Effects beyond click-through: Incidental exposure to web advertising

While Web advertising tends to be based on a direct response model, there is a growing debate about the brand building potentials of Web ads. Click-through rates (CTR) are disappointingly low, but Web ads can be effective at brand building in an environment where Web ads are outside of consumers' attentional focus. With this in mind we conducted two experiments. The first experiment examined the effects of incidental exposure to banner ads. Subjects who were incidentally exposed to banner ads reported greater priming effects induced by implicit memory, more favorable Aad, and greater likelihood for the advertised brand to be included in a consideration set over no exposure to the ad. These effects were found without significant improvement on explicit memories (i.e. recall and recognition) and click-through intention. The second experiment to assess the conditions conducive to incidental exposure examined two advertising strategies: format (animated vs. static) and placement (congruency vs. incongruency). Findings suggest that the level of congruency between an advertised product and Webpage content play significant roles in affecting consumers' responses to incidentally exposed banner ads. This paper examines the results of these two experiments before discussing the implications for the role of Web ads on brand building and directions for future research.

[1]  Chris Janiszewski,et al.  The Influence of Print Advertisement Organization on Affect Toward a Brand Name , 1990 .

[2]  N. Brody,et al.  Affective discrimination of stimuli that are not recognized: II. Effect of delay between study and test , 1983 .

[3]  Chang-Hoan Cho,et al.  WHY DO PEOPLE AVOID ADVERTISING ON THE INTERNET? , 2004 .

[4]  Julie M. Pharr A Research Agenda for Brand-Building on the Internet with Banner Advertising , 2004 .

[5]  S. Rose Selective attention , 1992, Nature.

[6]  John Roberts,et al.  Development and Testing of a Model of Consideration Set Composition , 1991 .

[7]  E Tulving,et al.  Priming and human memory systems. , 1990, Science.

[8]  Robert A. Bjork,et al.  Measures of Memory , 1988 .

[9]  R. Zajonc Feeling and thinking : Preferences need no inferences , 1980 .

[10]  David W. Stewart,et al.  Effective television advertising : a study of 1000 commercials , 1987 .

[11]  Thomas L. Parkinson An Information Processing Approach to Evoked Set Formation , 1979 .

[12]  Stewart Shapiro,et al.  When an Ad's Influence Is beyond Our Conscious Control: Perceptual and Conceptual Fluency Effects Caused by Incidental Ad Exposure , 1999 .

[13]  John Eighmey Profiling user responses to commercial web sites , 1997 .

[14]  Charles R. Duke,et al.  Applying Implicit Memory Measures: Word Fragment Completion in Advertising Tests , 1994 .

[15]  N. Moray Attention in Dichotic Listening: Affective Cues and the Influence of Instructions , 1959 .

[16]  Dipankar Chakravarti,et al.  Memory Measures for Pretesting Advertisements: An Integrative Conceptual Framework and a Diagnostic Template , 1999 .

[17]  C. Yoo Implicit Memory Measures for Web Advertising Effectiveness , 2007 .

[18]  C. Whan Park,et al.  Viewer Processing of Commercial Messages: Context and Involvement , 1985 .

[19]  L. Jacoby A process dissociation framework: Separating automatic from intentional uses of memory , 1991 .

[20]  C. Russell Investigating the Effectiveness of Product Placements in Television Shows: The Role of Modality and Plot Connection Congruence on Brand Memory and Attitude , 2002 .

[21]  K. Grunert Automatic and Strategic Processes in Advertising Effects , 1996 .

[22]  D. Roskos-Ewoldsen,et al.  The Effectiveness of Brand Placements in the Movies: Levels of Placements, Explicit and Implicit Memory, and Brand-Choice Behavior , 2007 .

[23]  G. Kalyanaram,et al.  Brand Retrieval, Consideration Set Composition, Consumer Choice, and the Pioneering Advantage , 1993 .

[24]  N. Hollis,et al.  Advertising on the Web: is there response before click-through? , 1997 .

[25]  B. W. Whittlesea Illusions of familiarity. , 1993 .

[26]  D. MacInnis,et al.  The Effects of Incidental Ad Exposure on the Formation of Consideration Sets , 1997 .

