The Epidemiology of Fragrance Allergy: Questions and Needs
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] P. Frosch,et al. A multicenter study ofsynchronous left- versus right-sided patch tests by the German Contact Dermatitis Research Group , 1994 .
[2] J. Ring,et al. Reproducibility of patch tests. , 1989, Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology.
[3] I Kimber,et al. Thresholds in contact sensitization: theoretical and practical considerations. , 1999, Food and chemical toxicology : an international journal published for the British Industrial Biological Research Association.
[4] O. Gefeller,et al. Reproducibility of patch tests , 2004, Contact dermatitis.
[5] Spontaneous reporting: how many cases are required to trigger a warning? , 1991, British journal of clinical pharmacology.
[6] A. Schnuch. PAFS: population–adjusted frequency of sensitization , 1996, Contact dermatitis.
[7] B. Meding. Epidemiology of hand eczema in an industrial city. , 1990, Acta dermato-venereologica. Supplementum.
[8] T. Menné,et al. [Contact sensitivity to cosmetics in an unselected Danish population. The Glostrup Allergy Study, Denmark]. , 1993, Annales de dermatologie et de venereologie.
[9] J A Hanley,et al. If nothing goes wrong, is everything all right? Interpreting zero numerators. , 1983, JAMA.
[10] Skov,et al. Allergens in combination have a synergistic effect on the elicitation response: a study of fragrance‐sensitized individuals , 1998, The British journal of dermatology.
[11] W. Lehmacher,et al. National rates and regional differences in sensitization to allergens of the standard series , 1997, Contact dermatitis.
[12] D. Holness,et al. Validity of patch test screening trays in the evaluation of patients with allergic contact dermatitis. , 1989, Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology.
[13] S. Feldman,et al. Significance-prevalence index number: a reinterpretation and enhancement of data from the North American contact dermatitis group. , 1999, Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology.
[14] B. Lindelöf. A left versus right side comparative study of Finn Chamber™ patch tests in 220 consecutive patients , 1990, Contact dermatitis.
[15] A. Lavrijsen,et al. Evaluation of a self‐administered questionnaire on hand dermatitis , 1992, Contact dermatitis.
[16] J. S. Taylor,et al. North American Contact Dermatitis Group patch test results for the detection of delayed-type hypersensitivity to topical allergens. , 1998, Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology.
[17] R. Vermeulen,et al. Ascertainment of hand dermatitis using a symptom‐based questionnaire; applicability in an industrial population , 2000, Contact dermatitis.
[18] G A Colditz,et al. Postmarketing surveillance and adverse drug reactions: current perspectives and future needs. , 1999, JAMA.
[19] W. Aberer,et al. Multicentre studies and conflicting prevalence data , 1992, Contact dermatitis.
[20] W Uter,et al. Epidemiology of contact dermatitis. The information network of departments of dermatology (IVDK) in Germany. , 1998, European journal of dermatology : EJD.
[21] Moride Yola,et al. Evidence of the depletion of susceptibles effect in non-experimental pharmacoepidemiologic research. , 1994 .
[22] J. Lachapelle. A left versus right side comparative study of Epiquick™ patch test results in 100 consecutive patients , 1989, Contact dermatitis.
[23] H. Jick,et al. Principles of epidemiological research on adverse and beneficial drug effects , 1998, The Lancet.
[24] M J Sold,et al. If nothing goes wrong—is everything alright? , 1987, Anaesthesia.