  Darko Babić,et al.  Road Markings and Their Impact on Driver Behaviour and Road Safety: A Systematic Review of Current Findings , 2020 .

[15]  Denis Wolf,et al.  Road marking detection using LIDAR reflective intensity data and its application to vehicle localization , 2014, 17th International IEEE Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC).

[16]  Dario Babić,et al.  Model for Predicting Road Markings Service Life , 2019, The Baltic Journal of Road and Bridge Engineering.