Structure of the Antimicrobial, Cationic Hexapeptide Cyclo(RRWWRF) and Its Analogues in Solution and Bound to Detergent Micelles

Antimicrobial, cationic peptides are abundant throughout nature as part of many organisms' defence against microorganisms. They exhibit a large variety of sequences and structural motifs and are thought to act by rupturing the bacterial membrane. Several models based on biophysical experiments have been proposed for their mechanism of action. Here we present the NMR‐determined structure of the cyclic, cationic antimicrobial peptide cyclo(RRWWRF) both free in aqueous solution and bound to detergent micelles. The peptide has a rather flexible but ordered structure in water. A distinct structure is formed when the peptide is bound to a detergent micelle. The structures in neutral and negatively charged micelles are nearly identical but differ from that in aqueous solution. The orientation of the amino acid side chains creates an amphipathic molecule with the peptide backbone forming the hydrophilic part. The orientation of the peptide in the micelle was determined by using NOEs and paramagnetic agents. The peptide is oriented mainly parallel to the micelle surface in both detergents. Substitution of the arginine and tryptophan residues is known to influence the antimicrobial activity. Therefore the structure of the micelle‐bound analogues cyclo(RRYYRF), cyclo(KKWWKF) and cyclo(RRNalNalRF) were also determined. They exhibit remarkable similarities in backbone conformation and side‐chain orientation. The structure of these peptides allows the side‐chain properties to be correlated to biological activity.

[1]  S H White,et al.  The nature of the hydrophobic binding of small peptides at the bilayer interface: implications for the insertion of transbilayer helices. , 1989, Biochemistry.

[2]  Ad Bax,et al.  Quantitative J correlation: a new approach for measuring homonuclear three-bond J(HNH.alpha.) coupling constants in 15N-enriched proteins , 1993 .

[3]  J. Killian,et al.  How proteins adapt to a membrane-water interface. , 2000, Trends in biochemical sciences.

[4]  E Maier,et al.  Mechanism of interaction of different classes of cationic antimicrobial peptides with planar bilayers and with the cytoplasmic membrane of Escherichia coli. , 1999, Biochemistry.

[5]  V. Saudek,et al.  Gradient-tailored excitation for single-quantum NMR spectroscopy of aqueous solutions , 1992, Journal of biomolecular NMR.

[6]  R I Lehrer,et al.  Crystallization of antimicrobial pores in membranes: magainin and protegrin. , 2000, Biophysical journal.

[7]  Structure determination of a tetrasaccharide: transient nuclear Overhauser effects in the rotating frame , 1984 .

[8]  T. Unger,et al.  The effect of cyclization of magainin 2 and melittin analogues on structure, function, and model membrane interactions: implication to their mode of action. , 2001, Biochemistry.

[9]  R. Houghten,et al.  The antimicrobial activity of hexapeptides derived from synthetic combinatorial libraries. , 1995, The Journal of applied bacteriology.

[10]  K. Wüthrich.  NMR of proteins and nucleic acids , 1988 .

[11]  H. Vogel,et al.  The structure of the antimicrobial active center of lactoferricin B bound to sodium dodecyl sulfate micelles , 1999, FEBS letters.

[12]  H. Vogel,et al.  The structure of the antimicrobial peptide Ac-RRWWRF-NH2 bound to micelles and its interactions with phospholipid bilayers. , 2003, The journal of peptide research : official journal of the American Peptide Society.

[13]  W. Webb,et al.  Two classes of alamethicin transmembrane channels: molecular models from single-channel properties. , 1995, Biophysical journal.

[14]  H. Vogel,et al.  Three-dimensional solution structure of lactoferricin B, an antimicrobial peptide derived from bovine lactoferrin. , 1998, Biochemistry.

[15]  Y. Shai,et al.  Mechanism of the binding, insertion and destabilization of phospholipid bilayer membranes by alpha-helical antimicrobial and cell non-selective membrane-lytic peptides. , 1999, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[16]  K. Matsuzaki.  Why and how are peptide-lipid interactions utilized for self-defense? Magainins and tachyplesins as archetypes. , 1999, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[17]  Richard R. Ernst,et al.  Investigation of exchange processes by two‐dimensional NMR spectroscopy , 1979 .

[18]  C. Nathan.  Antibiotics at the crossroads , 2004, Nature.

[19]  R. Hancock,et al.  Structure of the bovine antimicrobial peptide indolicidin bound to dodecylphosphocholine and sodium dodecyl sulfate micelles. , 2000, Biochemistry.

[20]  H. Vogel,et al.  Conformation of a Bactericidal Domain of Puroindoline a: Structure and Mechanism of Action of a 13-Residue Antimicrobial Peptide , 2003, Journal of bacteriology.

[21]  L. Mueller,et al.  NMR identification of protein surfaces using paramagnetic probes. , 1990, Biochemistry.

[22]  Richard R. Ernst,et al.  Coherence transfer by isotropic mixing: Application to proton correlation spectroscopy , 1983 .

[23]  J. Svendsen,et al.  Antimicrobial activity of short arginine‐ and tryptophan‐rich peptides , 2002, Journal of peptide science : an official publication of the European Peptide Society.

[24]  Richard R. Ernst,et al.  Multiple quantum filters for elucidating NMR coupling networks , 1982 .

[25]  C. B. Park,et al.  Mechanism of action of the antimicrobial peptide buforin II: buforin II kills microorganisms by penetrating the cell membrane and inhibiting cellular functions. , 1998, Biochemical and biophysical research communications.

[26]  W. Shafer,et al.  Bactericidal activity of a synthetic peptide (CG 117-136) of human lysosomal cathepsin G is dependent on arginine content , 1996, Infection and immunity.

[27]  H. Vogel,et al.  Structure of the antimicrobial peptide tritrpticin bound to micelles: a distinct membrane-bound peptide fold. , 1999, Biochemistry.

[28]  G. Otting,et al.  Identification of protein surfaces by NMR measurements with a pramagnetic Gd(III) chelate. , 2002, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[29]  M. Dathe,et al.  Cyclization increases the antimicrobial activity and selectivity of arginine- and tryptophan-containing hexapeptides. , 2004, Biochemistry.

[30]  R. Hancock,et al.  Cationic peptides: effectors in innate immunity and novel antimicrobials. , 2001, The Lancet. Infectious diseases.

[31]  G. Wagner.  NMR INVESTIGATIONS OF PROTEIN STRUCTURE , 1990 .

[32]  M. Zasloff.  Antimicrobial peptides of multicellular organisms , 2002, Nature.

[33]  M. Billeter,et al.  MOLMOL: a program for display and analysis of macromolecular structures. , 1996, Journal of molecular graphics.

[34]  D. Case,et al.  Adding Harmonic Motion to the Karplus Relation for Spin-Spin Coupling , 1994 .

[35]  R. Hancock,et al.  Structure-based design of an indolicidin peptide analogue with increased protease stability. , 2003, Biochemistry.

[36]  H. Vogel,et al.  Diversity of antimicrobial peptides and their mechanisms of action. , 1999, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[37]  M. Dathe,et al.  Antimicrobial activity of arginine- and tryptophan-rich hexapeptides: the effects of aromatic clusters, D-amino acid substitution and cyclization. , 2004, The journal of peptide research : official journal of the American Peptide Society.

[38]  H. G. Boman,et al.  Mechanisms of action on Escherichia coli of cecropin P1 and PR-39, two antibacterial peptides from pig intestine , 1993, Infection and immunity.