[27]  Qimei Chen,et al.  Attitude Toward the Site , 1999 .

[28]  Chris Janiszewski,et al.  The Influence of Nonattended Material on the Processing of Advertising Claims , 1990 .

[29]  A. Treisman Contextual Cues in Selective Listening , 1960 .

[30]  Bernard J. Jaworski,et al.  Information Processing from Advertisements: Toward an Integrative Framework , 1989 .

[31]  Scott B. MacKenzie,et al.  An Empirical Examination of the Structural Antecedents of Attitude toward the Ad in an Advertising Pretesting Context , 1989 .

[32]  Annie Lang,et al.  Defining Audio/Video Redundancy From a Limited- Capacity Information Processing Perspective , 1995 .

[33]  FANGFANG DIAO,et al.  Orienting Response and Memory for Web Advertisements: , 2004, Commun. Res..

[34]  Scott B. MacKenzie,et al.  The Role of Attitude toward the Ad as a Mediator of Advertising Effectiveness: A Test of Competing Explanations: , 1986 .

[35]  Carl Obermiller,et al.  Varieties of Mere Exposure: The Effects of Processing Style and Repetition on Affective Response , 1985 .

[36]  J. P. Benway,et al.  Banner Blindness: Web Searchers Often Miss "Obvious" Links , 1998 .

[37]  L. Jacoby,et al.  On the relationship between autobiographical memory and perceptual learning. , 1981, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[38]  Stewart Shapiro,et al.  Memory-Based Measures for Assessing Advertising Effects: A Comparison of Explicit and Implicit Memory Effects , 2001 .

[39]  Chris Janiszewski Preattentive Mere Exposure Effects , 1993 .

[40]  Daniel L. Schacter,et al.  Priming effects in word-fragment completion are independent of recognition memory. , 1982 .

[41]  Claire Allison Stammerjohan,et al.  BANNER ADVERTISER-WEB SITE CONTEXT CONGRUITY AND COLOR EFFECTS ON ATTENTION AND ATTITUDES , 2005 .

[42]  P. Nedungadi Recall and Consumer Consideration Sets: Influencing Choice without Altering Brand Evaluations , 1990 .

[43]  R. Bornstein Exposure and affect: Overview and meta-analysis of research, 1968–1987. , 1989 .

[44]  John G. Seamon,et al.  Affective discrimination of stimuli that are not recognized: effects of shadowing, masking, and cerebral laterality , 1983 .

[45]  R. Kronauer,et al.  Affective Discrimination of Stimuli That Cannot Be Recognized , 2022 .

[46]  Jill H. Ellsworth,et al.  Marketing on the Internet: Multimedia Strategies for the World Wide Web , 1995 .

[47]  Allan D. Shocker,et al.  Consideration set influences on consumer decision-making and choice: Issues, models, and suggestions , 1991 .

[48]  Gilbert A. Churchill,et al.  Recognition versus Recall as Measures of Television Commercial Forgetting , 1988 .

[49]  Hairong Li,et al.  Cognitive Impact of Banner Ad Characteristics: An Experimental Study , 1999 .

[50]  Chang-Hoan Cho,et al.  Factors Influencing Clicking of Banner Ads on the WWW , 2003, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[51]  N. Hollis Ten Years of Learning on How Online Advertising Builds Brands , 2005, Journal of Advertising Research.

[52]  H. E. Krugman THE IMPACT OF TELEVISION ADVERTISING: LEARNING WITHOUT INVOLVEMENT , 1965 .

[53]  Z. Dienes,et al.  The relationship between implicit memory and implicit learning , 1991 .

[54]  Sriram Kalyanaraman,et al.  AROUSAL, MEMORY, AND IMPRESSION-FORMATION EFFECTS OF ANIMATION SPEED IN WEB ADVERTISING , 2004 .

[55]  Guy W. Mullarkey,et al.  Factors Affecting Online Advertising Recall: A Study of Students , 2003, Journal of Advertising Research.

[56]  A. Sharma,et al.  Recall of Television Commercials as a Function of Viewing Context: The Impact of Program-Commercial Congruity on Commercial Messages , 2000, The Journal of general psychology.