A process-based metacommunity framework linking local and regional scale community ecology

The metacommunity concept has the potential to integrate local and regional dynamics within a general community ecology framework. To this end, the concept must move beyond the discrete archetypes that have largely defined it (e.g. neutral vs. species sorting) and better incorporate local scale species interactions and coexistence mechanisms. Here, we present a fundamental reconception of the framework that explicitly links local coexistence theory to the spatial processes inherent to metacommunity theory, allowing for a continuous range of competitive community dynamics. These dynamics emerge from the three underlying processes that shape ecological communities: 1) density-independent responses to abiotic conditions, 2) density-dependent biotic interactions, and 3) dispersal. Stochasticity is incorporated in the demographic realization of each of these processes. We formalize this framework using a simulation model that explores a wide range of competitive metacommunity dynamics by varying the strength of the underlying processes. Using this model and framework, we show how existing theories, including the traditional metacommunity archetypes, are linked by this common set of processes. We then use the model to generate new hypotheses about how the three processes combine to interactively shape diversity, functioning, and stability within metacommunities. Statement of authorship This project was conceived at the sTURN working group, of which all authors are members. PLT developed the framework and model with input from all authors. PLT wrote the model code. PLT and LMG performed the simulations. PLT produced the figures and wrote the first draft with input from LMG and JMC. All authors provided feedback and edits on several versions of the manuscript. Data accessibility All code for running the simulation model and producing the figures is archived on Zenodo - https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3833035.

[1]  Robert D. Holt,et al.  Food webs in space: On the interplay of dynamic instability and spatial processes , 2002, Ecological Research.

[2]  Oscar Godoy,et al.  Phenology effects on invasion success: insights from coupling field experiments to coexistence theory. , 2014, Ecology.

[3]  Nerea Abrego,et al.  What can observational data reveal about metacommunity processes? , 2019, Ecography.

[4]  Graham Bell,et al.  The Distribution of Abundance in Neutral Communities , 2000, The American Naturalist.

[5]  R. Levins,et al.  Regional Coexistence of Species and Competition between Rare Species. , 1971, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[6]  T. Barraclough,et al.  Biodiversity inhibits species' evolutionary responses to changing environments. , 2008, Ecology letters.

[7]  Helmut Hillebrand,et al.  Empirical approaches to metacommunities: a review and comparison with theory. , 2011, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[8]  Anthony R. Ives,et al.  Food-web interactions govern the resistance of communities after non-random extinctions , 2004, Nature.

[9]  T. Fukami,et al.  Applying modern coexistence theory to priority effects , 2019, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[10]  M. Loreau,et al.  Biodiversity as spatial insurance: the effects of habitat fragmentation and dispersal on ecosystem functioning , 2009 .

[11]  A. Hendry,et al.  Eco-evolutionary dynamics , 2016, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[12]  J. Lawton,et al.  Making mistakes when predicting shifts in species range in response to global warming , 1998, Nature.

[13]  Cyrille Violle,et al.  The return of the variance: intraspecific variability in community ecology. , 2012, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[14]  D. Tilman THE ECOLOGICAL CONSEQUENCES OF CHANGES IN BIODIVERSITY: A SEARCH FOR GENERAL PRINCIPLES101 , 1999 .

[15]  Andrew Gonzalez,et al.  Dispersal governs the reorganization of ecological networks under environmental change , 2017, Nature Ecology &Evolution.

[16]  James Rosindell,et al.  Unified neutral theory of biodiversity and biogeography , 2010, Scholarpedia.

[17]  Patrick L. Thompson,et al.  Loss of habitat and connectivity erodes species diversity, ecosystem functioning, and stability in metacommunity networks , 2017 .

[18]  Coexistence theory and the frequency-dependence of priority effects , 2018, Nature Ecology & Evolution.

