Resolution of front-back ambiguity in spatial hearing by listener and source movement.

Normally, the apparent position of a sound source corresponds closely to its actual position. However, in some experimental situations listeners make large errors, such as indicating that a source in the frontal hemifield appears to be in the rear hemifield, or vice versa. These front-back confusions are thought to be a result of the inherent ambiguity of the primary interaural difference cues, interaural time difference (ITD) in particular. A given ITD could have been produced by a sound source anywhere on the so-called "cone of confusion." More than 50 years ago Wallach [J. Exp. Psychol. 27, 339-368 (1940)] argued that small head movements could provide the information necessary to resolve the ambiguity. The direction of the change in ITD that accompanies a head rotation is an unambiguous indicator of the proper hemifield. The experiments reported here are a modern test of Wallach's hypothesis. Listeners indicated the apparent positions of real and virtual sound sources in conditions in which head movements were either restricted or encouraged. The front-back confusions made in the restricted condition nearly disappeared in the condition in which head movements were encouraged. In a second experiment head movements were restricted, but the sound source was moved, either by the experimenter or by the listener. Only when the listener moved the sound source did front-back confusions disappear. The results clearly support Wallach's hypothesis and suggest further that head movements are not required to produce the dynamic cues needed to resolve front-back ambiguity.

[1]  F L Wightman,et al.  Headphone simulation of free-field listening. I: Stimulus synthesis. , 1989, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[2]  I. Pollack,et al.  Effect of head movement on the localization of sounds in the equatorial plane , 1967 .

[3]  W Noble,et al.  The contribution of head motion cues to localization of low-pass noise , 1997, Perception & psychophysics.

[4]  F E Toole,et al.  In-head localization of acoustic images. , 1970, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[5]  A. Bronkhorst Localization of real and virtual sound sources , 1995 .

[6]  W R Thurlow,et al.  Effect of induced head movements on localization of direction of sounds. , 1967, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[7]  F. Wightman,et al.  The dominant role of low-frequency interaural time differences in sound localization. , 1992, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[8]  H. Wallach,et al.  The role of head movements and vestibular and visual cues in sound localization. , 1940 .

[9]  W. Hartmann,et al.  Localization of sound in rooms, II: The effects of a single reflecting surface. , 1985, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[10]  F L Wightman,et al.  Monaural sound localization revisited. , 1997, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[11]  J. C. Middlebrooks,et al.  Two-dimensional sound localization by human listeners. , 1990, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[12]  Elizabeth M. Wenzel,et al.  Localization in Virtual Acoustic Displays , 1992, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[13]  Hans Wallach,et al.  On Sound Localization , 1938 .

[14]  P. Young,et al.  The r?le of head movements in auditory localization. , 1931 .

[15]  Simon R. Oldfield,et al.  Acuity of Sound Localisation: A Topography of Auditory Space. I. Normal Hearing Conditions , 1984, Perception.

[16]  F L Wightman,et al.  Localization using nonindividualized head-related transfer functions. , 1993, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[17]  William M. Hartmann,et al.  Localization of sound in rooms. , 1982, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[18]  S. Perrett,et al.  The effect of head rotations on vertical plane sound localization. , 1997, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[19]  F. Wightman,et al.  A model of head-related transfer functions based on principal components analysis and minimum-phase reconstruction. , 1992, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[20]  Nathaniel I. Durlach,et al.  On the Externalization of Auditory Images , 1992, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[21]  F L Wightman,et al.  Headphone simulation of free-field listening. II: Psychophysical validation. , 1989, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.