Collaborative Construction of Task Activity: Coordinating Multiple Resources in a High School Physics Lab

This article documents the collaborative coordination of multiple resources-talk, gesture, and writing-as represented in the interaction among 3 high school seniors working on a physics laboratory task. Through the close analysis of the moment-to-moment construction of task, this study draws attention to complex yet taken-for-granted practices that are integral to thinking and acting in the ubiquitous context of laboratory activities. In line with other research on situated action, it is critical to our understanding of jointly implemented activities that we look closely at their forms on particular occasions. These students display forms of competence that can be manifested only in interaction. From this perspective, learning activities involve not only making conceptual connections but also, and crucially, making interactional connections, knowing how to collaboratively construct a task.

[1]  E. Schegloff.  Sequencing in Conversational Openings , 1968 .

[2]  E. Schegloff,et al.  Opening up Closings , 1973 .

[3]  E. Schegloff,et al.  A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation , 1974 .

[4]  H. Mehan.  Structuring School Structure , 1978 .

[5]  S. Levinson.  Activity types and language , 1979, Linguistics.

[6]  C. Goodwin.  Conversational Organization: Interaction Between Speakers and Hearers , 1981 .

[7]  E. Goffman,et al.  Forms of talk , 1982 .

[8]  S. Heath.  Ways with Words: Language, Life and Work in Communities and Classrooms , 1983 .

[9]  M. Schlossberg.  The Social Construction of Literacy. , 1987 .

[10]  Suzanne Scollon,et al.  The Social construction of literacy , 1986 .

[11]  M. Goodwin.  He-Said-She-Said: Talk As Social Organization Among Black Children , 1993 .

[12]  J. Lemke.  Talking Science: Language, Learning, and Values , 1990 .

[13]  Marjorie Harness Goodwin,et al.  Tactical Uses of Stories: Participation Frameworks within Girls' and Boys' Disputes. , 1990 .

[14]  Emanuel A. Schegloff,et al.  Conversation analysis and socially shared cognition , 1991, Perspectives on socially shared cognition.

[15]  Gene H. Lerner.  On the syntax of sentences-in-progress , 1991, Language in Society.

[16]  Steven E. Clayman,et al.  The Diversity of Ethnomethodology , 1991 .

[17]  Stephanie D. Teasley,et al.  Perspectives on socially shared cognition , 1991 .

[18]  B. Asher.  The Professional Vision , 1994 .

[19]  Kris D. Gutiérrez.  Unpackaging academic discourse , 1995 .

[20]  Charles Goodwin.  Interaction and grammar: Transparent vision , 1996 .

[21]  P. Healy,et al.  Learning the lessons. , 1996, Nursing standard (Royal College of Nursing (Great Britain) : 1987).

[22]  Sarah Michaels,et al.  Discourse, learning, and schooling: Shifting participant frameworks: orchestrating thinking practices in group discussion , 1996 .

[23]  Barbara A. Fox,et al.  Practices in the Construction of Turns: The "TCU" Revisited , 1996 .

[24]  M. Egbert.  Schisming: The Collaborative Transformation From a Single Conversation to Multiple Conversations , 1997 .

[25]  Anita M. Pomerantz,et al.  Conversation analysis: an approach to the study of social action as sense making practices , 1997 .

[26]  Margret Selting,et al.  InLiSt No . 4 Interaction and Linguistic Structures TCUs and TRPs : The Construction of Units in Conversational Talk * , 1998 .