Robustness of protein folding kinetics to surface hydrophobic substitutions

We use both combinatorial and site‐directed mutagenesis to explore the consequences of surface hydrophobic substitutions for the folding of two small single domain proteins, the src SH3 domain, and the IgG binding domain of Peptostreptococcal protein L. We find that in almost every case, destabilizing surface hydrophobic substitutions have much larger effects on the rate of unfolding than on the rate of folding, suggesting that nonnative hydrophobic interactions do not significantly interfere with the rate of core assembly.

[1]  L. Regan,et al.  Guidelines for protein design: the energetics of beta sheet side chain interactions. , 1995, Science.

[2]  R. Sauer,et al.  Tolerance of a protein to multiple polar‐to‐hydrophobic surface substitutions , 2008, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[3]  M. Hecht,et al.  Binary patterning of polar and nonpolar amino acids in the sequences and structures of native proteins , 1995, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[4]  P. Halling.  Proteins: Structures and molecular properties (2nd edition). by Thomas E. Creighton, W. H. Freeman, New York, 1992, xiii + 512 pp, price £22.95. ISBN 0‐7167‐7030‐X , 1995 .

[5]  David Baker,et al.  A phage display system for studying the sequence determinants of protein folding , 1995, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[6]  D. Baker,et al.  Functional rapidly folding proteins from simplified amino acid sequences , 1997, Nature Structural Biology.

[7]  D. Eisenberg,et al.  The hydrophobic moment detects periodicity in protein hydrophobicity. , 1984, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[8]  D Baker,et al.  Folding dynamics of the src SH3 domain. , 1997, Biochemistry.

[9]  L. Regan,et al.  Guidelines for Protein Design: The Energetics of β Sheet Side Chain Interactions , 1995, Science.

[10]  T. Creighton.  Proteins: Structures and Molecular Properties , 1986 .

[11]  T. Sosnick,et al.  Molecular collapse: The rate‐limiting step in two‐state cytochrome c folding , 1996, Proteins.

[12]  D. Yee,et al.  Principles of protein folding — A perspective from simple exact models , 1995, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[13]  D. Baker,et al.  Matching theory and experiment in protein folding. , 1999, Current opinion in structural biology.

[14]  D Baker,et al.  The single helix in protein L is largely disrupted at the rate-limiting step in folding. , 1998, Journal of molecular biology.

[15]  David Baker,et al.  Important role of hydrogen bonds in the structurally polarized transition state for folding of the src SH3 domain , 1998, Nature Structural &Molecular Biology.

[16]  D Baker,et al.  Kinetics of folding of the IgG binding domain of peptostreptococcal protein L. , 1997, Biochemistry.

[17]  Robert T. Sauer,et al.  Reverse hydrophobic effects relieved by amino-acid substitutions at a protein surface , 1990, Nature.

[18]  E. Alm,et al.  Prediction of protein-folding mechanisms from free-energy landscapes derived from native structures. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[19]  D Baker,et al.  The sequences of small proteins are not extensively optimized for rapid folding by natural selection. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[20]  J. Udgaonkar,et al.  Initial hydrophobic collapse in the folding of barstar , 1995, Nature.

[21]  D. Baker,et al.  Prediction of local structure in proteins using a library of sequence-structure motifs. , 1998, Journal of molecular biology.

[22]  D Baker,et al.  Contrasting roles for symmetrically disposed beta-turns in the folding of a small protein. , 1997, Journal of molecular biology.

[23]  Axel T. Brünger,et al.  Amino-acid substitutions in a surface turn modulate protein stability , 1996, Nature Structural Biology.