[19]  A. J. Lotka Contribution to the Energetics of Evolution. , 1922, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[20]  Emanuel A. Fronhofer,et al.  The conflict between adaptation and dispersal for maintaining biodiversity in changing environments , 2018, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[21]  M. C. Urban,et al.  Community monopolization: local adaptation enhances priority effects in an evolving metacommunity , 2009, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[22]  Jim M Cushing,et al.  Some Discrete Competition Models and the Competitive Exclusion Principle† , 2004 .

[23]  L. Meester,et al.  Community assembly is a race between immigration and adaptation: eco-evolutionary interactions across spatial scales , 2016 .

[24]  Emanuel A. Fronhofer,et al.  Information use shapes the dynamics of range expansions into environmental gradients , 2017 .

[25]  Mark Vellend,et al.  Conceptual Synthesis in Community Ecology , 2010, The Quarterly Review of Biology.

[26]  M. Leibold,et al.  Regional neutrality evolves through local adaptive niche evolution , 2018, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[27]  Joan M. Meiners,et al.  Competition and coexistence in plant communities: intraspecific competition is stronger than interspecific competition. , 2018, Ecology letters.

[28]  B. Gilbert,et al.  The ‘filtering’ metaphor revisited: competition and environment jointly structure invasibility and coexistence , 2018, bioRxiv.

[29]  M. Loreau,et al.  Biodiversity as spatial insurance in heterogeneous landscapes , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[30]  Jonathan M. Chase,et al.  Biodiversity and ecosystem functioning at local and regional spatial scales , 2002 .

[31]  Peter B Adler,et al.  A niche for neutrality. , 2007, Ecology letters.

[32]  N. Loeuille,et al.  Evolution in Metacommunities: On the Relative Importance of Species Sorting and Monopolization in Structuring Communities , 2008, The American Naturalist.

[33]  Michel Loreau,et al.  Community Patterns in Source‐Sink Metacommunities , 2003, The American Naturalist.

[34]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[35]  Patrick L. Thompson,et al.  Towards a multi-trophic extension of metacommunity ecology. , 2018, Ecology letters.

[36]  Patrick L. Thompson,et al.  Ecosystem multifunctionality in metacommunities. , 2016, Ecology.

[37]  D. McShea,et al.  Biology's First Law: The Tendency for Diversity and Complexity to Increase in Evolutionary Systems , 2010 .

[38]  Andrew Gonzalez,et al.  The functional role of producer diversity in ecosystems. , 2011, American journal of botany.

[39]  J. Timothy Wootton,et al.  THEORETICAL CONCEPTS AND EMPIRICAL APPROACHES TO MEASURING INTERACTION STRENGTH , 1998 .

[40]  Stefano Allesina,et al.  The Effect of Intra- and Interspecific Competition on Coexistence in Multispecies Communities , 2016, The American Naturalist.

[41]  Dominique Gravel,et al.  Reconciling niche and neutrality: the continuum hypothesis. , 2006, Ecology letters.

[42]  J. HilleRisLambers,et al.  Distinct responses of niche and fitness differences to water availability underlie variable coexistence outcomes in semi‐arid annual plant communities , 2018, Journal of Ecology.

[43]  Dominique Gravel,et al.  Trophic theory of island biogeography. , 2011, Ecology letters.

[44]  Jonathan M. Chase,et al.  The metacommunity concept: a framework for multi-scale community ecology , 2004 .

[45]  G. F. Gause Experimental Studies on the Struggle for Existence: I. Mixed Population of Two Species of Yeast , 1932 .

[46]  J. C. de Almeida,et al.  Concluding Remarks , 2015, Clinical practice and epidemiology in mental health : CP & EMH.

[47]  P. Chesson General theory of competitive coexistence in spatially-varying environments. , 2000, Theoretical population biology.

[48]  D. Tilman Resource competition and community structure. , 1983, Monographs in population biology.

[49]  Charles C. Elton Animal Ecology , 1927, Nature.

