A comparative study of semantic change in grammaticalization and lexicalization in Chinese and Germanic languages

This study explores the typological regularity of semantic change in grammaticalization and lexicalization in Chinese and Germanic languages. Earlier studies, mostly done on Indo-European languages (e.g. Heine et al. 1991, Traugott & Dasher 2002), suggest that semantic change follows the cline A>A, B>B. Based on numerous case studies of semantic change in grammaticalization and lexicalization in Chinese, this paper provides evidence that semantic change in Chinese follows a somewhat different pattern: A>A, B>A,B,C. The key factors responsible for this, as it will be argued, are twofold: Chinese grammar is typologically structured without inflections and Chinese words have become increasingly disyllabic. Indo-European languages, which exhibit quite different grammatical and morphological structures and diachronic evolution, therefore show a different tendency.

[1]  Barbara Meisterernst.  Tense and Aspect in Han Period Chinese: A Linguistic Analysis of the ‘Shijì’ , 2015 .

[2]  Clarie Thomas,et al.  Lexicalization in Generative Morphology and Conceptual Structure , 2013 .

[3]  Elke Diedrichsen.  What you give is what you GET? On reanalysis, semantic extension and functional motivation with the German bekommen-passive construction , 2012 .

[4]  Shoko Honda.  ON THE ORIGIN AND DEVELOPMENT OF THE GET-PASSIVE: WITH SPECIAL REFERENCE TO GRAMMATICALIZATION , 2012 .

[5]  Rochelle Lieber,et al.  On the lexical semantics of compounds: Non-affixal (de)verbal compounds , 2010 .

[6]  Irene Vogel,et al.  Cross-disciplinary issues in compounding , 2010 .

[7]  B. Joseph.  Morphologization from Syntax , 2008 .

[8]  Dieter Kastovsky,et al.  Typological Changes in Derivational Morphology , 2008 .

[9]  Walter Bisang,et al.  Precategoriality and syntax-based parts of speech: The case of Late Archaic Chinese , 2008 .

[10]  Elizabeth Closs Traugott,et al.  The concepts of constructional mismatch and type-shifting from the perspective of grammaticalization , 2007 .

[11]  Nicholas Fleisher,et al.  The origin of passive get , 2006, English Language and Linguistics.

[12]  Peter Hohenhaus,et al.  Lexicalization and Institutionalization , 2005 .

[13]  Rochelle Lieber,et al.  English Word-Formation Processes , 2005 .

[14]  Laura A. Michaelis.  Type shifting in construction grammar: An integrated approach to aspectual coercion* , 2004 .

[15]  Janet Zhiqun Xing.  Grammaticalization of the scalar focus particle lian 連 in Mandarin Chinese , 2004 .

[16]  Marianne Hundt,et al.  What corpora tell us about the grammaticalisation of voice in get-constructions , 2001 .

[17]  Gabriele Diewald,et al.  Die Modalverben im Deutschen. Grammatikalisierung und Polyfunktionalität , 1999 .

[18]  One-Soon Her,et al.  Historical development of ba and jiang in the Tang Dynasty , 1990, Language Variation and Change.

[19]  D. Kastovsky.  WORD-FORMATION: A FUNCTIONAL VIEW , 1982 .

[20]  P. Bennett,et al.  The Evolution of Passive and Disposal Sentences , 1981 .