Rethinking teaching and teachers: Bringing content back into conversation

The question of content – that is, knowledge in the curriculum – has all but disappeared from global policy and academic discourses concerning teaching and teachers. Invoking the work of Michael Young and his colleagues concerning 'bringing knowledge back in', Bildung -centred Didaktik , and Joseph J. Schwab's curriculum thinking, this article attempts to bring content back into the conversation on teaching and teachers. The discussion yields an educational, curricular understanding of teaching and teachers by making three arguments. First, teaching (content) is an 'intergenerational' task vital for social reproduction and innovation. Second, teaching, by way of a meaningful encounter between content and students, contributes to their self-formation and the development of human powers and dispositions. Third, teaching is a practical, interpretive act that calls for curriculum thinking that is centred on the 'what' (content) and 'why' (purpose) of teaching.

[1]  Simone Weil.  Spiritual Autobiography , 2019, Waiting for God.

[2]  Zongyi Deng.  Pedagogical content knowledge reconceived: Bringing curriculum thinking into the conversation on teachers' content knowledge , 2017 .

[3]  Zongyi Deng.  Bringing knowledge back in: perspectives from liberal education , 2017 .

[4]  G. Whitty,et al.  Knowledge traditions in the study of education , 2017 .

[5]  Rose M. Ylimaki,et al.  Non-affirmative Theory of Education as a Foundation for Curriculum Studies, Didaktik and Educational Leadership , 2017 .

[6]  Joseph J. Schwab.  EROS AND EDUCATION: A DISCUSSION OF ONE ASPECT OF DISCUSSION , 2016 .

[7]  Zongyi Deng.  Content, Joseph Schwab and German Didaktik , 2015 .

[8]  Johan Muller,et al.  Curriculum and the Specialization of Knowledge: Studies in the sociology of education , 2015 .

[9]  M. Young,et al.  Knowledge and the Future School: Curriculum and social justice , 2014 .

[10]  M. Young,et al.  On the powers of powerful knowledge , 2013 .

[11]  R. Künzli.  Memorizing a memory: Schwab’s the Practical in a German context , 2013 .

[12]  Michael Young.  Overcoming the crisis in curriculum theory: a knowledge-based approach , 2013 .

[13]  G. Biesta.  Giving Teaching Back to Education: Responding to the Disappearance of the Teacher , 2013 .

[14]  Ian Westbury,et al.  Didaktik as a Theory of Education: Erich Weniger , 2012 .

[15]  Lyn Yates,et al.  The Absence of Knowledge in Australian Curriculum Reforms , 2010 .

[16]  Gert Biesta,et al.  Good Education in an Age of Measurement: Ethics, Politics, Democracy , 2010 .

[17]  Zongyi Deng.  The formation of a school subject and the nature of curriculum content: an analysis of liberal studies in Hong Kong , 2009 .

[18]  M. Young.  Education, globalisation and the ‘voice of knowledge’ , 2009 .

[19]  A. Dworkin,et al.  International handbook of research on teachers and teaching , 2009 .

[20]  S. Hopmann.  No child, no school, no state left behind: schooling in the age of accountability 1 , 2008 .

[21]  G. Yonge,et al.  The significance of the concepts ‘elemental’ and ‘fundamental’ in didactic theory and practice , 2008 .

[22]  M. Young.  What are schools for , 2007 .

[23]  Michael Young,et al.  EXTENDED REVIEW , 2007 .

[24]  Stefan Hopmann,et al.  Restrained Teaching: The Common Core of Didaktik , 2007 .

[25]  Amnon Karmon.  “Institutional Organization of Knowledge”: The Missing Link in Educational Discourse , 2007, Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education.

[26]  Wolfgang Klafki.  Didaktik analysis as the core of the preparation of instruction , 2006 .

[27]  D. Levine.  Powers of the Mind: The Reinvention of Liberal Learning in America , 2006 .

[28]  Gert Biesta,et al.  Against learning. Reclaiming a language for education in an age of learning , 2004 .

[29]  David Hamilton,et al.  The pedagogic paradox (or why no didactics in England , 1999 .

[30]  Christoph Luth.  On Wilhelm von Humboldt's Theory of Bildung , 1998 .

[31]  Thomas L. Good,et al.  International handbook of teachers and teaching , 1997 .

[32]  W. Reid.  Democracy, Perfectability, and the Battle of the Books: Thoughts on the Conception of Liberal Education in the Writings of Schwab , 1980 .

[33]  Gary D. Fenstermacher.  The Nature of Science and Its Uses for Education: Remarks on the Philosophical Import of Schwab's Work , 1980 .

[34]  Joseph J. Schwab.  The Practical 3: Translation into Curriculum , 1973, The School Review.

[35]  Joseph J. Schwab.  The Practical: A Language for Curriculum , 1969, The School Review.

[36]  Joseph J. Schwab.  College Curriculum and Student Protest , 1969 .