The Future of Human Evolution

Evolutionary development is sometimes thought of as exhibiting an inexorable trend towards higher, more complex, and normatively worthwhile forms of life. This paper explores some dystopian scenarios where freewheeling evolutionary developments, while continuing to produce complex and intelligent forms of organization, lead to the gradual elimination of all forms of being that we care about. We then consider how such catastrophic outcomes could be avoided and argue that under certain conditions the only possible remedy would be a globally coordinated policy to control human evolution by modifying the fitness function of future intelligent life forms. 1. The Panglossian view Can we trust evolutionary development to take our species in broadly desirable directions? Starting from primitive, unconscious life, biological evolution has led to the development of ever more advanced organisms, including creatures that have minds, consciousness, language, and reason. More recently, cultural and technological development, which exhibit some parallels with biological evolution, have enabled our species to progress at a vastly accelerated pace. The past few hundred years have seen enormous improvements in human life‐span, labor productivity, scientific knowledge, and social and political organization, which have enabled billions of people to enjoy unprecedented opportunities for enjoyment and personal development. On a historical as well as on a geological timescale, the big picture shows an overarching trend towards increasing levels of complexity, knowledge, 1

[1]  J. Eaton,et al.  The social biology of very high fertility among the Hutterites; the demography of a unique population. , 1953, Human biology.

[2]  B. Carter The anthropic principle and its implications for biological evolution , 1983, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A, Mathematical and Physical Sciences.

[3]  A. Baier,et al.  Reasons and Persons , 1984 .

[4]  R. Clayton What Sort of People Should There Be? , 1986 .

[5]  K. Eric Drexler,et al.  Engines of Creation: the Coming Era of Nanotechnology , 1986 .

[6]  S. Gould Wonderful Life: The Burgess Shale and the Nature of History , 1989 .

[7]  G. Reeke Marvin Minsky, The Society of Mind , 1991, Artif. Intell..

[8]  B. Carter The anthropic selection principle and the ultra-Darwinian synthesis. , 1993 .

[9]  Amots Zehavi,et al.  The Handicap Principle: A Missing Piece of Darwin's Puzzle , 1997 .

[10]  Stephen F. Haller The end of the world: The science and ethics of human extinction , 1997 .

[11]  R. Hanson Must Early Life Be Easy? The Rhythm of Major Evolutionary Transitions , 1998 .

[12]  Hans P. Moravec Robot: Mere Machine to Transcendent Mind , 1998 .

[13]  R. Frank Luxury fever : money and happiness in an era of excess , 1999 .

[14]  R. Hanson Burning the Cosmic Commons : Evolutionary Strategies for Interstellar Colonization , 1999 .

[15]  R. Wright Nonzero: The Logic of Human Destiny , 1999 .

[16]  G. Miller The Mating Mind: How Sexual Choice Shaped the Evolution of Human Nature , 2000 .

[17]  T. Malthus Essay on the Principle of Population , 2001 .

[18]  Debby E. Doughty,et al.  Genetic Influence Helps Explain Variation in Human Fertility: Evidence From Recent Behavioral and Molecular Genetic Studies , 2001 .

[19]  I. Owens,et al.  NATURAL SELECTION AND QUANTITATIVE GENETICS OF LIFE-HISTORY TRAITS IN WESTERN WOMEN: A TWIN STUDY , 2001, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[20]  N. Bostrom Anthropic Bias: Observation Selection Effects in Science and Philosophy , 2002 .

[21]  N. Bostrom Existential risks: analyzing human extinction scenarios and related hazards , 2002 .

[22]  Martin J. Rees,et al.  Our final hour : a scientist's warning : how terror, error, and environmental disaster threaten humankind's future in this century-- on earth and beyond , 2003 .