Decision development in small groups II: A study of multiple sequences in decision making 1

Poole's recent study of group decision‐making processes rejected the traditional unitary sequence model of decision development in which all decision‐making groups are assumed to follow a uniform set sequence of phases. It supported a multiple sequence model, which assumed different groups may have different sequences of phases. This study attempts to build on Poole's findings by presenting a detailed analysis of multiple decision sequences in two sets of groups: student groups performing a ranking task and groups of physicians performing a program planning task. This research had three specific goals: (1) To develop and define a Multiple Sequence Descriptive System adapted to the ten groups studied and generalizable for future research; (2) To analyze developmental patterns in conflict interaction and in the evolution of ideas in the ten groups; and (3) To compare unitary sequence and multiple sequence descriptions of the same discussions, with the object of meshing the two models. Results of the study s...

[1]  Alan L. Sillars Attributions and communication in roommate conflicts , 1980 .

[2]  E. Witte Field Research on Complex Decision-Making Processes – The Phase Theorem , 1972 .

[3]  Jay Hall,et al.  The Effects of a Normative Intervention on Group Decision-Making Performance , 1970 .

[4]  N. Maier Assets and liabilities in group problem solving: the need for an integrative function. , 1967, Psychological review.

[5]  Ernest G. Bormann,et al.  The paradox and promise of small group research , 1970 .

[6]  B. Tuckman DEVELOPMENTAL SEQUENCE IN SMALL GROUPS. , 1965, Psychological bulletin.

[7]  U. Segal,et al.  The Cyclical Nature of Decision Making , 1982 .

[8]  Thomas J. Knutson An experimental study of the effects of orientation behavior on small group consensus , 1972 .

[9]  S Toulmin,et al.  Logic and the theory of mind. , 1975, Nebraska Symposium on Motivation. Nebraska Symposium on Motivation.

[10]  O. Holsti Content Analysis for the Social Sciences and Humanities , 1969 .

[11]  K. Weick The social psychology of organizing , 1969 .

[12]  Marshall Scott Poole,et al.  A test of four models of decision development in small groups , 1980 .

[13]  Marshall Scott Poole,et al.  Decision development in small groups I: A comparison of two models , 1981 .

[14]  B. Aubrey Fisher,et al.  Small Group Decision Making , 1980 .

[15]  Randy Hirokawa GROUP COMMUNICATION AND PROBLEM-SOLVING EFFECTIVENESS: AN INVESTIGATION OF GROUP PHASES , 1983 .

[16]  Harold R. Dickman,et al.  The Perception of Behavioral Units. , 1963 .

[17]  Marshall Scott Poole,et al.  A METHOD FOR ESTABLISHING THE REPRESENTATIONAL VALIDITY OF INTERACTION CODING SYSTEMS: DO WE SEE WHAT THEY SEE? , 1981 .

[18]  R. Bales,et al.  Phases in group problem-solving. , 1951, Journal of abnormal and social psychology.

[19]  Edward A. Mabry,et al.  EXPLORATORY ANALYSIS OF A DEVELOPMENTAL MODEL FOR TASK‐ORIENTED SMALL GROUPS , 1975 .

[20]  Jacob Cohen Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences , 1969, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[21]  B. Fisher,et al.  Decision emergence: Phases in group decision‐making , 1970 .

[22]  I. Janis Victims Of Groupthink , 1972 .

[23]  Henry Mintzberg,et al.  The Structure of "Unstructured" Decision Processes , 1976 .