Linguistic cognitive load : implications for automotive UIs

This position paper describes an approach to speech-driven user interfaces for automotive drivers. Drivers divide their attention between hands-free electronic devices and the necessity of driving safely. These devices are often controlled via spoken dialogue interfaces, which impose their own burden on driver attention. We argue for an approach that modulates the complexity of the user interface with ongoing driving conditions using psycholinguistic measures of language complexity, and we describe an overall system design in the context of research into language in divided-attention contexts. Our system design uses a given language complexity metric to calibrate the rate of syntactic and semantic information transfer between the driver and the synthetic speech interface in order to prioritise safe driving while permitting the driver to perform auxiliary tasks.

[1]  R. Levy Expectation-based syntactic comprehension , 2008, Cognition.

[2]  Stephen T. Wu,et al.  Complexity Metrics in an Incremental Right-Corner Parser , 2010, ACL.

[3]  Amy Weinberg,et al.  Crowdsourcing syntactic relatedness judgements for opinion mining in the study of information technology adoption , 2011, LaTeCH@ACL.

[4]  Ellen Campana,et al.  Monitoring eye movements as an evaluation of synthesized speech , 2002, Proceedings of 2002 IEEE Workshop on Speech Synthesis, 2002..

[5]  Stefan Frank,et al.  Uncertainty Reduction as a Measure of Cognitive Processing Effort , 2010, CMCL@ACL.

[6]  John Hale,et al.  A Probabilistic Earley Parser as a Psycholinguistic Model , 2001, NAACL.

[7]  Brian Roark,et al.  Deriving lexical and syntactic expectation-based measures for psycholinguistic modeling via incremental top-down parsing , 2009, EMNLP.

[8]  Joyce Yue Chai,et al.  Between linguistic attention and gaze fixations inmultimodal conversational interfaces , 2009, ICMI-MLMI '09.

[9]  Maria Klara Wolters,et al.  The user model-based summarize and refine approach improves information presentation in spoken dialog systems , 2011, Comput. Speech Lang..

[10]  Scott Weinstein,et al.  Centering: A Framework for Modeling the Local Coherence of Discourse , 1995, CL.

[11]  Frank Keller,et al.  A Computational Model of Prediction in Human Parsing: Unifying Locality and Surprisal Effects , 2009 .

[12]  Frank Keller,et al.  Syntactic and Semantic Factors in Processing Difficulty: An Integrated Measure , 2010, ACL.

[13]  Cristina Delogu,et al.  Cognitive factors in the evaluation of synthetic speech , 1998, Speech Commun..

[14]  Linguistic attention control: attention shifting governed by grammaticized elements of language. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[15]  Frank Keller,et al.  Data from eye-tracking corpora as evidence for theories of syntactic processing complexity , 2008, Cognition.

[16]  E. Gibson The dependency locality theory: A distance-based theory of linguistic complexity. , 2000 .

[17]  Johanna D. Moore,et al.  A Strategy for Information Presentation in Spoken Dialog Systems , 2011, CL.

[18]  Johanna D. Moore,et al.  Context & usability testing: user-modeled information presentation in easy and difficult driving conditions , 2007, CHI.

[19]  Marilyn A. Walker,et al.  Quantitative and Qualitative Evaluation of Darpa Communicator Spoken Dialogue Systems , 2001, ACL.

[20]  T. Jaeger,et al.  Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society , 2008 .