Magnetosensory function in rats: Localization using positron emission tomography

The aim of this study was to show that low‐strength electromagnetic fields (EMFs) produced evoked potentials in rats and to localize the activated region in the brain. In response to a 2.5‐G, 60‐Hz stimulus, onset‐ and offset‐evoked potentials were detected (P < 0.05 in each of the 10 animals studied); the evoked potentials had the same magnitude, latency, and nonlinear relationship to the field seen in previous studies on rabbits and human subjects. The neuroanatomical region of activation associated with the electrophysiological effect was identified by positron emission tomography using fluorodeoxyglucose. Paired emission scans (the same animal with and without field treatment) from 10 additional rats were differenced and averaged to produce a t‐statistic image using the pooled variance; the t value of each voxel was compared with a calculated critical t value to identify the activated voxels (P < 0.05). A brain volume of 13 mm3 (15 voxels) located in the posterior, central cerebellum was found to have been activated by exposure to the field. Taken together, the results indicated that magnetosensory evoked potentials in the rats were associated with increased glucose utilization in the cerebellum, thereby supporting earlier evidence that EMF transduction occurred in the brain. Synapse 63:421–428, 2009. © 2009 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

[1]  Andrew A. Marino,et al.  SENSORY TRANSDUCTION AS A PROPOSED MODEL FOR BIOLOGICAL DETECTION OF ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELDS , 2001 .

[2]  Kimitaka Kaga,et al.  Cortical mapping of auditory-evoked offset responses in rats , 2004, Neuroreport.

[3]  James W. Hall,et al.  Human offset auditory brainstem response: effects of stimulus acoustic ringing and rise-fall time , 1997, Hearing Research.

[4]  A. Boyles,et al.  National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences , 2008 .

[5]  Maria Blettner,et al.  Occupational exposure to radio frequency/microwave radiation and the risk of brain tumors: Interphone Study Group, Germany. , 2006, American journal of epidemiology.

[6]  D. Henshaw,et al.  Aggregating Disparate Epidemiological Evidence: Comparing Two Seminal EMF Reviews , 2008, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[7]  Jurgen Seidel,et al.  Measurement of cerebral glucose metabolic rates in the anesthetized rat by dynamic scanning with 18F-FDG, the ATLAS small animal PET scanner, and arterial blood sampling. , 2004, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[8]  P. Villeneuve,et al.  Brain cancer and occupational exposure to magnetic fields among men: results from a Canadian population-based case-control study. , 2002, International journal of epidemiology.

[9]  F. Varela,et al.  Guiding the study of brain dynamics by using first-person data: Synchrony patterns correlate with ongoing conscious states during a simple visual task , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[10]  Jufang He OFF responses in the auditory thalamus of the guinea pig. , 2002, Journal of neurophysiology.

[11]  Domenico Restuccia,et al.  Cerebellar damage impairs detection of somatosensory input changes. A somatosensory mismatch-negativity study. , 2006, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[12]  Jesper L. R. Andersson,et al.  A template for spatial normalisation of MR images of the rat brain , 2003, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[13]  Angela R Laird,et al.  Cerebellum and auditory function: An ALE meta‐analysis of functional neuroimaging studies , 2005, Human brain mapping.

[14]  D. Ruelle,et al.  Recurrence Plots of Dynamical Systems , 1987 .

[15]  Alan C. Evans,et al.  A Three-Dimensional Statistical Analysis for CBF Activation Studies in Human Brain , 1992, Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism.

[16]  D. Mcpherson Late Potentials of the Auditory System , 1995 .

[17]  Geraint Rees,et al.  Different Brain Circuits Underlie Motor and Perceptual Representations of Temporal Intervals , 2008, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[18]  Charles L. Webber,et al.  Magnetosensory evoked potentials: Consistent nonlinear phenomena , 2008, Neuroscience Research.

[19]  Clifton Frilot,et al.  Localization of electroreceptive function in rabbits , 2003, Physiology & Behavior.

[20]  Andrew A. Marino,et al.  Evidence of a nonlinear human magnetic sense , 2007, Neuroscience.

[21]  Andrew Chesson,et al.  Detection of nonlinear event-related potentials , 2006, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[22]  Andreas A Ioannides,et al.  Imaging cerebellum activity in real time with magnetoencephalographic data. , 2005, Progress in brain research.

[23]  W. Willis,et al.  The cerebellum: organization, functions and its role in nociception , 2003, Brain Research Reviews.

[24]  Clifton Frilot,et al.  Consistent magnetic-field induced dynamical changes in rabbit brain activity detected by recurrence quantification analysis☆ , 2003, Brain Research.