Evaluation of Handheld Scanners for Automotive Applications

The process of generating a computerized geometric model for an existing part is known as Reverse Engineering (RE). It is a very useful technique in product development and plays a significant role in automotive, aerospace, and medical industries. In fact, it has been getting remarkable attention in manufacturing industries owing to its advanced data acquisition technologies. The process of RE is based on two primary steps: data acquisition (also known as scanning) and data processing. To facilitate point data acquisition, a variety of scanning systems is available with different capabilities and limitations. Although the optical control of 3D scanners is fully developed, still several factors can affect the quality of the scanned data. As a result, the proper selection of scanning parameters, such as resolution, laser power, shutter time, etc., becomes very crucial. This kind of investigation can be very helpful and provide its users with guidelines to identify the appropriate factors. Moreover, it is worth noting that no single system is ideal in all applications. Accordingly, this work has compared two portable (handheld) systems based on laser scanning and white light optical scanning for automotive applications. A car door containing a free-form surface has been used to achieve the above-mentioned goal. The design of experiments has been employed to determine the effects of different scanning parameters and optimize them. The capabilities and limitations have been identified by comparing the two scanners in terms of accuracy, scanning time, triangle numbers, ease of use, and portability. Then, the relationships between the system capabilities and the application requirements have been established. The results revealed that the laser scanner performed better than the white light scanner in terms of accuracy, while the white light scanner performed better in terms of acquisition speed and triangle numbers.

[1]  Alexander Duss,et al.  Development capability profiles of selected reverse engineering techniques , 2012 .

[2]  Jozef Živčák,et al.  A Comparison of the Outputs of 3D Scanners , 2014 .

[3]  Qingjin Peng,et al.  3D DIGITIZING TECHNOLOGY IN PRODUCT REVERSE DESIGN , 2011 .

[4]  P. Minetola,et al.  A customer oriented methodology for reverse engineering software selection in the computer aided inspection scenario , 2015, Comput. Ind..

[5]  Nuno Ricardo Costa,et al.  Desirability function approach: A review and performance evaluation in adverse conditions , 2011 .

[6]  Kiran Jude Fernandes,et al.  Reverse Engineering: An Industrial Perspective , 2007 .

[7]  Paolo Minetola,et al.  Proposal of an innovative benchmark for comparison of the performance of contactless digitizers , 2010 .

[8]  Luigi Barazzetti,et al.  Photogrammetric techniques for monitoring tunnel deformation , 2014, Earth Science Informatics.

[9]  Salvatore Gerbino,et al.  On the influence of scanning factors on the laser scanner-based 3D inspection process , 2016 .

[10]  Abdulrahman Al-Ahmari,et al.  Optimizing parameters of freeform surface reconstruction using CMM , 2015 .

[11]  Suchada Rianmora,et al.  Alternative Optical Acquisition Technique for Supporting Reverse Engineering Process , 2017 .

[12]  B. J. Alvarez,et al.  Methodology for comparison of laser digitizing versus contact systems in dimensional control , 2010 .

[13]  Lihui Wang,et al.  Review: Advances in 3D data acquisition and processing for industrial applications , 2010 .

[14]  Massimo Martorelli,et al.  Dynamic spinnaker performance through digital photogrammetry, numerical analysis and experimental tests , 2017 .

[15]  Abdulrahman Al-Ahmari,et al.  Accuracy of a reverse-engineered mould using contact and non-contact measurement techniques , 2015, Int. J. Comput. Integr. Manuf..

[16]  Pasquale Memmolo,et al.  Combining ESPI with laser scanning for 3D characterization of racing tyres sections , 2017 .

[17]  Ralph R. Martin,et al.  Reverse engineering of geometric models - an introduction , 1997, Comput. Aided Des..

[18]  Basilio Ramos Barbero,et al.  Comparative study of different digitization techniques and their accuracy , 2011, Comput. Aided Des..

[19]  Ligang Liu,et al.  Scanning 3D Full Human Bodies Using Kinects , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.

[20]  Abdil Kus,et al.  Implementation of 3D Optical Scanning Technology for Automotive Applications , 2009, Sensors.