Individual Behavior and Group Membership

People who are members of a group and identify with it behave differently from people who perceive themselves as isolated individuals. This paper shows that group membership affects preferences over outcomes, and saliency of the group affects the perception of the environment. We manipulate the saliency of group membership by letting a player's own group watch as a passive audience as decisions are made, and/or by making part of the payoff common for members of the group. In contrast to the minimal-group paradigm, minimal groups alone do not affect behavior in our strategic environments. However, salient group membership significantly increases the aggressive stance of the hosts (people who have their group members in the audience), and tends to reduce that of the guests. (JEL D71, Z13)

[1]  Frederick Winslow Taylor,et al.  科学管理原理=The principles of scientific management , 2014 .

[2]  M. Elton.  The social problems of an industrial civilization , 1957 .

[3]  Elton Mayo,et al.  The Social Problems of an Industrial Civilization. , 1946 .

[4]  D. Blackwell.  Comparison of Experiments , 1951 .

[5]  A. Rapoport,et al.  Prisoner's Dilemma , 1965 .

[6]  Robert B. Zajonc,et al.  Social enhancement and impairment of performance in the cockroach. , 1969 .

[7]  H. Tajfel,et al.  Social categorization and intergroup behaviour , 1971 .

[8]  H. Tajfel,et al.  Social categorization and similarity in intergroup behaviour , 1973 .

[9]  M. Brewer.  In-group bias in the minimal intergroup situation: A cognitive-motivational analysis. , 1979 .

[10]  H. Tajfel,et al.  An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. , 1979 .

[11]  S. Worchel,et al.  The Social psychology of intergroup relations , 1979 .

[12]  Rupert Brown,et al.  Group Identification: The Same Thing to All People? , 1984 .

[13]  M. Brewer,et al.  Effects of group identity on resource use in a simulated commons dilemma. , 1984, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[14]  Roderick M. Kramer,et al.  Choice behavior in social dilemmas: Effects of social identity, group size, and decision framing. , 1986 .

[15]  Robert Forsythe,et al.  Selection Criteria in Coordination Games: Some Experimental Results , 1987 .

[16]  John Orbell,et al.  Not me or thee but we: the importance of group identity in eliciting cooperation in dilemma situatio , 1988 .

[17]  M. Hogg,et al.  Book Review: Social identifications: A social psychology of intergroup relations and group processes , 1991 .

[18]  M. Hogg,et al.  Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory. , 1989 .

[19]  John Orbell,et al.  Selfishness examined: Cooperation in the absence of egoistic incentives. , 1989 .

[20]  T. W. Ross,et al.  Communication in Coordination Games , 1992 .

[21]  Robert Forsythe,et al.  COMMUNICATION IN THE BATTLE OF THE SEXES GAME , 1989 .

[22]  John Orbell,et al.  Cooperation for the benefit of us—Not me, or my conscience. , 1990 .

[23]  Brian Mullen,et al.  Ingroup bias as a function of salience, relevance, and status: An integration , 1992 .

[24]  Robert Forsythe,et al.  Forward Induction in the Battle-of-the-Sexes Games , 1993 .

[25]  Elizabeth Newton,et al.  The Social Context of Negotiation , 1993 .

[26]  W. Bodmer.  Principles of Scientific Management , 1993, FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology.

[27]  Caroline Kelly,et al.  Group Identification, Intergroup Perceptions and Collective Action , 1993 .

[28]  G. Tabellini,et al.  Is Inequality Harmful for Growth , 1994 .

[29]  John Kelly,et al.  Who Gets Involved in Collective Action?: Social Psychological Determinants of Individual Participation in Trade Unions , 1994 .

[30]  Paul G. Straub.  Risk dominance and coordination failures in static games , 1995 .

[31]  Caroline Kelly,et al.  Identity and injustice: Exploring women's participation in collective action , 1995 .

[32]  Carole L. Crumley.  Historical ecology : cultural knowledge and changing landscapes , 1996 .

[33]  Aldo Rustichini,et al.  Social conflict and growth , 1996 .

[34]  M. Brewer,et al.  Who is this "We"? Levels of collective identity and self representations. , 1996 .

[35]  W. Easterly,et al.  Africa's Growth Tragedy: Policies and Ethnic Divisions , 1997 .

[36]  D. Cremer,et al.  Social identification effects in social dilemmas : a transformation of motives , 1999 .

[37]  S. Alexander Haslam,et al.  Psychology in Organizations: The Social-Identity Approach , 2000 .

[38]  George A. Akerlof,et al.  Economics and Identity , 2000 .

[39]  Catherine C. Eckel,et al.  Managing Diversity by Creating Team Identity , 2005 .

[40]  J. Diamond.  Collapse: How Societies Choose to Fail or Succeed , 2005 .

[41]  A. McMichael,et al.  Collapse. How Societies Choose to Fail or Succeed. Jared Diamond. New York: Viking, 2004. , 2006 .

[42]  Esteban F. Klor,et al.  Social Identity and Preferences Over Redistribution , 2007 .

[43]  G. Charness,et al.  Informal Risk Sharing in an Infinite-Horizon Experiment , 2006 .

[44]  Matthias Sutter,et al.  Individual Behavior and Group Membership: Comment , 2008 .

[45]  Aldo Rustichini,et al.  Dominance and Competition , 2008 .

[46]  Nina Mazar,et al.  Large stakes and big mistakes , 2009 .

[47]  S. Heap,et al.  The Value of Groups , 2006 .

[48]  John Smith.  Reputation, Social Identity and Social Conflict , 2009 .

[49]  Yan Chen,et al.  Group Identity and Social Preferences , 2009 .