Multi-atlas Context Forests for Knee MR Image Segmentation

It is important, yet a challenging procedure, to segment bones and cartilages from knee MR images. In this paper, we propose multi-atlas context forests to first segment bones and then segment cartilages. Specifically, for both the bone and cartilage segmentations, we iteratively train sets of random forests, based on training atlas images, to classify the individual voxels. The random forests rely on 1 the appearance features directly computed from images and also 2 the context features associated with tentative segmentation results, generated by the previous layer of random forest in the iterative framework. To extract context features, multiple atlases with expert segmentation are first registered, with the tentative segmentation result of the subject under consideration. Then, the spatial priors of anatomical labels of registered atlases are computed and used to calculate context features of the subject. Note that these multi-atlas context features will be iteratively refined based on the updated tentative segmentation result of the subject. As better segmentation result leads to more accurate registration between multiple atlases and the subject, context features will become increasingly more useful for the training of subsequent random forests in the iterative framework. As validated by experiments on the SKI10 dataset, our proposed method can achieve high segmentation accuracy.

[1]  Ole Fogh Olsen,et al.  Segmenting Articular Cartilage Automatically Using a Voxel Classification Approach , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[2]  Hans-Peter Meinzer,et al.  Statistical shape models for 3D medical image segmentation: A review , 2009, Medical Image Anal..

[3]  Pina Marziliano,et al.  Automatic knee cartilage segmentation from multi-contrast MR images using support vector machine classification with spatial dependencies. , 2013, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[4]  Tom Vercauteren,et al.  Diffeomorphic demons: Efficient non-parametric image registration , 2009, NeuroImage.

[5]  P. Brooks,et al.  Improving musculoskeletal health: global issues. , 2012, Best practice & research. Clinical rheumatology.

[6]  Marc Niethammer,et al.  Automatic atlas-based three-label cartilage segmentation from MR knee images , 2014, 2012 IEEE Workshop on Mathematical Methods in Biomedical Image Analysis.

[7]  Marc Niethammer,et al.  Automatic three-label bone segmentation from knee MR images , 2010, 2010 IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging: From Nano to Macro.

[8]  Zhuowen Tu,et al.  Auto-Context and Its Application to High-Level Vision Tasks and 3D Brain Image Segmentation , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[9]  Stuart Crozier,et al.  Automatic Segmentation and Quantitative Analysis of the Articular Cartilages From Magnetic Resonance Images of the Knee , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[10]  F. Eckstein,et al.  Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of articular cartilage in knee osteoarthritis (OA): morphological assessment. , 2006, Osteoarthritis and cartilage.

[11]  Marc Niethammer,et al.  Automatic atlas-based three-label cartilage segmentation from MR knee images , 2012, MMBIA.

[12]  Leo Breiman,et al.  Random Forests , 2001, Machine Learning.

[13]  Yaozong Gao,et al.  LINKS: Learning-based multi-source IntegratioN frameworK for Segmentation of infant brain images , 2015, NeuroImage.