[50]  R. Holt Population dynamics in two-patch environments: Some anomalous consequences of an optimal habitat distribution , 1985 .

[51]  C. S. Holling The components of prédation as revealed by a study of small-mammal prédation of the European pine sawfly. , 1959 .

[52]  Michel Loreau,et al.  Partitioning selection and complementarity in biodiversity experiments , 2001, Nature.

[53]  Serguei Saavedra,et al.  A structural approach for understanding multispecies coexistence , 2017 .

[54]  T. Fukami,et al.  A framework for priority effects , 2016 .

[55]  J. Grinnell The Niche-Relationships of the California Thrasher , 1917 .

[56]  S. Schreiber,et al.  Why intraspecific trait variation matters in community ecology. , 2011, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[57]  B. Gilbert,et al.  Dispersal and diversity in experimental metacommunities: linking theory and practice , 2016 .

[58]  J. Lawton Are there general laws in ecology , 1999 .

[59]  Andreas Huth,et al.  Integrating the underlying structure of stochasticity into community ecology , 2019, Ecology.

[60]  David M. Richardson,et al.  Biodiversity and Ecosystem Functioning , 2014 .

[61]  Alan Edelman,et al.  Julia: A Fresh Approach to Numerical Computing , 2014, SIAM Rev..

[62]  M. Scheffer,et al.  Superorganisms or loose collections of species? A unifying theory of community patterns along environmental gradients. , 2019, Ecology letters.

[63]  S. Langenheder,et al.  The legacy of the past : effects of historical processes on microbial metacommunities , 2017 .

[64]  Jonathan M. Chase,et al.  Alternative stable states and regional community structure. , 2004, Journal of theoretical biology.

[65]  M. Leibold,et al.  An integrative framework of coexistence mechanisms in competitive metacommunities , 2017 .

[66]  P. Chesson Mechanisms of Maintenance of Species Diversity , 2000 .

[67]  P. Verhulst Notice sur la loi que la population pursuit dans son accroissement , 1838 .

[68]  A. Hastings Disturbance, coexistence, history, and competition for space , 1980 .

[69]  Eric R Sokol,et al.  Making sense of metacommunities: dispelling the mythology of a metacommunity typology , 2016, Oecologia.

[70]  Jonathan M. Chase,et al.  Community assembly and the functioning of ecosystems: how metacommunity processes alter ecosystems attributes. , 2017, Ecology.

[71]  R. Beverton,et al.  On the dynamics of exploited fish populations , 1993, Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries.

[72]  Lauren G. Shoemaker,et al.  Linking metacommunity paradigms to spatial coexistence mechanisms. , 2016, Ecology.

[73]  Peter Chesson,et al.  How the Spatial Scales of Dispersal, Competition, and Environmental Heterogeneity Interact to Affect Coexistence , 2004, The American Naturalist.

[74]  V. Volterra Fluctuations in the Abundance of a Species considered Mathematically , 1926, Nature.

[75]  G. Niemi,et al.  Community Ecology , 2013 .

[76]  D. Tilman Competition and Biodiversity in Spatially Structured Habitats , 1994 .

[77]  Tadashi Fukami,et al.  Linking modern coexistence theory and contemporary niche theory , 2017 .

[78]  D. Post,et al.  The ecological importance of intraspecific variation , 2017, Nature Ecology & Evolution.

[79]  Jonathan M. Chase,et al.  Dispersal stochasticity mediates species richness in source–sink metacommunities , 2013 .

[80]  Marie-Pierre L. Gauthier,et al.  Priority effects can persist across floral generations in nectar microbial metacommunities , 2018 .

[81]  U. Dieckmann,et al.  Biodiversity, productivity, and the spatial insurance hypothesis revisited. , 2015, Journal of theoretical biology.

[82]  Jonathan M. Levine,et al.  Novel competitors shape species’ responses to climate change , 2015, Nature.