Comparison of Contact Mechanics between a Total Hip Replacement and a Hip Resurfacing with a Metal-On-Metal Articulation

Abstract The finite element method was employed in this study to compare the contact mechanics at the bearing surfaces between a metal-on-metal hip resurfacing prosthesis and a total hip replacement with a similar bearing combination. The hip resurfacing prosthesis was implanted and modelled in a full three-dimensional pelvic and femoral bone. A significant reduction in the predicted contact pressure by over 53 per cent as well as a corresponding increase in the contact area by approximately 220 per cent was found in the hip resurfacing prosthesis, in comparison to the total hip replacement. The reduced contact pressure and increased contact area in the hip resurfacing system were due to the combination of the larger bearing size and increased elasticity from the metallic cup and the underlying bone support. The hip resurfacing prosthesis may therefore offer a significant improvement in the tribology at the metallic bearing surfaces, thus offering a potential advantage in terms of long-term clinical success over current total hip replacements with reported survivorships over 20 years.

[1]  Z. Jin,et al.  Contact mechanics of a novel metal-on-metal total hip replacement , 2001, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of engineering in medicine.

[2]  F. Dorey,et al.  Evolution and future of surface replacement of the hip , 1998, Journal of orthopaedic science : official journal of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association.

[3]  Z. Jin,et al.  Elastohydrodynamic lubrication analysis of metal-on-metal hip prostheses under steady state entraining motion , 2001, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of engineering in medicine.

[4]  R Huiskes,et al.  Post-loosening mechanical behavior of femoral resurfacing prostheses. , 1990, Clinical materials.

[5]  D. Dowson,et al.  Prediction of lubricating film thickness in UHMWPE hip joint replacements. , 2001, Journal of biomechanics.

[6]  G. Bergmann,et al.  Hip contact forces and gait patterns from routine activities. , 2001, Journal of biomechanics.

[7]  Z. Jin,et al.  Contact mechanics analysis of metal-on-metal hip resurfacing prostheses , 2004, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of engineering in medicine.

[8]  M. Brazzelli,et al.  A systematic review of the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of metal-on-metal hip resurfacing arthroplasty for treatment of hip disease. , 2002, Health technology assessment.

[9]  R. Huiskes,et al.  Effects of Metal-Inlay Thickness in Polyethylene Cups With Metal-on-Metal Bearings , 2002, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[10]  E. Ebramzadeh,et al.  Lessons learned from loosening of the McKee-Farrar metal-on-metal total hip replacement. , 1999, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[11]  M. S. Thompson.  The design of a novel hip resurfacing prosthesis , 2001 .

[12]  P S Walker,et al.  The tribology (friction, lubrication and wear) of all-metal artificial hip joints. 1971. , 1971, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[13]  R. Huiskes,et al.  A clinical, radiological and biomechanical study of the TARA hip prosthesis , 2004, Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery.

[14]  M. Wagner,et al.  Preliminary Results of Uncemented Metal on Metal Stemmed and Resurfacing Hip Replacement Arthroplasty , 1996, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[15]  Michael Tanzer,et al.  The Otto Aufranc Award. Wear and lubrication of metal-on-metal hip implants. , 1999, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[16]  P. Pynsent,et al.  Metal on Metal Surface Replacement of the Hip: Experience of the McMinn Prosthesis , 1996, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[17]  D. Dowson,et al.  The effect of femoral head diameter upon lubrication and wear of metal-on-metal total hip replacements , 2001, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of engineering in medicine.

[18]  M. Silva,et al.  The biomechanical results of total hip resurfacing arthroplasty. , 2004, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[19]  E. Munting,et al.  Fixation and effect on bone strain pattern of a stemless hip prosthesis. , 1995, Journal of biomechanics.

[20]  F. Higuchi,et al.  Metal-on-metal CoCrMo McKee-Farrar total hip arthroplasty: characteristics from a long-term follow-up study , 1997, Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery.

[21]  P. Campbell,et al.  Metal-on-metal hybrid surface arthroplasty: two to six-year follow-up study. , 2004, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[22]  R. Chiesa,et al.  In vivo wear of three types of metal on metal hip prostheses during two decades of use. , 1996, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[23]  Z. Jin,et al.  Contact mechanics of metal-on-metal hip implants employing a metallic cup with a UHMWPE backing , 2003, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of engineering in medicine.

[24]  P B Pynsent,et al.  Metal-on-metal resurfacing of the hip in patients under the age of 55 years with osteoarthritis. , 2004, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[25]  K. Smet,et al.  Early results of primary Birmingham hip resurfacing using a hybrid metal-on-metal couple. , 2002, Hip international : the journal of clinical and experimental research on hip pathology and therapy.

[26]  K. Tanner,et al.  Effects of acetabular resurfacing component material and fixation on the strain distribution in the pelvis , 2002, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of engineering in medicine.

[27]  A Yew,et al.  Analysis of contact mechanics in McKee-Farrar metal-on-metal hip implants , 2003, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of engineering in medicine.

[28]  A. Yettram,et al.  Stress and strain distribution within the intact femur: compression or bending? , 1996, Medical engineering & physics.

[29]  D Dowson,et al.  A full numerical analysis of hydrodynamic lubrication in artificial hip joint replacements constructed from hard materials , 1999 .

[30]  O. Wahlström,et al.  20-Year Results of McKee-Farrar Versus Charnley Prosthesis , 1996 .

[31]  H. Wagner,et al.  Surface replacement arthroplasty of the hip. , 1978, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[32]  E. Schneider,et al.  The influence of friction and interference on the seating of a hemispherical press-fit cup: a finite element investigation. , 1999, Journal of biomechanics.

[33]  Z. Jin,et al.  Analysis of elastohydrodynamic lubrication in McKee—Farrar metal-on-metal hip joint replacement , 2004, Proceedings of the Institution of mechanical engineers. Part H, journal of engineering in medicine.

[34]  Z. Jin,et al.  Elastohydrodynamic lubrication analysis of metal-on-metal hip-resurfacing prostheses. , 2003, Journal of biomechanics.

[35]  Harlan C. Amstutz,et al.  Metal on Metal Surface Replacement of the Hip: Technique, Fixation, and Early Results , 1996, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[36]  N Shiba,et al.  Biomechanical study of the resurfacing hip arthroplasty: finite element analysis of the femoral component. , 2000, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[37]  M. Lavigne,et al.  Chromium and cobalt ion release following the Durom high carbon content, forged metal-on-metal surface replacement of the hip. , 2007, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.