Histogram analysis versus region of interest analysis of dynamic susceptibility contrast perfusion MR imaging data in the grading of cerebral gliomas.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Histogram analysis can be applied to dynamic susceptibility contrast (DSC) perfusion MR imaging datasets and can be as effective as traditional region-of-interest (ROI) measurements of relative cerebral blood volume (rCBV), an operator-dependent method. We compare the routine ROI method with histogram analysis in the grading of glial neoplasms. MATERIALS AND METHODS Ninety-two patients underwent conventional and DSC MR imaging. Routine rCBV (rCBVmax) measurements were obtained from ROIs of the maximal abnormality within the glioma. Histogram analysis rCBVT was performed with an ROI drawn around the maximal tumor diameter. Spearman rank correlations measured associations among glioma grade, rCBVmax, and histogram measures. Mann-Whitney tests compared grade with respect to rCBV and histogram measures. Logistic regression and McNemar test compared the utility of rCBVmax and histogram measures for detecting high grade gliomas. RESULTS Routine rCBVmax analysis showed significant correlation with grade (r = 0.734, P < .001). Histogram rCBVT metrics showed significant correlation with grade (P < .008); the 3 highest were rCBVT SD, SD50, and mean25 (r = 0.718, 0.684, and 0.683, respectively). Grade could be predicted by rCBVmax (P < .001) as well as rCBV(T) (P < .008). Three rCBVT histogram measures (SD, SD25, and SD50) detected high-grade glioma with significantly higher specificity than rCBVmax when the diagnostic tests were constrained to have at least 95% sensitivity. CONCLUSION rCBVT histogram analysis is as effective as rCBVmax analysis in the correlation with glioma grade. Inexperienced operators may obtain perfusion metrics using histogram analyses that are comparable with those obtained by experienced operators using ROI analysis.

[1]  M. Rovaris,et al.  A new method for analyzing histograms of brain magnetization transfer ratios: comparison with existing techniques. , 2004, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[2]  Glyn Johnson,et al.  Low-grade gliomas: dynamic susceptibility-weighted contrast-enhanced perfusion MR imaging--prediction of patient clinical response. , 2006, Radiology.

[3]  J. Petrella,et al.  Perfusion MR imaging of brain neoplasms. , 2000, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[4]  Jayaram K. Udupa,et al.  Magnetization Transfer Ratio Histogram Analysis of Normal-Appearing Gray Matter and Normal-Appearing White Matter in Multiple Sclerosis , 2002, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[5]  M Takahashi,et al.  Value of dynamic susceptibility contrast magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation of intracranial tumors. , 1999, Topics in magnetic resonance imaging : TMRI.

[6]  Susan M. Chang,et al.  Dynamic susceptibility-weighted perfusion imaging of high-grade gliomas: characterization of spatial heterogeneity. , 2005, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[7]  B R Rosen,et al.  Clinical applications of intracranial perfusion MR imaging. , 1999, Neuroimaging clinics of North America.

[8]  G Johnson,et al.  Glial neoplasms: dynamic contrast-enhanced T2*-weighted MR imaging. , 1999, Radiology.

[9]  K. Hess,et al.  Correlation between dynamic MRI and outcome in patients with malignant gliomas , 1998, Neurology.

[10]  J K Udupa,et al.  Magnetization transfer ratio histogram analysis of gray matter in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. , 2001, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[11]  Glyn Johnson,et al.  Glioma grading: sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values of perfusion MR imaging and proton MR spectroscopic imaging compared with conventional MR imaging. , 2003, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[12]  E F Halpern,et al.  Cerebral blood volume maps of gliomas: comparison with tumor grade and histologic findings. , 1994, Radiology.

[13]  Glyn Johnson,et al.  Intracranial mass lesions: dynamic contrast-enhanced susceptibility-weighted echo-planar perfusion MR imaging. , 2002, Radiology.

[14]  B R Rosen,et al.  Echo-planar MR determination of relative cerebral blood volume in human brain tumors: T1 versus T2 weighting. , 1996, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[15]  Jin-Suh Kim,et al.  Using relative cerebral blood flow and volume to evaluate the histopathologic grade of cerebral gliomas: preliminary results. , 2002, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[16]  B. Rosen,et al.  Perfusion imaging with NMR contrast agents , 1990, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[17]  Glyn Johnson,et al.  Relative cerebral blood volume measurements in intracranial mass lesions: interobserver and intraobserver reproducibility study. , 2002, Radiology.

[18]  M Takahashi,et al.  Correlation of MR imaging-determined cerebral blood volume maps with histologic and angiographic determination of vascularity of gliomas. , 1998, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[19]  J. Babb,et al.  Dirty-appearing white matter in multiple sclerosis: volumetric MR imaging and magnetization transfer ratio histogram analysis. , 2003, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[20]  J. Petrella,et al.  MR perfusion imaging of the brain: techniques and applications. , 2000, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.